娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝 [打印本頁]

作者: hizaku 時間: 2009-9-3 02:19 AM 標題: 罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝

罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝

圖片附件: 1251570349756.gif (2009-9-3 02:19 AM, 2.5 MB) / 下載次數 59
http://26fun.com./bbs/attachment.php?aid=1394451&k=33cabbb2955195d68884eb18ef2ad0fb&t=1732488519&sid=0MaNIN

圖片附件: 1251570638877.gif (2009-9-3 02:19 AM, 1.9 MB) / 下載次數 65
http://26fun.com./bbs/attachment.php?aid=1394452&k=fd9dbdca65eaed47f9252aee9ed6a0f1&t=1732488519&sid=0MaNIN

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-3 02:32 AM

都估都有人會唔訓咁講....

咁點解唔post埋達斯華果一插d相?

我估就算連雲加, 都無用你呢個講法,

係因為當晚係艾蒙尼亞自己犯上腦根錯誤, 去撲一球推過左都唔會即死既入攝, 明顯撲唔到波但撲到人, 朗尼衝果一刻有無存心一插我睇唔出,

但好明顯當晚些路迪KEEPER縮晒手, 波同人都high唔到, 而達斯華明顯地唔理你high唔high到我都存心一插...

作者: cfccfcc 時間: 2009-9-3 06:47 AM

Thats right
朗尼呢球係搏返黎
唔係插返黎

作者: brightlee 時間: 2009-9-3 07:27 AM

I need to say few things

I don't think Eduardo was diving, he never do any reaction after he got "block" down. I would prefer that's accident, rather than dive
I think that's a penalty for Rooney, that's a MUST, Arsenal GK did touch Rooney and block the running of Rooney, that's a yellow card offense.

And don't say English FA should charge back all the diving for players... if you say so, your world is really small and you are really immautre

how can you ask different Football Assossciatons (English FA) to charge any incidnets in UEFA (European football ass?)

they get completely different system....

作者: hizaku 時間: 2009-9-3 08:00 AM

did you all look at the left foot of Rooney in the 1st pic before commenting?

Eduardo is diving, he deserve to be punished

[ 本帖最後由 hizaku 於 2009-9-3 08:01 AM 編輯 ]

作者: fortressh 時間: 2009-9-3 09:58 AM

eduardo dived, so as rooney.
rooney already lost control of the ball. he had been kneeling down himself before he had contact with almunia.
i'm not talking about if the FAs should do anything. but just the game.

作者: SPACE2007 時間: 2009-9-3 02:26 PM

達斯華係插水, 好明顯冇掂到, 應該要罸, 但係我覺得最緊要係公平, 係唔係現行規矩係有人插水, 當場冇俾人發覺, 就可以追加補罸兩場停賽? 如果係, 應用到所有球會, 球員, 公平, 就冇問題, 否則, 達斯華就罸兩場, 其他球員, 唔駛罸, 係乜野原因?? 亦都有一處唔明, 點解當場俾人捉到就一個黃牌, 事後追究就停兩場??
朗尼都係插, 不過插得叻啲, 真係隻腳碰到守門員, 附合要求, 你好難話佢已經推離腳, 守門員已經縮手, 碰到就係碰到, 你個波明明出界, 你擺鳥龍頂入去, 都係入球。

作者: steven999 時間: 2009-9-3 06:56 PM

達斯華係插水
呢個冇得講
但係點解要罰???
唔好講今年
講返前兩年
謝老四 c朗 e巴杜奧巴等等
個個都插水啦
點解之前唔罰佢地
而家要罰達斯華
仲要達斯華一向都唔係一個成日插水既球員
咁c朗同杜奧巴呢???
成日睇波都見到佢兩個插水
又唔見罰下???

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-3 08:10 PM

原帖由 steven999 於 2009-9-3 06:56 PM 發表
達斯華係插水
呢個冇得講
但係點解要罰???
唔好講今年
講返前兩年
謝老四 c朗 e巴杜奧巴等等
個個都插水啦
點解之前唔罰佢地
而家要罰達斯華
仲要達斯華一向都唔係一個成日插水既球員
咁c朗同杜奧巴呢???
成日睇波 ...

