娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [NEWS]UEFA重申堅持唔會改例比利物浦參加下屆歐聯 [打印本頁]

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 01:06 AM 標題: [NEWS]UEFA重申堅持唔會改例比利物浦參加下屆歐聯

UEFA而家再次重申無意改例比利物浦參加下屆歐聯
UEFA既發言人William Gaillard同BBC電台5台講:我好同情利物浦,我都好想佢地係度,但係我地有規例
,另外我地無法改變利物浦既聯賽排名,再加上係英足總話愛華頓係以第四晉身歐聯外圍賽
再講番起00-01年皇家馬德里以第五完成聯賽,但係有得參加歐聯就係因為西班牙方面皇馬代替左薩拉戈薩個位
而利物浦領隊賓拿迪斯就重申利物浦應該被批準參加下屆既歐聯賽事
並且講:我地拎左歐聯,尼個係好常識地咁勝出者好應該有得衛冕。

最後,AC米蘭領隊安寮洛提都表態支持利物浦下年有得參加歐聯,並且衛冕

Uefa has insisted it has no plans to change its rules to allow Liverpool to defend their Champions League crown.
The Reds finished fifth in the Premiership - a place outside automatic qualification for the Champions League.

"I fully sympathise with the club and I would love to have them in there - but we have rules," Uefa spokesman William Gaillard told BBC Radio Five Live.

"We can't change them in the middle of the season. The FA has said Everton are the fourth English club to qualify."

Gaillard insisted that the precedent set in the 2000-01 season, when Real Madrid defended the trophy despite finishing fifth because the Spanish football federation decided to hand them Real Zaragoza's place, would make no difference.

But the English Football Assoctiation has pledged its support to Liverpool's quest for a Champions League place after the breathtaking win over AC Milan in Istanbul.

"We'll be keeping up a dialogue with Uefa, which we have been for the last couple of months," said FA chief executive Brian Barwick.

"What Uefa has, and I sympathise with it to a degree, is a situation where it is faced with not having its own champions in its own competition which is called the Champions League.

"Liverpool finished outside the top four. I think the FA was right and proper to put the top four in to the Champions League.

"We are more in a situation now of how do we, for good sporting reasons, find a way to persuade Uefa that it should find room for Liverpool?" added Barwick.

And Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez insisted his team should be allowed back into the Champions League next season.

"We have won the trophy. It is common sense that the winner should defend the title," said Benitez.

"It's quite unbelievable to even consider that a side who will play in the European Super Cup as well as the World Club Championship next season should not be allowed back into the Champions League."

Meanwhile, Liverpool chief executive Rick Parry has also made his own plea to Uefa: "Look at the support, the worldwide audience and the game.

"I think we have to be given a shot. We are worthy champions and I think that's what the world will say."

Liverpool get to keep the European Cup trophy after winning it for the fifth time by beating AC Milan on penalties.

But their participation in the competition has been in doubt since the Football Association decided that the top four in the Premiership would take up England's places next season.

Parry added: "At least we get to keep this one so they can't take it back off us if nothing else.

"You wouldn't have given a lot for our chances at half-time but the boys were absolutely magnificent.

"It's good to win it for the supporters because they were magnificent."

And Reds skipper Steven Gerrard added: "It is called the Champions League so the champions should be able to defend it."

AC Milan coach Carlo Ancelotti said: "Yes, I think they should be allowed to defend the title."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/europe/4581317.stm

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:13 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 01:06 AM:
UEFA而家再次重申無意改例比利物浦參...

下???

邊有比賽冇衛冕隊打架 ????

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 01:17 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:13 AM:

下???

邊有比賽冇衛冕隊打架 ????

佢地真係玩晒...............
之前整個d regulation同table係廢ge
明明白紙黑字講左冠軍可以衛冕
而家又話無

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:22 AM

有冇搞錯呀,咁攞冠軍黎做咩,個個打生打死黎做咩???

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:30 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 01:17 AM:

佢地真係玩晒...............
之前整個d regulation同table係廢ge
明明白紙黑字講左冠軍可以衛冕
而家又話無

UEFA 同英足總邊有理由唔俾利記打 ????

唉.........利記攞歐聯後又好可能做出另一果record 啦

UEFA 真係唔驚架 ???

利記冇得打, 全世界利迷分分鐘暴動架
我地唔使上街,
hack 爆UEFA 果website 話咁易 !!!!

利物浦, 歐聯下年唔可以冇你份架

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 01:32 AM

rm之前有得打,我地無,幾公平丫

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:32 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:30 AM:

UEFA 同英足總邊有理由唔俾利記...

不如愛華頓同利物浦踢場附加賽啦,邊隊好波(贏)咪邊隊打囉

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:33 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 01:32 AM:
rm之前有得打,我地無,幾公平丫

鬼叫皇馬係西班牙惡晒咩= ="......如果係今次主角係曼聯或阿仙奴的話,愛華頓一早冇得打

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:33 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:32 AM:

不如愛華頓同利物浦踢場附加賽啦,邊隊好波(贏)咪邊隊打囉

唔使啦

學 rm 咁算啦,

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:34 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:33 AM:

鬼叫皇馬係西班牙惡晒咩= ="......如果係今次主角係曼聯或阿仙奴的話,愛華頓一早冇得打

惡 ???

