娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Henry SUCKS!!!!!!!! [打印本頁]

作者: crap 時間: 2004-12-13 09:23 PM 標題: Henry SUCKS!!!!!!!!

he really is a dog!
an asshole!
that stupid referee shouldnt let him shoot the freekick like that lor
Arsenal go to hell!

作者: Anonymous 時間: 2004-12-13 10:08 PM

雖然我唔係Arsenal 迷
亦都唔鍾意佢地( 鍾意車仔多過佢地好多 tim)
不過我唔覺得 henry 有問題
問題在於球證既身體動作
球例上亦都冇講話唔可以咁做
作為一個職業球員個職責係幫球會贏波
體育精神唔係必要
Henry 亦都唔係第 1 次咁做
不過最後~
問題係在於球證~ 唔係在於 Henry 囉

作者: 科 時間: 2004-12-14 12:45 AM

頭先睇新聞,話:<當時享利問球證開得未,球證話開得,咁就入左

作者: crap 時間: 2004-12-14 04:12 AM

quote from 訪客: "體育精神唔係必要"

i totally agree with that
and for that reason Mr Henry should never get voted for 'Best players of the world/ Europe' sthg like that
he doesn't deserve it

Ronaldinho is much kinder and Shevchenko is so gentle
Henry sucks!

i agree that the ref got responsibility
but the point is Henry's the one who had intention to do this shit kind of thing
well...may be he didnt do wrong as a soccer player
but he didnt do anything human should do...
sport players should strive to win, but win without humiliating their sports

作者: 事但 時間: 2004-12-14 03:24 PM

我想先要搞清楚,
球例並沒有寫明必須要有球証雞聱才可以開出罰球.
既然係咁,其實無論係亨利或者係個球証都冇錯.

問題只係當時球証o既動作或者說話會唔會比車仔球員有錯誤訊息.

作者: Anonymous 時間: 2004-12-14 03:47 PM

你地咁剷ｈｅｒｎｙ，都係因為你地ｌｉｋｅ車仔ｊａｒ
咪扮正義啦

作者: Anonymous 時間: 2004-12-14 04:32 PM

你個傻佬幾時見到有係剷 Henry?
我剷球證
事但兄又係剷球證
科兄直頭冇
CRAP 兄都只係話 Henry 冇乜體育精神

作者: ahfUNG_908 時間: 2004-12-14 05:45 PM

亨利冇錯唔好屈佢~車仔d人自己慢唔可以話人~
車仔和波就話人狗我覺得你仲狗~

作者: fung0109 時間: 2004-12-14 07:32 PM

我覺得球例超狗....可以咁!?
不過亨利都醒...識問過球證先...
唔洗自己衰...~~

作者: crap 時間: 2004-12-15 06:37 AM

[quotefrom="ahfUNG_908"]亨利冇錯唔好屈佢~車仔d人自己慢唔可以話人~
車仔和波就話人狗我覺得你仲狗~

even if chelsea won i'd say Henry's a dog
coz thats the truth

i wanna make it crystal clear that i think Henry has done sthg vr dog
not he did sthg illigal...

u know, if u make a joke on ur classmate, u didn't do sthg illigal, but u r vr dog, there will be no cops coming to arrest u, its only the matter of ur personality and reputation

by the way, pls be polite to others, if u think i attacked Henry and he's unhappy with that, u can give me his phone no. and we'll settle it down
theres no reason of u saying "我覺得你仲狗" publicly
pls respect others
thx a lot

作者: 事但 時間: 2004-12-15 03:09 PM

點解快開罰球就係好"狗"?

係其他比賽,經常都可以見到一擺定個波就快開,
只不過唔知點解,
快開罰球製造攻勢入波冇人會鬧,
但快開罰球直射入網就係好狗?