哩個世界都係'俾面派對'的啦!
就算好似某啲人長篇大論死硬派一邊...都唔可以否認哩樣嘢!
雲加被罰完出場仲要俾個球證小三小四甘,點解?
因為佢對住個"SIR"嘛!!今時今日睇吓倒轉情況會唔會發生!!!
朗里嗰球,係唔係十二碼,我個人就認為俾同唔俾都可接受..(佢甩咗腳啦!但又話個籠冇縮手嘛!!)...講真,上半場沙皇嗰球,佢係特登摶十二碼....而係真係俾人鏟到成個飛起...嗰腳更加應該係十二碼!!實果係點??根本冇人會提起!!
因為根本冇得話公平!!個球證唔可以話佢知沙皇特登摶就唔判的嘛!又唔見個後位縮腳?!咪一樣冇判!!
所以根本唔駛考究點解佢又,點解佢唔係!
就算好似啲人扮晒分柝.....其實一樣自圓其說!!你支持一邊,永遠會有大量理由去support,人人都係一樣!
所以好心嗰啲人,唔好扮晒中立啦!!邊有中立o架!!

[ 本帖最後由 HansChan 於 2009-9-3 08:12 PM 編輯 ]

作者: hizaku 時間: 2009-9-3 08:18 PM

Hanschan speaks the truth

作者: samuriapoon 時間: 2009-9-3 09:31 PM

I dun think it is not fair to Eduardo being penalized diving after the match as seems never happened to other players before (or could it be the worst diving ever?)

For Rooney's case, the keeper definitely have a lot more body contact with rooney even after he so-called "intend to dive". I dun think two cases can be compared with.

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-3 09:51 PM

原帖由 HansChan 於 2009-9-3 08:10 PM 發表

哩個世界都係'俾面派對'的啦!
就算好似某啲人長篇大論死硬派一邊...都唔可以否認哩樣嘢!
雲加被罰完出場仲要俾個球證小三小四甘,點解?
因為佢對住個"SIR"嘛!!今時今日睇吓倒轉情況會唔會發生!!!
朗里嗰球,係唔係十 ...

首先申報我d血非常深紅!!

因為阿saf 係 sir, 球證要比面? 我見佢好似條狗咁比人趕上公眾席都不知多少次,
就上季都因為衰口多仲被人罰左幾場波, 何處體現出 "爵士特權" ?

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-3 09:56 PM

原帖由 steven999 於 2009-9-3 06:56 PM 發表
達斯華係插水
呢個冇得講
但係點解要罰???
唔好講今年
講返前兩年
謝老四 c朗 e巴杜奧巴等等
個個都插水啦
點解之前唔罰佢地
而家要罰達斯華
仲要達斯華一向都唔係一個成日插水既球員
咁c朗同杜奧巴呢???
成日睇波 ...

因為蘇格蘭足總投訴，唔做野唔得...

作者: 自由神 時間: 2009-9-3 09:57 PM

Fair Game???
其實無咩所謂啦...
職業足球早就已經唔係運動咁簡單~

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-3 09:58 PM

原帖由 brightlee 於 2009-9-3 07:27 AM 發表
I need to say few things

I don't think Eduardo was diving, he never do any reaction after he got "block" down. I would prefer that's accident, rather than dive
I think that's a penalty for Rooney, th ...

喂達斯華唔係插唔同意, 我上YOUTUBE睇多次都係覺得佢插, 你專業都好, 今次唔鬼信你...

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-3 09:59 PM

原帖由 自由神 於 2009-9-3 09:57 PM 發表
Fair Game???
其實無咩所謂啦...
職業足球早就已經唔係運動咁簡單~

咁係咩? 我既 "研究打假波" 神經被觸動...

作者: germ 時間: 2009-9-3 11:14 PM

原帖由 fortressh 於 2009-9-3 09:58 AM 發表
eduardo dived, so as rooney.
rooney already lost control of the ball. he had been kneeling down himself before he had contact with almunia.
i'm not talking about if the FAs should do anything. but ...

you observation is as good as eduardo's diving

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-4 08:00 AM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-3 09:51 PM 發表

首先申報我d血非常深紅!!

因為阿saf 係 sir, 球證要比面? 我見佢好似條狗咁比人趕上公眾席都不知多少次,
就上季都因為衰口多仲被人罰左幾場波, 何處體現出 "爵士特權" ? ...

又來了~~~~~
唔駛甘敏感!!
你當我啲嘢係廢話黎得o架喇,橫掂我都以甘既目光去睇你嗰啲!!
唔駛甘大反應!!你d血係深紅??真係關人"隱士"咩!!

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-4 10:34 AM

原帖由 HansChan 於 2009-9-4 08:00 AM 發表

又來了~~~~~
唔駛甘敏感!!
你當我啲嘢係廢話黎得o架喇,橫掂我都以甘既目光去睇你嗰啲!!
唔駛甘大反應!!你d血係深紅??真係關人"隱士"咩!!

sorry, 反應大既好似係你, not me

你絕對可以當我既野係"廢話", 但我唔會當你既說話係"廢話",
此乃個人自由與修養問題...

