Board logo

標題: 邀請超級球星來港啦 [打印本頁]

作者: Charcoal_henry    時間: 2008-7-9 09:48 PM     標題: 邀請超級球星來港啦

南華羅生成日話請日本國腳,一陣又巴西國腳,但都請係唔倒,好心俾多少少啦....

十幾年前蘇格蘭國腳麥艾雲尼來踢南華, 大球場即爆...
作者: SCM    時間: 2008-7-9 09:54 PM

今時唔同往日
當年香港都算係亞洲足球王國

依家要請超級球星 個個係歐洲都話係"天價"
要請真係唔易
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-7-9 10:18 PM

the problem is, even if the player just cost 10000, when your return is less than 10000, who's gonna pay for it? (in view of an investment)
for eg, if real madrid bought c.ron for 70m, their return should be greater than that amount.
football is just a piece of business nowadays, footballers are assets, there are also managers, board of directors and owners, some might even go public into stock market. It's not just the game matters the direction of the club, it's "profit".
Just ask yourself, which player should a HK football club to purchase and they can get the money back in a few years? and is that possible to do so?
作者: arthur8088    時間: 2008-7-9 10:46 PM

it's diffferent..HKG was British Colony in the past...it would be easier for British billionaires to invite those retiring stars to play in hkg....LIke they could even invite George Best to play in HKg~~even he was 36 already...and Dusburry from Man utd~~

and agreed with soccer is closely related to business now...if there's no profit or gimmick, the board would defintely reject of spending so much to sign a star now...especially in hkg~~coz watching soccer is not the only entertainment now~~
作者: eric911    時間: 2008-7-9 11:40 PM

道理很易明。即是曼城用俾20萬磅周薪引細哨,最後細哨都拒絕左﹗又即係如果樓主是C朗,羅先生肯俾20萬磅周薪你,而皇馬又俾同一周薪你,咁你去邊間呢?錢是重要,但對一位30多歲就要退休的足球員來說,前途就更重要了。就算得10萬磅周薪,細哨都會去AC唔去曼城啦。即係話羅先生唔係唔積極,只係冇球員咁蠢去香港踢波者﹗




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0