- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
9 K2 u1 v. @0 L: D7 n z( U- A6 S; R( P) `
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
8 m$ Z) u; I9 r, P& ~' L3 S9 [& o6 r5 |8 l
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
$ ^# s1 O$ c8 Q! A C$ O+ zand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.' q1 p/ c7 x ]# Q% i
9 n+ d2 _$ ]( y% I& n- e, H2 \6 pso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
! c1 y# a; e8 | b1 B$ c. m! O9 b* x: r( }1 g) x" N- \. W9 \- o! @5 D6 N
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
4 B: X( ]: a3 n4 W* \at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|