我回你貼係for討論問題, 你可以回覆或者當無睇過,
但如果你想搵交嗌我係樂意奉陪!!

作者: Shaqleung 時間: 2009-9-4 11:32 AM

我諗EDUARDO插水就無得拗架啦.....至於駛唔駛罰,其實又真係有D大細超.

ROONEY插水....有D大纜都扯唔埋. 1. 果球都真係有CONTACT,先唔好理掂到前ROONEY有冇諗住跌. 2. 係ALMUNIA自己既錯.其實之後ALMUNIA都無同球證拗.我諗呢樣都好具說服力. 3. 雖然無咩關係,但係以ROONEY既往績,佢係插水王嗎?

其實講插水,唔知有冇人諗下EBOUE臨俾人換出唻之前果球插水又點呢?ARSENAL班球員又係咪有少少插水癮?

講到最後,FLETCHER鏟低ARSHAVIN果球十二碼無吹,WENGER好似耿耿於懷.仲話球證大細超,又話曼聯無體育精神,淨係係咁犯規,但係ARSENAL反而多三張黃牌.

回想下,EBOUE插水,ALMUNIA輸十二碼,SAGNA鬧球證....咁樣多三張. 咁都算大細超?

有時候鬧人都要有足夠理據.

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-4 12:51 PM

原帖由 Shaqleung 於 2009-9-4 11:32 AM 發表
我諗EDUARDO插水就無得拗架啦.....至於駛唔駛罰,其實又真係有D大細超.

ROONEY插水....有D大纜都扯唔埋. 1. 果球都真係有CONTACT,先唔好理掂到前ROONEY有冇諗住跌. 2. 係ALMUNIA自己既錯.其實之後ALMUNIA都無同球證 ...

上面有人講得好, 呢球唔係插, 係博番黎...

球波根本有少少甩, 就算追到都無咩射門角度, 佢係見almunia咁on居出黎, 索性推快d咁解, 總之妳一碰到我, 我咁行想唔趺都唔得....
佢個意式係想個龍撲趺佢多過想過龍門, 因為前者易好多...

但講往績, rooney都有, 當年阿仙奴之跨季不敗身.... 就係奧脫福衰係條衰仔一插手上....

雲加發癲你唔洗理佢啦, 佢自己早排都認為左d球員會吹水講野架啦...
老費果時輸比雲加, 可嘗唔係賴呢樣賴果樣, 個場太硬都有得講....

所以話只要一日仲係老費對雲加...阿仙奴對曼聯永遠好睇.

作者: steven999 時間: 2009-9-4 05:07 PM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-4 12:51 PM 發表

上面有人講得好, 呢球唔係插, 係博番黎...

球波根本有少少甩, 就算追到都無咩射門角度, 佢係見almunia咁on居出黎, 索性推快d咁解, 總之妳一碰到我, 我咁行想唔趺都唔得....
佢個意式係想個龍撲趺佢多過想過龍門, ...

費sir輸波既言論真係好正
呢幾年輸波成日賴球證
印象中係舊年歐聯輸俾巴塞冇賴過咋

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-4 08:00 PM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-4 10:34 AM 發表

sorry, 反應大既好似係你, not me

你絕對可以當我既野係"廢話", 但我唔會當你既說話係"廢話",
此乃個人自由與修養問題...

我回你貼係for討論問題, 你可以回覆或者當無睇過,
但如果你想搵交嗌我係樂意 ...

我服你的!!
我一啲都冇諗過要同你嗌交....唔好誤會!!
回駁廢話只會有更多廢話出現,甘大家都唔好!
"for討論問題"呢下嘢呢...你自己覺得你自己係咪係囉!
forum係公開既!
我真係以睇廢話既心理去睇你啲嘢的..哩個你要同'修養'掛扣,都冇你辦法的!我唔認啲話係廢話我就真好虛偽!!!
要死硬派甘討論.....冇意思!
要唔理解別人意思,胡亂斷章取意去反駁,更加冇意思!
我講既嘢係甘多喇師兄!

作者: bigfish 時間: 2009-9-4 08:05 PM

為何阿迷只懂得怨天尤人?
如果佢地專心踢波, 今季都仲可以保住 top 5 位置, 你睇人地曼城, 熱刺, 維拉已經準備取而代之 la

作者: bigfish 時間: 2009-9-4 08:06 PM

原帖由 steven999 於 2009-9-4 05:07 PM 發表

費sir輸波既言論真係好正
呢幾年輸波成日賴球證
印象中係舊年歐聯輸俾巴塞冇賴過咋

你點解釋球證不斷的誤判同雙重標準?!

