 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.* V2 G4 g" C$ y0 u, m
% \7 t% R+ N7 p u, K( ^9 k' l, t
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
& u; i) A0 C5 ^
3 H3 r4 O) F+ [( I& d7 VIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
" q7 H- f' e+ s# q6 b0 q2 k" zand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.5 `! I+ v+ [" x
; m# \# d; `2 a0 ~so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險8 m" E4 l+ h& e
$ c3 h) M: _- z: J+ @7 n
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 6 j A; t8 ~" Y/ K z- C
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|