Board logo

標題: 熱火上訴獲悉﹐下次和膺隊碰頭將重賽51.9秒 [打印本頁]

作者: Xtravagant    時間: 2008-1-12 08:01 AM     標題: 熱火上訴獲悉﹐下次和膺隊碰頭將重賽51.9秒

NBA 史無前例地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HAWKS既賽事進行重賽。
但吾係打晒成場﹐只係最後果51.9妙。呢個重賽將於下次和HAWKS碰頭時比賽之前舉行。

[我覺得NBA呢個決定有D兒戲]

[ Last edited by Xtravagant on 2008-1-12 at 08:04 AM ]
作者: brightlee    時間: 2008-1-12 08:02 AM

Oh~~~ how come?
is that something wrong in that match?
作者: Xtravagant    時間: 2008-1-12 08:15 AM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2008-1-12 08:02 AM:
Oh~~~ how come?
is that something wrong in that match?
Shaq was charged with a wrong foul and got fouled out in the last game when the score was very close / tie. The foul was acutally charged against another player (forgot who hewas).
作者: chicken    時間: 2008-1-12 09:06 AM

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2008-1-12 08:15:


Shaq was charged with a wrong foul and got fouled out in the last game when the score was very close / tie. The foul was acutally charged against another player (forgot who hewas).
That's unbelievable error so rematching later period is a good decision I think.
作者: nac971    時間: 2008-1-12 09:45 AM

熱火下次對鷹隊係8/3(香港時間9/3)
作者: chong2002    時間: 2008-1-12 09:50 AM

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2008-1-12 08:01 AM:
NBA 史無前例地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HA...
嘩...我以前我以前玩3on3 先有依d..
估唔到nba 都有
作者: Overpowering    時間: 2008-1-12 02:17 PM

so funny....
作者: brightlee    時間: 2008-1-12 02:23 PM

Additional information:

The protest is the first granted by the NBA since December 1982, when then-NBA commissioner Larry O'Brien upheld a request for a replay by the San Antonio Spurs after their 137-132 double-overtime loss to the Los Angeles Lakers the previous month.

The Spurs and Lakers finally finished the game in April 1983, with San Antonio winning 117-114.
作者: kgkgkg212121    時間: 2008-1-12 02:48 PM

51.9秒... 熱晒身準備晒就係為左果51.9秒~~
114-111
有1個幾月時間俾佢地諗下點追果3分~~
作者: Mun    時間: 2008-1-12 03:58 PM

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2008-1-12 08:01 AM:
NBA 史無前例地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HA...
It's not......
作者: 123456yyyYYY    時間: 2008-1-12 04:55 PM

咁都得@@
查實點解要 "重賽"呢 51.9秒呢?
作者: kgkgkg212121    時間: 2008-1-12 06:20 PM

Originally posted by Mun at 2008-1-12 03:58 PM:

It's not......
只係25年黎第1次
作者: 阿感    時間: 2008-1-12 07:45 PM

熱火打成咁,都入唔荒入到playoff啦,呢場就咁輸埋佢,博選秀佢好過啦

[ Last edited by 阿感 on 2008-1-12 at 10:17 PM ]
作者: brightlee    時間: 2008-1-12 10:06 PM

Originally posted by 阿感 at 2008-1-12 21:45:
熱火打成咁,都入唔荒入到playoff啦,呢場就咁輸埋佢,博過選秀佢好過啦
the problem is: when they got the trading for Ricky Davis this year, they sent 1st round pick to T'wolves...
so they won't get 1st round pick at the end of this season

作者: Xtravagant    時間: 2008-1-12 10:11 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2008-1-12 10:06 PM:

the problem is: when they got the trading for Ricky Davis this year, they sent 1st round pick to T'wolves...
so they won't get 1st round pick at the end of this season
Really ??? so if they get 1st round, it will be sent to t'wolves?
作者: asurada001    時間: 2008-1-12 10:16 PM

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2008-1-12 09:11 AM:


Really ??? so if they get 1st round, it will be sent to t'wolves?
the draft pick is lottery protected in 2008, top 10 in 2009, top 6 in 2010, beyond: unprotected.....

therefore miami will keep this pick this year as long as they don't make the playoffs..

http://www.nbadraft.net/draftnotes.asp#min102407

[ Last edited by asurada001 on 2008-1-12 at 09:17 AM ]
作者: brightlee    時間: 2008-1-12 10:29 PM

Originally posted by asurada001 at 2008-1-13 00:16:


the draft pick is lottery prote...
Thanks for your information~~~!!
Cos when I read that trading first time.. I couldn't see that selection criteria
作者: asurada001    時間: 2008-1-12 11:42 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2008-1-12 09:29 AM:

Thanks for your information~~~!!
Cos when I read that trading first time.. I couldn't see that selection criteria
the news doesn't reveal these draft protection often...
作者: $$88    時間: 2008-1-15 03:25 PM

Originally posted by 阿感 at 2008-1-12 07:45 PM:
熱火打成咁,都入唔荒入到playoff啦,呢場就咁輸埋佢,博選秀佢好過啦

[ Last edited by 阿感 on 2008-1-12 at 10:17 PM ]

冇錯,熱火太令人失望
作者: 艾力克    時間: 2008-1-18 10:39 PM

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2008-1-12 08:01 AM:
NBA 史無前例地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HAWKS...
呢個重賽將於下次和HAWKS碰頭時比賽之前舉行
咁如果追番和打加時, 咁跟住場比賽咪有排都打唔倒, 打到攰晒喎
會唔會依51.9秒好快會有人foul out呢?
作者: 艾力克    時間: 2008-2-7 11:31 PM

依場重賽係因為熱火中鋒o'neal五犯就被foul出場, 所以上訴得直後決定重賽最後51.9秒
但而家o'neal走左, marion同banks都唔打得依場波, 令到場波變得更加無意義




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0