Rika

由最好排到最壞/ @3 R# Y! E) ?& e; P. {# s" n5 C
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong+ }$ w; F% w5 Z
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount' h& u7 w/ R$ a& z
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
4 ~) B6 t1 h' i1 B7 pM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
* o8 w5 f3 I2 h6 [. m' n' `L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
$ @$ F6 r5 o8 o( V; w& ^. ?6 J+ z$ |& R  F' P0 K
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人6 S: T' j: ?  |
: N$ ], m7 v" X  u" x9 i: g& @
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% J0 J; N. L2 Q# H" @     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!) ]: J; ]& O" \; y
% i2 [- |( p8 L2 ?! R
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做3 r- ~+ d2 E3 G, \; k7 ^" w! |, y7 t
  b) i# F0 Q! {2 ?4 @7 c# y
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志* \+ Q- a$ L; d8 C( i5 B% r

; l1 Y* l1 `0 _: ]/ T, K5 K' xF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; d2 m3 g, m* n/ l" I3 t1 _2 v: q     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
' C) V9 ?2 Y7 |: I0 M' X% d+ s& B6 X' \
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案* l0 M: C0 |0 ~) Y( g  j
而家答多次' E" {" B9 r3 e. Z! x" U% v7 X
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
9 Q: g6 }# u* h; B- m& rl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架: V# s) Q1 Z% T) J
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢6 [) O4 i6 p: v! Y; i' q. @2 u  b
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
5 Y, A1 X1 q1 H/ F* Pm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S) c" \; Y; B# w/ D" U! |- O* n
, q3 X0 c, X0 Y( N  n
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大, _' j. v2 d' _5 h' z
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度2 z0 c0 S: w/ Z4 t! C
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒8 @  f7 H* i/ ?% p  ~$ {# z
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
! U9 W1 r" W9 m! T7 P. OB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞6 P$ |1 H7 c7 \3 H! s4 a- \1 y. I
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
3 P8 h% k& C7 \0 IS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
9 _2 E  E* I2 X9 e( c& PM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法  y/ J& O; D4 ?8 L! C
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
0 ]% n0 b7 m: w: VB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情% b$ o4 Y8 T( C  v2 a9 r
$ ^; L) J( O% a! y
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:4 Y, k, s1 v: o* m" d, _! p
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
  D% ^% D7 ^6 j) k+ x! S# E) s& qB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
7 G' Q3 z+ j8 D! X  t" O5 jS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: D( }" [% h; W: ^! ^+ dF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
% S/ q2 h; }" J7 MM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

5 d5 k) H8 v, d% a! w7 p* D) t6 v  e- e+ \5 o& ?1 J6 J
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
5 |7 ], ~4 F1 {3 Q9 C$ V1 r
0 B) t* x1 j' o( ?- d7 iB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
% B8 Z; v* r1 I; l
1 G- `' w) F+ G3 ^( }S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
. m) f/ S1 \. p
; K: y( P! R! P2 h% Z) ]% A* |F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome & i1 `  `  i  C- v3 `

, g7 A5 G2 J4 CM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
. O3 s" H. U7 \0 ]$ G1 x# s' H# ~& A' @2 Z4 x& J+ u4 r
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge, ^, u1 K" t' I' w, j
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 a6 B8 T7 _: [L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
; x8 ^% Z1 e9 `& gF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
# ]) b9 ]  [. ~# C3 d6 q. G7 m7 ?8 F) ?" a5 p+ `  @' c
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- G- ^( L# C- t5 y" U9 ]' s
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，0 z( }. i8 C1 t
由最好開始排起既話，
4 X1 y/ j; O$ D& ]8 U6 Z( ^1 gL B M F S 啦，
' |: D; O" s) {6 [$ T/ U" E5 {* [9 S
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，# J- l& o& w: l% p7 b; l' C8 V4 A
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？7 [$ |& @" @5 T( b3 M) V6 z
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？/ M1 k2 _) m0 L/ I" z- Z/ @
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
; ?& w5 R5 O4 \0 _1 G( M2 K2 M) D
; }4 T: n! z1 I! z. s* p而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，* p3 v& L9 @" }* d5 f! O3 y( I. R
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
% x2 {: j4 j  x9 y明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。4 E6 h5 g/ l- r* _
- h3 M/ ~6 e+ a& s2 J; z) n
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，# e; v4 v* g+ b) x5 O
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
/ P' ?& v9 j3 a1 g2 z6 c# B# J: k亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，: m8 }* V, l# B
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，/ [7 p' N8 _  ?' J. Q
M 都可算壞了。( F8 t/ v/ b; X8 i1 [
# ^" z& ^% h2 U# O4 c3 j" b
F 呢個人仲掂，
& Q8 @- ]1 c+ e知道既唔等於要講，
9 D/ T7 s* j" W. x" ^: k如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
$ O. G8 f4 G: z0 X$ C我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。! L) u7 v+ F& r" U1 y2 o- ~% e

0 f# H) z1 ~  ^4 D1 [" U最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
. L" r8 O- r; W1 m0 P始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。* J2 Z$ n( `+ M2 D4 ^, ?- w1 O" f
* _2 A2 r3 L" G: Y6 ?

( T% s. w; z* e( ~3 {: |' [7 S
題外話：
0 f) T" g& {+ ]3 o( @唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
! O) H  \9 u: e睇到 S 呢條友，4 u9 E, Z) {5 U' H9 _& Q7 B
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L1 z7 Y( e7 V/ J: R0 M1 P6 F* I0 Z

2 Y6 a1 [' {% d+ C- W* T- dS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!: W" g* N2 _( ^$ s8 B3 ?) w
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
" W% ]0 l+ J$ I% q& dM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
, t/ d! k+ D" h- PB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
; M& B3 N; B1 T9 I' t# p6 s; t1 HL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...