Rika

由最好排到最壞- V' b% W. k5 x. @7 Y+ X2 r& _
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong3 _! O; i% s0 N$ J3 z" L9 X
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
" y9 `9 z+ k+ R  D! J+ U& XS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
7 U3 u6 P6 B1 z* EM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
* V( y) p& Z; S9 T5 l% uL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:) A  P6 d, y! }7 x6 b& y
* g0 |3 g. z% S2 x6 I& Y1 [
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人% Z8 y7 t$ `7 w( X$ d
5 r9 e. E/ e* Z$ R2 s1 C/ N
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
3 D% y0 S& _% u2 [, G0 O     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
3 m& P2 v% q) ~+ X5 N& O$ q5 \
" l* z: y) f$ y. O. iB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做* t! C, d3 I' L6 t

" x$ H5 B4 \' ^0 ^9 Q' @4 zL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志' B; _6 J7 ^6 R( W

+ r6 p; ^4 r& S; @8 gF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,. L. S' k5 N! Z! g  \' |# p& I
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
7 L$ P5 V; y/ K+ `8 k3 k) d. r$ i; S2 ?2 i7 j" S
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
2 @' `0 k0 P& R1 E5 I( Q% t而家答多次, x$ M" r9 G$ F7 H) X
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽4 _& k7 H5 x& a: z& U
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
, _# Q! x( h( y, _  S. lb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢3 H, T. b! D$ j* ]1 R
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.- j- Z8 m  w$ ^5 A# i. u; W
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
# G/ D& x; b# F7 J, C( U' m% G( v
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大! a8 |1 A8 [7 J
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
1 E+ r) O* J' N6 q- C9 w( ]8 CM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
, ^* L& r' `* wS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
  y. P, o; F( x, MB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
3 m" x+ ]3 v6 G' p/ d' g  `F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. b: [7 @( T% K9 S( Z3 j' qS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
, r  g6 o; |8 Y6 n4 X$ oM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
" _/ D  L+ R* U5 ^; Z! @L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
' n% D$ o' n5 b4 |B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
/ t" z, b: c5 y7 ~) S$ W: Q7 ~9 u  p! l& \( v3 B! d
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:6 i. C& X0 J, S1 {$ L
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己/ V- h6 O$ ~: d% a& f
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘2 r0 O. _. }# z; J6 a
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
' p2 ~+ e. h7 a( A4 @F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
7 r1 K9 C- E- Z0 r1 H9 o- h: F* iM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, C) u* i( ]; h" a- h9 e- g5 T5 M! j9 u
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
: T4 c3 K' r7 |
, M9 W8 s/ h8 ?B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
$ m6 G- q. w3 L' _
" v0 q+ B! z1 D$ \S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ), |, p' O! A& H& Z. f4 i9 t
1 I# Z% `0 y/ ~# m, Q' N5 v) m! D
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
# R/ f0 H9 W8 B# _5 X& u2 M1 ~# V
; \! ^: Y0 Y& d* m  `1 T9 lM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......' w) Y% _7 V5 Y5 T

) l/ p8 \7 q) u8 V[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
! s& C/ s+ h2 A2 SM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢% }  f5 n. S9 a  W; v
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點) o! u; s+ x6 F; g$ ]* Y
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma1 Y' T# d3 Z( e& p: _/ |2 Q3 F
. z, A6 ^0 A4 R: d
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
, U+ V+ I; c! @0 e; p8 P  ^1 N5 n有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
4 P0 m1 Z7 p1 r由最好開始排起既話，, w. c, A" e! S: d/ S8 e
L B M F S 啦，
0 C3 Y& z. n$ P' s  K, J; x' l) k) x1 v; N
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，, H. l5 _: j4 G6 W
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？# L( P5 M! V/ d5 _! F1 V
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
! q- p. w, p% D8 j- p4 V又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
3 q5 }1 J/ Q' i4 ~+ M8 T+ v/ \& M" D% W! E: I, V% B7 m
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，$ {( F8 z& S& U* a9 g' `
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
) D' J& Z$ d/ L* X* J明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
. }! ~2 A% `8 e. `6 S3 H% u7 M' [4 W5 A6 F; [
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，0 a& }0 z5 A, H3 [0 T4 q  ~3 @
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
4 K  Z4 G, i6 r2 N亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
! G& \; i" c" j知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，8 e6 Z4 Z( T0 X$ j& g
M 都可算壞了。
$ E* V8 ]9 c  S- I% b; W, b0 ^/ U! H. z2 ^' k
F 呢個人仲掂，
9 i, I) l! n  c- P3 [' L. C知道既唔等於要講，) ?+ ~. H, F. A: Q
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，( E% E6 E$ t1 T% t, Y4 I/ r  e
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。' m  c% ?6 k7 D, L$ Q# B" M

9 n0 h. G: j: W$ V# x最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
' C1 T  m( x% H始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
* x  }4 h& a! a3 S6 t  j) S( X; N8 u% [

9 p2 ]0 ^! P7 }' P% }' t" f  E$ e" @# }; Q9 ~
題外話：
1 t; A6 d! Q( M# t2 V: M唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，/ J3 V* h, w, p4 B6 D* l+ D
睇到 S 呢條友，( q" a( D: u" ~* K- i- J. f
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
4 n8 Z" z6 Q8 V4 n+ _- g) }
# p$ S$ `! r  x/ G7 W0 B8 P& JS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!% C2 D- h( k( _8 l1 o* F$ u( O
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
$ [) E  }. L  H) m4 b4 ]M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
5 Y! k' ^( D% \3 xB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
/ y0 h% ^3 `/ g0 Z" J9 tL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...