娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 徐嘉諾真係得 [打印本頁]

作者: dawander3r 時間: 2008-8-19 03:45 AM 標題: 徐嘉諾真係得

好少轉去亞視，Bros 唔講都唔記得有個徐嘉諾。唔係講笑，徐嘉諾真係得。
無線垃圾的話，明珠重垃圾。悶就尤自可，但個評述員永遠講唔出名，真係睇到扯火。講唔出個名都講個位置哎，又講唔出。完全唔做功課。
徐嘉諾除左識點樣去講一場波之外，籃球知識又達到水準，識分悉俾你聽個即時局面係點，人地用乜野戰術，另一方可用乜野戰術。球員的特質，打開邊隊等等。
唔似潘淦華和中國球員，無乜籃球知識。
When people are full court pressing you, you make outlet pass to bring the ball up court as soon as possible. And it is not hard to do that because when the guard got doubled by the opponenet, that means 1 of ya teammates must be wide opened at the mean time. There must be a weak side. It is a 2-sided blade man. You may make a quick 3-on-2 power run by distributing the ball up court quick as there is usually only 2 men staying under the basket for defense. It was really late to learn that from the coach's belated instruction. Also, the point guard was so stupid to run into the strong side where another man were waiting to trap him down with the man guarding the ball currently. And the helpful teammates all stayed in the front court waiting for the ball to come like normal time while just letting the point guard, the only man staying in their own half, with 2 defenders pressing on him and another 1 staying in the half court line waiting to intercept the ball. They were lucky that the Greek didn't use the full court press well enough as they shouldn't have stayed in front of the Chinese waiting for the pass at the far side. You always stay behind the men to intercept the long pass, otherwise, if they make a through pass and you will be letting the man run away easily and lose points just like soccer.
The Chinese guards are really weak. It's always the weak point of the team.
The coach of the China team maybe really good at training the players, but his on-court coaching is quite disappointing. He should've given more instructions on court. The coach should also teach the players more knowledge of different plays they may face of and how to go against these plays. The strength of the American are that they are always very systematic. The coaches in the States have a deep knowledge of various plays and tactics on hand, if they do that to the Chinese, it would be definitely more a mismatch as the Chinese players cannot respond at all when they are facing something that they never seen before. Now, this is the weakness of the Chinese team, they are lack of a drive to improve. I guess they always think it's enough to what they have right now from the experience gained in the Chinese league. Again, the world is big. Just keep training the shooting skill is not able to compete in the world stage.

潘淦華 is really disqualified to be a commentator man. He does not have as much knowledge as 徐嘉諾. I've seen him coaching several times. He never gives on-court instruction too. I've seen him just murmuring to his kid on the bench that "Player A shouldn't do this, player B shouldn't do that ma, sigh....." while his team was also in a situation which they got overrun by their opponent's full court press as well. Um...you are the coach man, you should give the instructions to the players on the floor which they should and shouldn't do and design a resolution to change the current situation. He should take some coaching courses man. If he did, then I'm sorry to say that he may not capable of coaching. Just like warriors in the past, if you are not born to be a general type of person, you are unable to become what a general should be even you fight really good.

我亦都對亞視既評術團另眼相看。完本我覺得阿樓南光不斷搭嗲好煩，點知佢之後講既一番說話實在太好啦。佢話講呢場比賽可以用另一個角度去睇架。就像佢呢d唔識籃球既人可以以問題方式同徐嘉諾互動，從而令徐嘉諾在他的講解帶出更多籃球知識給觀眾。因為未必個個觀眾都識籃球 (好似果度除左徐嘉諾之外都無人識籃球) 或未必了解得咁深入。你識打未必識策略性既play。徐嘉諾又帶出一些以前和現在術語的分別。並不是一味講邊個宜家帶緊波，邊個邊個射啦咁死版沉悶。一有機會，佢又肯主動同其他人互動。好似講經濟效益，就即刻話阿顧老闆就明啦，令顧老闆可以吹兩句。其他唔識籃球果d人又唔會因無野講，求其講埋d廢話。又唔似無線的人爭野講。真的好有團隊精神。我真的另眼相看，佢地久唔久都有d傑作。

作者: cfccfcc 時間: 2008-8-19 08:24 AM

原帖由 dawander3r 於 2008-8-19 03:45 AM 發表
好少轉去亞視，Bros 唔講都唔記得有個徐嘉諾。唔係講笑，徐嘉諾真係得。
無線垃圾的話，明珠重垃圾。悶就尤自可，但個評述員永遠講唔出名，真係睇到扯火。講唔出個名都講個位置哎，又講唔出。完全唔做功課。
徐嘉諾除左識點樣去 ...

