Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:8 H5 @; F4 h. y8 N
  o  h7 {7 ~; ~; T* Y1 D+ K

6 \' Y; Y# ~, Y( m1 G) D0 A: ?我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

$ P, v$ V( x: ?1 C( q* J* t6 N; V

" L% l: y3 b4 P! r/ Z1 w/ CIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
4 U  W0 g3 Y8 n( Q* `; A- q# r1 T0 q, |) j% `* r
0 J! y. M# U, F; J
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 V( R- P( l, O2 J6 t! Y
! b5 z! O6 u: X
oh really...
+ |# c! c+ Q6 G9 h: s( [/ Ihahhaa, thx a lot^^"
+ h; r* b' u: C- f8 B, k( ]' ki didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題6 h& C/ M3 G8 O) ?
1 E5 a0 q" ^  m, {" q8 K( M
當然這是個假設性問題
; U& L8 F2 Z% i/ @但將人數倍大/ I- l7 o& Z6 M& x# k9 }) A1 B
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個9 u- D$ n9 J0 j! }
(情況可以換作其他)
$ @/ q, l5 ]  W' {6 l. V始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
% t3 t* U8 X8 x- M- |: j如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
# l1 E. p0 R6 C如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:# ~* s, J* J3 Z, H+ D, [6 |
絕情谷既問題...6 [4 r# G9 `/ ?2 w
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ K$ j& e/ z& ^1 ~如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

) w- z( |, W# w$ Y: g8 |
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好- L( n2 h5 ^' i7 m
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生# S  e5 _& F8 ?. \
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
, X, n% j& @4 L: T( N' D4 z好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
+ ], R! E& W  g其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢* n1 _6 T0 U0 q

& v. }, Z/ @( ]4 @6 v) R我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
7 ^$ l+ I$ G7 V9 J4 W* I  F1 R不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:  K) f9 l4 e. n9 l; z: G
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

! W" \5 b; U! U# h8 M" s0 h
" v, v+ q  f6 T! |8 k+ N& P- hhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
" _" F" J8 _' y# o- R. Q  ~你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
6 u# n6 \" {+ _  A7 |. Y5 u/ F% x# E% T9 J
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
9 Y/ g- q7 I9 j1 }  p2 n# ]4 ayes, my reason is helping more7 S; A! h7 V! I% ?9 v" [: u% A
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!/ f( I& q* Q- E; i3 `
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child$ [, `* B9 i4 u+ ]
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
6 ^# v2 I# ^) L$ h9 n7 E& Q5 halso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
9 n* U% ~6 N: ?0 n2 E$ o! c1 }+ w& fmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!! z4 a! |- O3 D2 ^! N
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
4 u% W- f0 E. K當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
" B" S$ b) r: Q+ y我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
0 r* a8 o6 I5 C, T0 Y+ X) F# M正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~+ \* O9 ^" U* k
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
! g& R, Y0 S( p4 P0 X5 `我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~3 |- K& M+ c) X4 d! d. [1 X
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~! {1 ~' a  P) M, K
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）