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-4 10:40 PM

原帖由 HansChan 於 2009-9-4 08:00 PM 發表

我服你的!!
我一啲都冇諗過要同你嗌交....唔好誤會!!
回駁廢話只會有更多廢話出現,甘大家都唔好!
"for討論問題"呢下嘢呢...你自己覺得你自己係咪係囉!
forum係公開既!
我真係以睇廢話既心理去睇你啲嘢的..哩個你要 ...

咁你自己數下你打左幾多隻字咁大把, 係討論緊 "罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝 " 呢條題lor,
我回你第一個post完全係講緊波, 完全無半點挑釁過你, 係你上左頭搵交黎嘈....

連當我既說話係廢話, 你都要用2大個post黎回, 你唔係搵交黎嘈係咩?

你會唔會掉左舊垃圾, 係個垃圾筒度執番佢出黎, 同佢講 "我當你係垃圾黎咋", 仲要講兩次??

唔知你發生左咩事, 你要玩野我未必要倍你, 我唔玩啦, 你唔順既可以繼續 !!

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-4 10:43 PM

原帖由 bigfish 於 2009-9-4 08:05 PM 發表
為何阿迷只懂得怨天尤人?
如果佢地專心踢波, 今季都仲可以保住 top 5 位置, 你睇人地曼城, 熱刺, 維拉已經準備取而代之 la

我撐阿仙奴, 季季我都當佢係曼聯勁敵....

曼城? 今季番住鄉下先啦唔該....

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-4 10:55 PM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-4 10:40 PM 發表

咁你自己數下你打左幾多隻字咁大把, 係討論緊 "罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝 " 呢條題lor,
我回你第一個post完全係講緊波, 完全無半點挑釁過你, 係你上左頭搵交黎嘈....

連當我既說話係廢話, 你都要用2大 ...

都話咗你敏感啦,師兄!!
邊有人會同你嘈咬先得格!要同你嘈嗰啲分明攞黎賤!!邊有人會夠你嘈先得o架?!
咪甘敏感!!

唔係多字就叫回應題目既!!

[ 本帖最後由 HansChan 於 2009-9-4 10:56 PM 編輯 ]

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-4 11:11 PM

原帖由 HansChan 於 2009-9-4 10:55 PM 發表

都話咗你敏感啦,師兄!!
邊有人會同你嘈咬先得格!要同你嘈嗰啲分明攞黎賤!!邊有人會夠你嘈先得o架?!
咪甘敏感!!

唔係多字就叫回應題目既!! ...

呢個post叫 " "罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝 "

你要搵交嘈既, 去開一版攻擊我, 到時你可以開100個貼話我講d係廢話都得, 小弟無任歡迎!!

請你唔好係呢版討論度, 阻住其他朋友討論!!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-4 11:14 PM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-4 11:11 PM 發表

呢個post叫 " "罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝 "

你要搵交嘈既, 去開一版攻擊我, 到時你可以開100個貼話我講d係廢話都得, 小弟無任歡迎!!

請你唔好係呢版討論度, 阻住其他朋友討論!! ...

師兄唔好勞氣!
岩岩先同你解釋完...為何又要諗埋一邊呢?
對題目既意見已發表了!!
多謝提醒!!
開100 個貼話你既提議唔係甘好...太抬舉你了!

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-4 11:20 PM

原帖由 HansChan 於 2009-9-4 11:14 PM 發表

師兄唔好勞氣!
岩岩先同你解釋完...為何又要諗埋一邊呢?
對題目既意見已發表了!!
多謝提醒!!
開100 個貼話你既提議唔係甘好...太抬舉你了!

"罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝 "

我真係唔想同你嘈, 要嘈請你出去第版, 呢版, 請講番波!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-4 11:28 PM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-4 11:20 PM 發表

"罰 Eduardo 插水? 好, 罰埋朗尼, 謝謝 "

我真係唔想同你嘈, 要嘈請你出去第版, 呢版, 請講番波!

你識唔識中文的?
解釋咗多次了........
你還是算了吧!!

作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2009-9-4 11:31 PM

stop!
歡迎過隔離港男私片
唔扣分仲會有分加
謝!

其他版友繼續討論Topic

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-4 11:35 PM

原帖由 kakeidevil 於 2009-9-4 11:31 PM 發表
stop!
歡迎過隔離港男私片
唔扣分仲會有分加
謝!

