Rika

由最好排到最壞! [) Z7 {# T  H. \( ^/ f$ Q/ f
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
4 D' \0 J9 Q$ ^9 |  J, v: h$ f$ Z5 mB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount* U# p5 E, c* F1 q$ [5 Q
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
5 h" }. {  V% `+ E  e$ s) v- uM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure/ R2 r) q0 u) Z9 E  G
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
1 A% k8 H4 c' Q$ k. A7 `2 q% o
7 o6 \+ d4 f# b5 DM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人! s9 g7 ^/ k6 ~

# g- a; [! B7 t1 RS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)8 ~- Q% y/ j! c! K- y' v" {: R
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
8 _6 P) i. D! a6 b1 s  U  Y
% H, }$ x' V' E$ p0 W" M5 Q+ [B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做- S' I0 R! i. Q, s5 A% q7 P
* G' R, U# q/ Z) C3 n7 i
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
8 x9 Z) E# n6 @) @) ?
% i, Z8 b4 p3 i8 s/ p5 [F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,/ ^/ @- w+ c2 t- {" `7 L+ x  O
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好4 @! T; x7 B) ^" M( p2 m

- c! [; P6 s* `( E. \[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案) k6 |- |/ ]+ c
而家答多次) l% Z2 R7 W- N$ \. L/ j
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽- F& \  M; I7 t) T
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架9 }- S! ]8 N. c+ B/ u# ?
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢" X) q* X  V: ]( b! [
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.7 _" q0 H" r9 i+ [; W! L
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* M  R. i$ J2 w* G8 e

+ i+ b) j6 w4 @# u$ Q9 O. QL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
4 @5 |2 c, \: d$ |! dF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度* \" z: U5 m( u8 u
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒3 }. s' }: \# b& o8 z8 J" P8 S7 \
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
6 [3 I4 P" E0 P& hB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
2 {1 ]+ E7 |1 M/ p& x( TF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. }, g, x' }+ |& \+ }S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
: u: }& y7 e7 a5 h( O) mM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
6 K# {! i" ?0 R$ OL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果3 i, z% v8 ~; L" {
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情. o3 c: G& j  x/ C

$ j& v- d1 E0 T! T0 F6 q* d世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
& L& D7 {) P7 s% ~. RL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 G( Y' t6 G# q, k5 E: aB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
% R, ?& N$ v7 u( n5 k5 }S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件! y6 G- q) S+ e6 L  A8 r
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方  b; h; R9 [. e6 K  f9 j3 @, [+ K
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 V5 e# Y- j8 c; z; ~
2 @4 P7 b" w/ l% G- | same choices with u , but want to add some comments
& v/ E3 l7 d" E  R6 R
8 Y& y" }3 t9 m+ Z' i; ?# f2 TB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ! T; J$ W1 d; {+ V! j; j
: {4 t0 W, x: z; w1 z* U
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )" x- t$ n& b. ^9 w( e: o
) m% i8 H+ B5 ^* ?1 _& e
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome # P# ^2 E4 |% d- J& W
1 e; n* o% ?7 m+ ]: u5 D
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......6 a8 j- U. g% F3 D3 h" w

  f) F4 J6 S' P/ `[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
% T: N3 N2 S/ T. [/ g4 nM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
" C/ |% n5 T5 l" {. EL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點8 W# |0 s% g6 y% r8 z
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
% V7 N" @1 K4 |1 m) s% \; n  H  B# I" t9 H* X
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....# U* o7 U5 S% u6 k; I0 t5 E
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，$ W2 a- E0 I' K2 t( X
由最好開始排起既話，
( N' G2 o- }: R0 A8 JL B M F S 啦，" \7 c4 F) g6 p5 _3 f  P2 y# f

% t% L2 G7 L0 H其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
, L% l" J1 L, Z3 \" X! F6 p5 y但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
% p) D! F, u! v如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？! r, B! A% L4 j( C
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
4 e' M- q' A$ {* k5 z; R$ p4 @; G2 L8 P
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，1 f- ?' u+ ]8 }) z
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，3 N4 c0 T- a, X' B0 R9 X
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。6 G$ a( Z9 v2 @: D3 k
) r& Z3 Y# O% u7 N4 O- l' l0 Y
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，6 O8 B- d4 n/ l
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
5 Y; H# G" [# m/ l! ?亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，/ W: m' K! R2 a6 ^- ], S6 g, v5 i
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，% l1 {0 ?1 \8 Z/ h# q* Q5 ~
M 都可算壞了。; E* A! }0 s. T
6 k. c, G* p9 o+ B* e" w
F 呢個人仲掂，+ |/ W5 h$ f' z9 E- m( k
知道既唔等於要講，$ k+ p; ~' C- |3 t2 a% P
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，3 i) Y$ a: m) U) C! v
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。! u5 F7 b5 i) l# q5 T2 I! l
( a( t$ Q2 C( P' o) x2 @
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，3 `# U' \# l* ~# C
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
6 z# ^8 U+ U( Z
& {8 u. N' x4 [: Y& P
6 ~$ U6 p% y; U  k  g% r/ v
# @0 ]- r0 B% B1 B4 W題外話：
5 ^" ~$ _# R) M; x# H* N3 s: z唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
: ]/ x, U; ?' h6 O7 ^% q+ d7 Z' i睇到 S 呢條友，+ B- _4 v. u8 l5 E+ f, d% Y
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
% N9 C4 d0 [# |$ j* @* {1 m, l
( A& ^. @+ I* Y, D. O! c3 bS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!& x8 R% K6 S! E+ c1 {9 g( C4 G
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
; x/ q# q3 h/ zM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
3 j4 ~1 R! z2 V8 Z. Y1 e2 PB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害+ E6 l/ r; N+ F5 y8 u$ P0 |1 o
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...