Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:6 W4 E/ T) D- A$ d5 {+ a; S& n6 S
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:4 t8 u" k; k+ B1 X: w! @
各位brother
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:; ]" w2 L" g: Y2 j2 m" N R
8 ]$ U! ~8 Q' k: j* Y
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:
好認同 !!!
good point !
出得術既都有限料啦
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:. B3 V, U" W- O4 Y
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:. R T% Z% u2 y. F5 J) F
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?8 f1 m7 s, Q" @, O; v- j
* A, e. P ~8 p7 W' E- M9 Q
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事 A# ?" J( q. O5 n
! n) W9 ]! A" ~) w
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?
1 [4 v7 Y" {& n" u. }. i3 `
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:
出猫并唔係刑事的
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:" p0 a& s4 c* o% F' Z4 T( }
講真
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦1 n0 r1 n& d0 n4 M2 y* }
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格
有機會佢d答案錯既
你有可能會唔合格tim, D- w7 s5 [/ o: @1 R( [3 K: }
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢
咁都會有個網有d會考資料
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:
5 a2 F6 S- S) \0 y% c/ D4 J
考題係抄個網的
考評局懶Q到照出1 b, Q" k3 R1 i* t0 m9 z' x1 {
班考生先咁興
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
8 W6 K1 j/ s5 p) Y3 h# J
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限: i8 N7 y1 c3 ~6 t7 s9 z
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:1 [, p) {- |/ p w( Q6 J
) e9 ^7 g" {0 M: ?0 G
刑事係要舉證的
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:1 \7 _% H* h0 m
- q( `& M7 A: n/ k) x
* d* Z; x8 V L9 a! B. W& l
你當香港冇王管咩, l# i7 H6 h/ F6 p& U
唔係刑事
你點申請法庭手令呀
責任係考評局度
要查IP呢D野5 r7 l# s: ^, Y2 x; o
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:4 \ G" O. ]' B3 ~0 p3 J1 w- m$ I
# K" P& B- D4 N
+ C6 F# M" x0 M* Z
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve,
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平/ [. q1 x. A, o. j, L
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:
j7 m. r1 `3 z
- P/ D: S. ]7 {
% k" R6 Z1 n0 v/ v5 ~0 W& C2 ~
取消得一係就+曬
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:
. d8 c3 S0 A6 [1 v- F+ i6 b
- c! O4 I' ~% b n! i. p
4 I# |6 D- H# N+ [& Z4 O+ P, G4 {. `/ U% c
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪4 c0 ]% b3 H K$ [
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪; i# P9 ~. ~0 x. F
8 y+ e/ a% q# q% i
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管
$ v7 @4 u- ]& W0 [, _6 G5 E
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:
7 r2 C! y8 Z, I& j. c& u5 o% i; I2 S
% z- ^ V/ {5 h8 n% T. c
, M& _$ e" g2 e C$ o4 E
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
6 J3 s0 S9 @& x( q& M
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法
就係冇相關的! C; w1 _) w- i- M& W
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:
5 M1 y& z- M7 k
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例8 \ i, F4 _ m
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法3 {9 K% Y3 X U9 U% G* p1 i/ q
8 i0 a4 L5 L+ [# g6 f8 ^% K) z- n/ B
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:- D. h, J c N- |( M* }0 [: v- E# Z
, ?+ b+ B8 ?; J, X* Z) j
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:
. A) y0 g0 H- N# e7 M; i$ ?
我反反問3 T' U$ k4 Y$ ]/ V
我(上)面唔係講左咩
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:& o2 ?4 \" V' d7 z+ m8 n
重唔重考唔重要
最緊要收到成績單之後
唔好又走出黎話
唔公平要重考
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:* g0 R* K1 v0 t( r' g, g" [
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇+ |3 {1 o, }& R! U) Q- {& s
有左對策+ i* G/ \4 |$ H! f
各位brother睇睇$ d- f; S" V7 a l/ z0 u! ~* y
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策
各位brother睇睇9 n/ w' D% K' r n* ^
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:; Z9 O: \1 n) z1 U# t5 a S
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:
8 b" g9 F H1 [, R& y6 I
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:# i$ {. w* {$ g
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:( T v" J ]: d
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:
i retake this year . G' \- [. ?1 ^: l; m4 T
: T. m( K+ s( d: i. ~3 D I& T
i really dun...
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |