if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！& p; I8 G) u! U% a
8 D ]" }4 D* k2 ~+ E7 e) a只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 2 H% Q7 S# P! i( X5 K+ f不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 e) m+ n& B/ C( g
3 J- }# p) l' Q9 M# ]) Z; O) \
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ 9 }7 ~- \7 E5 x- h( n! _8 s" R. U4 f8 j% X( e. \5 Q* O. P
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? % t' B# h3 n0 g, [# O7 n* \7 p3 V
; u; G _' F7 N) c P; t) s
- p! c8 h7 S4 M- O2 [3 {( e
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片," N6 W- _6 B R3 i
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....8 M/ k1 m) O* E/ m) h+ W7 T
8 K1 o" ^ |% n: }! Y" v2 l
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 9 M' S) i- ^% Q: V( |On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 3 x Q L& Y9 W- F- C8 g- GWell, just my personal comments. * N, j4 r% l8 m$ Q$ k; ^* B ) [. t& [2 ^7 QHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過... ; I- M, v+ ]2 I/ p7 q0 z6 H. ?* f: s你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
% t' B# h3 n0 g, [# O7 n* \7 p3 V
