Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
' V6 D' f1 T  U% p, c( \
. F# a$ V  z5 G, |毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.* ^6 d8 Q& ~) F* y
! M( ~0 x9 v2 G
對打人者只作出警告了事.
- K- b/ D: p( ?/ f
4 G, D% G! J) J差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
0 Z" S, g4 z% y% @; w% x9 S  D7 Z& [% V9 y, ?! `
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
/ T, i2 J  i  s' z$ e' d
; A0 X  \4 ?- E而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
, A( u: @) [9 Z; Z. r8 O5 s( d. i" W# Z' A1 T. ]* o
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.7 G/ q) e4 C1 C0 s2 r* L, D
6 K# A" P' ^1 {, i% ]; i
, H' u8 [# a$ Z" ^" M4 ^; V

% K8 G  h* M3 J% `6 E6 }個人認為.....
+ U2 d0 S+ M" M; v
  n& k! c$ C. Y7 F8 y, W) T+ P岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番), w' t4 h( a: Q6 V9 G7 K) H
9 y% s! p0 M1 \+ R1 K; k" J
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....
* F- K3 f) M1 k& H- Q
% X1 [2 ~# g9 H' |  J" r9 h$ ^8 B
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
  Z, K" m3 ~6 ado you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?6 t- d2 V3 M2 K* m
are you the witness of the incident?2 K; u5 Y. z) i1 p
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..8 s& {0 `: k" Q1 y- c  o
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".4 e* C! H) e) t" _' I# s# W
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:8 B3 I' c- a2 u+ k
have u studied law or anything rela...
( J6 u! g% c* J# J, t  w
( v6 T) V" p3 h$ u: E$ T9 V黑字 : 係轉貼9 @$ D2 ~" W/ |( _: Q, e! O

' z, t2 E/ i, N紅字 : 個人感想* U( O0 q. q' d
/ H: b6 Q6 Z% {+ v7 g" y
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval % l! v# G6 c6 q0 ]7 C6 l; K- d' a
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.) o( p3 `! a2 W4 E* x, j2 }& b# K
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
3 T  x$ h& c, ljust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
+ M1 i# h: ]5 xgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
/ y) W9 b  \1 f! `3 z該警員明顯地想息事寧人...1 i, I7 r  O$ k& ?: I
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得7 e, s- @  {9 T# ~' n. ~/ r4 Z
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間! c% e( R' c: a
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
0 v9 E0 I& T5 E2 l6 ^( U我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
) Q. N$ s- D  Y; R  }( {該警員的處理手法絕對洽當$ r7 Y% G" ^+ ^, h
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x1 K: V! A* r) m" f6 G/ x6 ?  {
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0