其他版友繼續討論Topic

喂, 你唔好遲d, 你快幾分鐘都慳番我d力打字.....

anyway, thx for stop us!!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-5 12:00 AM

原帖由 kakeidevil 於 2009-9-4 11:31 PM 發表
stop!
歡迎過隔離港男私片
唔扣分仲會有分加
謝!

其他版友繼續討論Topic

誤會黎既啫,誤會黎既啫!!
討論長篇大論唔緊要,
但長篇大論否認,斷章取義去搞麻煩,我比較難接受!!
又遇岩今日興之所至,俾人話,又唔想太沉默,所以講多咗幾句!
見諒,見諒!!

作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2009-9-5 12:36 AM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-4 11:35 PM 發表

喂, 你唔好遲d, 你快幾分鐘都慳番我d力打字.....

anyway, thx for stop us!!

睇緊你點1揪10嘛

作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2009-9-5 12:37 AM

原帖由 HansChan 於 2009-9-5 12:00 AM 發表

誤會黎既啫,誤會黎既啫!!
討論長篇大論唔緊要,
但長篇大論否認,斷章取義去搞麻煩,我比較難接受!!
又遇岩今日興之所至,俾人話,又唔想太沉默,所以講多咗幾句!
見諒,見諒!! ...

明咖喇bro

作者: amigofans 時間: 2009-9-5 03:13 AM

原帖由 kakeidevil 於 2009-9-5 12:36 AM 發表

睇緊你點1揪10嘛

多得你啦, 累我比人圍....

就係衰在多口同你玩....

好在我生命力強......

作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2009-9-5 10:29 AM

原帖由 filter-052fans 於 2009-9-5 03:13 AM 發表

多得你啦, 累我比人圍....

就係衰在多口同你玩....

好在我生命力強......

你把口都幾吹得
入港男兜個圈丫

呢度比番版友講波經

作者: hizaku 時間: 2009-9-6 12:39 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u38DykT_kYY

this says it all

作者: HansChan 時間: 2009-9-6 03:09 PM

原帖由 hizaku 於 2009-9-6 12:39 PM 發表
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u38DykT_kYY

this says it all

哈.....
甘就....兩次獨立事件黎既....
不過今次....條友好似係一邊拉人,一道扮跌似的.....

作者: brightlee 時間: 2009-9-15 05:20 AM

Arsenal striker Eduardo has won his appeal over a two-match ban for diving during the Champions League play-off win over Celtic.

The Croatia international was accused of duping the referee into awarding the penalty which gave Arsenal the opening goal of the game at the Emirates on August 26.

Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger was furious with UEFA's decision to ban the player from their opening two group games away to Standard Liege and playing host to Olympiakos. He claimed there had been a media "witch hunt" against his player to make sure action was taken.

Wenger has now been vindicated by UEFA's decision to over-turn the decision.

A statement on UEFA's website read: "The UEFA Appeals body today accepted the appeal lodged by Arsenal FC against the two-match suspension handed to striker Eduardo.

"Following examination of all the evidence, notably the declarations of both the referee and the referees' assessor, as well as the various video footage, it was not established to the panel's satisfaction that the referee had been deceived in taking his decision on the penalty.

"Therefore, the decision of the UEFA Control and Disciplinary Body of 1 September, in which the player was suspended for two UEFA club competition matches, is annulled.''

Eduardo said: "I certainly feel relieved now. I have had great support from my family, friends and of course everyone at the club. Now I just want to forget about this and think about our match against Standard Liege on Wednesday. I was always prepared for the match in Belgium because I had good feeling and I always remained positive about the outcome.

"Now we have a final result, I can now look forward to helping the team on Wednesday night.

"All I remember of the incident is that as soon as I had possession of the ball I headed towards goal at full speed. I was very close to the Celtic keeper and felt contact on my foot and then lost my balance. I know perhaps more than anyone else that when you have contact at speed it can be dangerous.

"I just want to say that I'm a fair player. To score goals you must take your opportunities and I'm not the type of player who needs to be dishonest to score goals.''

A statement on Arsenal's website said: "We are grateful that the appeal body focused on the evidence and made the right decision in this case. We were able to show that there was contact between the goalkeeper and Eduardo and that the decision of the UEFA disciplinary body should be annulled.

"We fully support the drive for fair play in football and believe it is important that UEFA provide clear and comprehensive standards that will be consistently enforced going forward. We are glad to put this incident behind us and concentrate on the games ahead.''

What I said, it's right.....!!!!! I am saying this again, I am not bias.. and what I said in here, which is truth... video technology can't be used cos there could be different result if you see an incident in different angles!!

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)