if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ ! A+ o/ U! Z$ g9 V! ` j& u4 Y7 t3 P3 U! q4 [
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 D: y7 q& w/ E; |( K3 F/ W不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 0 K% U' l" r# [) L/ j7 B " e& m( p y4 ~/ T! `8 q) K強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！! T9 b6 {/ Y7 }. D
8 ^3 @: B8 u' ]( b
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? . F4 T: P6 m1 m, p- J3 g
: R/ v" Y2 p9 c' v$ F 0 H/ T4 [1 |" F$ }: U8 GI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, & @& N7 ^ N) ^$ W4 Xand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... : u( D) N: r7 O, z: O9 H: I" [% P3 a h. h8 F/ Q5 |3 PI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. / b2 j/ y8 ]4 [5 E* ? P0 yOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 6 O, C- c: T1 [: M: o I1 ]Well, just my personal comments. j; R' g: k8 K" `! @/ w, W $ R" x$ q6 o. S7 @# {7 }/ K) |* {9 hHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
. F4 T: P6 m1 m, p- J3 g
