娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: is man united goal valid in FA cup final [打印本頁]

作者: loglog 時間: 2007-5-20 01:08 AM 標題: is man united goal valid in FA cup final

Is the goal of man united by giggs be valid or not? the ball has passed the white line but it seems the ball and the goalie were pushed together.

作者: hizaku 時間: 2007-5-20 01:08 AM

that's a foul, no doubt at all
only brainless die-hard fans will consider that as a legit goal

作者: van nistelrooy 時間: 2007-5-20 01:08 AM

probably not.....

作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2007-5-20 01:11 AM

吹左先入都計咁越位後入波果Ｄ點計？

杜奧巴今季越位後入波唔只一球..............

作者: HediSlimane 時間: 2007-5-20 01:35 AM

No that is not a goal nor a foul i think
first its giggs who pushed cech into the goal after he caught the ball
second giggs could not stop himself from sliding towards cech so it is not intentional.

good judgement by the referee

作者: Shaqleung 時間: 2007-5-20 01:51 AM

其實慢鏡顯示個波係入左界......理論上係入波....但係giggs又真係有侵龍....因為cech係hold住左個波.....但係佢又唔係得登wor.......係呢個情況應該係保護龍門....我諗球證都無判錯~~

作者: cfccfcc 時間: 2007-5-20 11:30 AM

外電報導
話0個球，球証無罰，亦無當過左白界，真係謎~~~
不過講真，點都唔會count入架喇，大佬，你推果龍門入去都計?霸道左少少wor
响禁區店1店龍門都要吹啦，更何況成個人撞埋去

作者: hideaki 時間: 2007-5-20 11:33 AM

应该不算

因为门将以把球守在手中
只不过GIGGS的冲劲太大橦了一下
才把球橦进白线里

进球算都是犯规在先

作者: chicken 時間: 2007-5-20 11:38 AM

Giggs's foul first, invalid.

作者: looklook007 時間: 2007-5-20 11:59 AM

See See http://soccer.rubbishman.net/clip.php?action=play&cid=1092

Giggs係收唔到先撞過去，甘摌去話停就停咩...
但是，點都好，甘計入就算拎到都唔光彩啦...

作者: liverster 時間: 2007-5-20 12:00 PM

Rugby都有機會當入,Soccer就....................

作者: cfccfcc 時間: 2007-5-20 12:53 PM

Originally posted by looklook007 at 2007-5-20 11:59 AM:
See See [url]http://soccer.rubbishm...

無人話佢係有心
但係犯規唔關有無心事
撞到就係撞到

作者: bigfish 時間: 2007-5-20 12:55 PM

球波未完全過晒白界, 不過傑斯就冇犯規, 因為佢只係收唔切先撞埋去, 何況傑斯o既去勢本身就向龍門入面衝, 但守門員就反而橫身向傑斯要去o既方向度撲, 因此要罰都係罰施治

作者: hizaku 時間: 2007-5-20 01:10 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-20 12:55 PM:
球波未完全過晒白界, 不過傑斯就冇犯...

LAWLZ

作者: iknow 時間: 2007-5-20 01:30 PM

岩岩睇左highlight...我覺得冇咩問題...
傑斯個勢唔係好兇...
個波入左lo...我睇到...

作者: liverster 時間: 2007-5-20 01:31 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-20 12:55 PM:
球波未完全過晒白界, 不過傑斯就冇犯...

不如叫施治行開,等傑斯連人蔕波撞入空龍好唔好?

作者: HediSlimane 時間: 2007-5-20 03:13 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-20 02:55 PM:
球波未完全過晒白界, 不過傑斯就冇犯...

I adore your soccer knowledge.

作者: 自由神 時間: 2007-5-20 03:19 PM

Originally posted by iknow at 2007-5-20 01:30 PM:
岩岩睇左highlight...我覺得冇咩問題...
傑斯個勢唔係好兇...
個波入左lo...我睇到...

我笑住口咁推個籠門入去！計唔計先？

作者: 自由神 時間: 2007-5-20 03:20 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-20 12:55 PM:
球波未完全過晒白界, 不過傑斯就冇犯...

你無事呀！
你睇下慢鏡呀！GIGGS用過隻手拍個波嫁！
係咪要俾既紅牌佢，再算果個係入球呀？

作者: cfccfcc 時間: 2007-5-20 03:55 PM

Originally posted by iknow at 2007-5-20 01:30 PM:
岩岩睇左highlight...我覺得冇咩問題...
傑斯個勢唔係好兇...
個波入左lo...我睇到...

咁都無問題?
衝撞龍門wor?

作者: iknow 時間: 2007-5-20 03:59 PM

Originally posted by 自由神 at 2007-5-20 03:19 PM:

我笑住口咁推個籠門入去！計唔計先？

我唔係話佢個樣...
而係埋去個勢lo唔該

作者: ronja 時間: 2007-5-20 08:03 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-20 12:55:
球波未完全過晒白界, 不過傑斯就冇犯...

你去做球証都應該幾有前途......

作者: MaxFigo 時間: 2007-5-20 08:14 PM

Originally posted by iknow at 2007-5-20 03:59 PM:

我唔係話佢個樣...
而係埋去個勢lo唔該

有冇犯規唔係睇你個勢
係睇你有冇掂到
你勾跌左人，理得你個勢強定弱，你係有勾過就犯規，無情講
更何況，樓上都有人講過，禁區內keeper世界，你掂一掂佢都唔得
何況傑斯係如你所講，「溫柔地」推施治入龍門？？

所以呢球波個重點唔係個波過左白界未
而係傑斯早係入波前已經侵犯龍門，犯左規

作者: mj1234456 時間: 2007-5-20 11:45 PM

I dun think so..

作者: 自由神 時間: 2007-5-20 11:53 PM

Originally posted by iknow at 2007-5-20 03:59 PM:

我唔係話佢個樣...
而係埋去個勢lo唔該

個勢唔係惡，不過有傷害性都係犯規！
我唔係想同你鬧交，只係果球波真係無可能算入。

我明白愛隊落敗係好唔開心，不過都唔可以夾硬黎嫁！

作者: 自由神 時間: 2007-5-20 11:53 PM

Originally posted by MaxFigo at 2007-5-20 08:14 PM:

有冇犯規唔係睇你個勢
係睇你...

Long Time no see

thz for you support

作者: lywv5 時間: 2007-5-21 01:11 AM

49000
-69000
199000

作者: MingLai 時間: 2007-5-23 12:09 AM

Originally posted by 自由神 at 2007-5-20 03:20 PM:

你無事呀！
你睇下慢鏡呀！GIGGS用過隻手拍個波嫁！
係咪要俾既紅牌佢，再算果個係入球呀？

佢不嬲都有事!

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)