作者: crap 時間: 2004-12-15 04:25 PM

any kind of 快開罰球 is some sort of 乘人之危
no matter how intelligent that is
乘人之危 at least means some level of 'dog' lor

Imagine there's a girl
she's not ready for making love yet
but her boyfriend 乘人之危 (maybe the girl's drunk.. whatever)
and put 'sthg' into her virgina.....
is that dog?

in Arsenal v Chelsea case
the girl = Chelsea
not ready for ml yet = the wall n keeper weren't ready yet
her bf = Henry
乘人之危 = 快開罰球
sthg = the ball
virgina = Chelsea's goal

well... the girl knows she would have sex with her bf, she is happy for that, she welcome him to do so, the point is she isn't ready yet, so her bf's a dog by doing that

Cech and the team know henry would take the free kick, they are happy for that, they welcome him to do so, the point is they are not ready yet, therefore Henry's dog

does it make any sense to u?
well.....
just forget about my bulls-hit if u dun like it

cheers

作者: 事但 時間: 2004-12-15 04:49 PM

你可以講快開罰球係乘機,
但你似乎忘記了,
得到罰球的一方是因為攻方有球員受到侵犯所致,
他們的攻勢受到不合法的阻止,
亦因此在罰球中,攻方是理應得到比守方多優勢的.

開罰球者可以選擇要對方離球10碼(但要等雞聲,不能快開);
或者選擇快開,但就不能要求對方離球10碼.

在這角度下,我看不到亨利有可受批評之處.

(大家發表意見,冇話鐘唔鐘意喎.
就事件有唔同意見作討論o者)

作者: kantang4910 時間: 2004-12-16 04:28 PM

[quotefrom="事但"]你可以講快開罰球係乘機,
但你似乎忘記了,
得到罰球的一方是因為攻方有球員受到侵犯所致,
他們的攻勢受到不合法的阻止,
亦因此在罰球中,攻方是理應得到比守方多優勢的.

開罰球者可以選擇要對方離球10碼(但要等雞聲,不能快開);
或者選擇快開,但就不能要求對方離球10碼.

在這角度下,我看不到亨利有可受批評之處.

(大家發表意見,冇話鐘唔鐘意喎.
就事件有唔同意見作討論o者)

作者: 事但 時間: 2004-12-17 07:20 PM

[quotefrom="kantang4910"][quote][quotefrom="事但"]你可以講快開罰球係乘機,
但你似乎忘記了,
得到罰球的一方是因為攻方有球員受到侵犯所致,
他們的攻勢受到不合法的阻止,
亦因此在罰球中,攻方是理應得到比守方多優勢的.

開罰球者可以選擇要對方離球10碼(但要等雞聲,不能快開);
或者選擇快開,但就不能要求對方離球10碼.

在這角度下,我看不到亨利有可受批評之處.

(大家發表意見,冇話鐘唔鐘意喎.
就事件有唔同意見作討論o者)

That you say is only said by the 球證 in that match ( Arsenal vs 車仔 ), I never listen it before ( Player can choose 對方離球10碼 or 快開 ) . Don't he say what and then think what is , find out the rule by FIFA and UEFA lar . :?:[/quote]
咁你搵比我睇,
球例邊一條係寫明罰球一定要有雞聲至可以開?
如果球例真係有咁寫明,
係我錯囉.

作者: 侵略者 時間: 2004-12-18 01:28 AM

總括黎講亨利就冇錯~~~
我支持亨利~~~

作者: kicas 時間: 2004-12-29 10:19 PM

其實...呢個先例一開
呢d波都會繼續有
咁有冇須要改一改球例呢講真

作者: kakueeken 時間: 2004-12-29 10:35 PM

[quotefrom="kicas"]其實...呢個先例一開
呢d波都會繼續有
咁有冇須要改一改球例呢講真

henry 只是用了球例的灰色地帶, 我自己覺得問題唔大,起碼光明過搏12碼。況且henry 又唔係第一個人射呢d 波, 我都唔明點解呢件事引起外界咁大0既反應。

不過不少教練, 包括arsenal 教練雲格, 都認為有修例的需要, 以澄清有關球例。

作者: ipkigi 時間: 2004-12-31 02:18 AM

冇乜所謂la我覺得,睇你覺得運動應該under "sportmanship" ar,定係"win at all cost" kei jer

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)