Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
- D" y1 x6 T; r2 N& J" c9 S2 U3 a) z
, o2 M1 v5 v1 [0 K% a
  |" o! L) b7 y; o# }我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

& O# H& J7 r+ u+ F. N) H
: m2 k6 k) V# \8 VIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
# \, {: K& l9 M" _% @
; A1 N5 L( F$ l/ U7 S
% ]' ~1 I! J; T, ]4 ~0 g  c8 y2 [In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  G1 k) V& e9 z4 _3 V

3 d, \9 I; U1 N/ b" voh really...  m8 x, j9 `, ]* }8 e) R
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"8 ]! k2 Z& |( Q1 S: M1 d2 T" c
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題7 D& f- k* {1 `
' ~, n- X9 F- i# ^* O; C9 H. [
當然這是個假設性問題6 ]: n1 \- k, c  k% D- g
但將人數倍大
2 z7 ]0 P6 u$ x+ Z/ u+ C; k例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個6 ~4 m9 e' w/ H- V
(情況可以換作其他)1 D8 ^7 Z; i6 N
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.... P) f! ?1 g( ?! H4 X
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
9 M# G" C% E) t; w1 @- I  G* u如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:; ]2 j5 f4 E  N# N/ G8 D  |
絕情谷既問題...5 K4 C/ s4 z7 F, J; }
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...5 m0 `; B' V' g: L& _& G$ D
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

8 x; ]7 K3 ]( W* R; b' G
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好) Y. x: b& v+ X& y2 F3 D  Q
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
% f/ ^2 Q! x8 _. l但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩8 P* ?4 O, s8 |) b. _" ~- Y
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
; b% {+ P1 m1 j. r5 `' Y, u其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢$ L$ N" c' V% }2 j, b3 Q

: U& F, ?( C: N" h3 r我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
  O% i8 T/ y, Y  s" E& f0 v不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
! U9 s, p2 \* g7 S7 M5 z其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

; j* y1 D- _* O. N+ P, Q, |: |+ K" p3 \) ?, |. v, T
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣8 t2 |$ O, o, w' s+ Y
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
/ O. f3 o' M* B& g# V
# C) M+ ^2 b! [p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 M- u, `% j+ \- q: f/ [& \yes, my reason is helping more
) P: `1 h' T$ @# j5 B3 ^  Jfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!; q. n( {7 |( E* l
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
3 z. b/ `/ I/ R; |3 hbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?/ i; P. b  d# e# T' E; S4 v
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!+ Y* G6 B5 f" s6 d1 A
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
0 z! V+ I9 y3 f. runder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~$ y/ A! H0 t8 N& Z/ e6 q3 x1 k- p3 l
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~4 m5 K# M$ R3 I9 @" L* Q1 k/ }
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~4 N8 n% g4 ?# o3 G4 S& \
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~0 Q5 R  Z& e) N0 x$ w6 B
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
8 C; \1 J2 C3 j; _我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
; Z3 ]! z* U* O* Y但如果o係當時o既情況中~~8 k4 g: m7 P) \8 M: e3 X9 O
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）