應該係翁金華
佢都算ok啦
不過講籃球最正都係張歪德

作者: leeleelee2005 時間: 2008-8-19 08:38 AM

徐嘉諾梗係掂啦,以前佢o係NBA地帶講波，仲有蔡錦豐同張丕德，不過好似去左ESPN。
p.s:唔明點解亞視唔玩nba，亞視當年呢個體育節目最煞食。

作者: Erocky 時間: 2008-8-19 09:57 AM

原帖由 leeleelee2005 於 2008-8-19 08:38 AM 發表
徐嘉諾梗係掂啦,以前佢o係NBA地帶講波，仲有蔡錦豐同張丕德，不過好似去左ESPN。
p.s:唔明點解亞視唔玩nba，亞視當年呢個體育節目最煞食。

係啦, 果時NBA地帶徐嘉諾都唔知講得幾好~~

張丕德都係偷佢師架咋~
我仲記得初初NBA地帶做果時只係得張丕德同一個男仔同女仔~
果時張丕德都仲未識講波 (其餘兩個更加唔洗講),
俾人投訴到爆~~
然后先叫徐嘉諾黎講先無事~

張丕德跟左徐嘉諾講左幾年,
吸收哂經驗, 仲自成一格,
然后先過左ESPN~

所以徐嘉諾真係掂, 令人口服心服~~

作者: waynewi 時間: 2008-8-19 11:02 PM

唔單止講籃球~NBA啦~
佢講其他項目都唔差~
Tennis~乒乓~Volley~
有邊樣佢講唔出戰術既名?
而且~個位球員既往績、歷史~佢都講得出~
因為佢我除非迫到不得已~如果唔係我都冇乜轉台~

(亦因為佢我知道左肥谷都講得下...
其實我想係各位講奧運個post到講...但...各位支持無記既聲音都頗大...
如果各位有幸睇到亞視再播tennis既節目~而肥谷又係到~
真係可以停一停~聽多一陣~
因為~佢特別講tennis~真係有果個"講波"既款係到囉~
戰術~技術既名同埋個功效佢都講哂出黎~
另外~[呢樣其他項目佢都會]~就係佢真係明白平凡大眾唔識d乜~[可能因為佢既認識都係咁平凡...]
會出聲問徐嘉諾邊到唔明~而且好多時都問下...
唔係好次隔離d姐仔好冇sense咁亂up~唔係就 "好波" 就係 "哇!!!")

作者: xavi 時間: 2008-8-20 12:09 AM

原帖由 Erocky 於 2008-8-19 09:57 AM 發表

係啦, 果時NBA地帶徐嘉諾都唔知講得幾好~~

張丕德都係偷佢師架咋~
我仲記得初初NBA地帶做果時只係得張丕德同一個男仔同女仔~
果時張丕德都仲未識講波 (其餘兩個更加唔洗講),
俾人投訴到爆~~
然后先叫徐嘉諾黎講 ...

好似係姚嘉莉

作者: Y2G 時間: 2008-8-20 12:42 AM

徐嘉諾講NBA時至正,今次除左籃球佢連其他項目都評得頭頭是道,絕對係專業評述員~

作者: akakak777 時間: 2008-8-20 12:55 AM

個人5知點解5多仲2 張比得特別係佢個句 "xx彊到 ya xx" 超難頂

作者: vv1668vv 時間: 2008-8-22 12:03 AM

做足功课。。。了解熟知球场上每一角落。
不知道大家有没有发觉
除了 NBA ...他评述其他的比赛例如。。网球也很到家呢

胜而不骄大将之风

作者: dawander3r 時間: 2008-8-22 12:24 AM

原帖由 leeleelee2005 於 2008-8-19 08:38 AM 發表
徐嘉諾梗係掂啦,以前佢o係NBA地帶講波，仲有蔡錦豐同張丕德，不過好似去左ESPN。
p.s:唔明點解亞視唔玩nba，亞視當年呢個體育節目最煞食。

蔡錦豐係唔係個高佬？好似打過甲組
佢都講得ok，拍徐嘉諾就梗係最好配搭, 就似NBA地帶果時。

作者: donald15 時間: 2008-8-22 01:22 AM

無記跟本唔適合做體育
搵keyman過黎得物無所用
波又無得佢講就算有既都要拖住個唔識講過又要扮識既鍾志光
有大賽就加個不知所謂既陳百祥大佬人地睇緊波睇緊奧運你咪亂講野啦
依家睇體育節目唔係睇綜藝節目呀
對住呢班騎呢怪亞視都唔贏就真係摺得啦
徐嘉諾係亞視咁多年不停"補習"
本來淨係識籃球同排球
依家學下學下羽毛球、乒乓波、網球、足球都掂
就連田徑都有小小功力
無線咁多年出過咁多評術員有得幾多個係真係熟悉講緊o個樣野架
我就真係數唔出啦
徐嘉諾既成功無記既失敗
好大程度係因為慣性收視
無線做乜都大把人睇樣樣野都求求其其
亞視就默默耕云
邊邊係全力以赴做到做好呢次睇得好清楚啦

作者: 屠膠含三世 時間: 2008-8-22 01:27 AM

原帖由 xavi 於 2008-8-20 12:09 AM 發表

好似係姚嘉莉

係藝人出生的王艷娜同李潤祺

徐嘉諾最創先河係幫好多球員改花名

甚麼二哥柏賓, 入樽聖手, 死光鎗等

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)