冇得打,

利迷一定暴動 !!!

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:35 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:33 AM:

唔使啦

學 rm 咁算啦,

但係皇馬係西班牙既地位點同依家利記係英倫既地位比呀= ="....

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:35 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:34 AM:

惡 ???

冇得打,

利迷一定暴動 !!!

最主要係兩邊足總都覺得就算比利記衛冕都唔會成功,所以根本唔想比利記入去踢= ="

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:37 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:35 AM:

最主要係兩邊足總都覺得就算比利記衛冕都唔會成功,所以根本唔想比利記入去踢= ="

下 ???

依果理由黎架 ???

今年都係咁啦,

利記米又係得左

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:38 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:37 AM:

下 ???

依果理由黎架 ???

今年都係咁啦,

利記米又係得左

所以根本冇一個合理既理由唔比利記試下衛冕

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:40 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:38 AM:

所以根本冇一個合理既理由唔比利記試下衛冕

冇錯 !!!!

利記一定要有得打呀 !!!!!!

過程咁傳奇, 冇得打真係唔抵

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:46 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:40 AM:

冇錯 !!!!

利記一定要有得打呀 !!!!!!

過程咁傳奇, 冇得打真係唔抵

希望足總公平d啦~~"

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 01:46 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:33 AM:

鬼叫皇馬係西班牙惡晒咩= ="......如果係今次主角係曼聯或阿仙奴的話,愛華頓一早冇得打

如果真係阿曼車是但一隊,我相信歐洲足協果邊易辦好多

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 01:46 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 01:46 AM:

如果真係阿曼車是但一隊,我相信歐洲足協果邊易辦好多

梗係啦......

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:47 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 01:46 AM:

如果真係阿曼車是但一隊,我相信歐洲足協果邊易辦好多

利記係就係口細d

但係利迷好勁 !!!!!

UEFA 小心d 果 server 啦

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 01:49 AM

總之就....................唉

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:53 AM

老實講,

愛華打歐聯真係浪費左果位,

佢外圍賽過唔過到都好有問題

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 01:55 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:53 AM:
老實講,

愛華打歐聯真係浪費左果位,

佢外圍賽過唔過到都好有問題

咁又唔係咁講既
有幾多隊恨都恨唔到,就算外圍賽出局都起碼叫打過,有$的

更何況唔比拖肥有好成績呢.........

作者: cream 時間: 2005-5-27 01:57 AM

of coz la..
Man U , Arsenal, Chelsea then definitely yes la
last year English FA says Arsenal and Chelsea can enter next year Champion League as winner
if they dun finish in top 4..(Man U has already out by that point..

)
It is just Liverpool is not BIG enough lor

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 01:58 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 01:55 AM:

咁又唔係咁講既
有幾多隊恨都恨唔到,就算外圍賽出局都起碼叫打過,有$的

更何況唔比拖肥有好成績呢.........

咁又係,

但總係覺得佢出去一定香

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 02:01 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 01:58 AM:

咁又係,

但總係覺得佢出去一定香

咁我都覺.......XD
如果外圍賽抽到對史浩克啊,西維爾啊,維拉里爾啊.......果d就好睇lor

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 02:06 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 02:01 AM:

咁我都覺.......XD
如果外圍賽抽到對史浩克啊,西維爾啊,維拉里爾啊.......果d就好睇lor

冇錯,

不過唔會架wo,

好似分種子架

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 02:08 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 02:06 AM:

冇錯,

不過唔會架wo,

好似分種子架

比喻姐...........

作者: homan~ 時間: 2005-5-27 02:10 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-5-27 02:08 AM:

比喻姐...........

sorry 呀

有會好好睇 !!!

作者: night 時間: 2005-5-27 02:18 AM

Originally posted by homan~ at 2005-5-27 02:10 AM:

sorry 呀

有會好好睇 !!!

作者: Asurada129 時間: 2005-5-27 04:20 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:32 AM:

不如愛華頓同利物浦踢場附加賽啦,邊隊好波(贏)咪邊隊打囉

甘又唔可以...這樣就對愛華頓唔公平

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-27 04:43 AM

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-5-27 04:20 AM:

甘又唔可以...這樣就對愛華頓唔公平

如果足協果邊真係死都唔比5隊參加既話,呢個方法係最好的><"

作者: ilovefuckingyou 時間: 2005-5-27 09:42 AM

有排攪呢鑊野,唔通everton讓個位俾佢咩...傻既!

睇黎都係無得衛冕多啦...:cool:

下年努力d打入前4把啦!

圖片附件: 20050526t173815z_01_nootr_rtrjonp_2_chinat1358111pic0.jpg (2005-5-27 09:42 AM, 23.2 KB) / 下載次數 3
http://26fun.com./bbs/attachment.php?aid=335833&k=a254a14c48f4fc6d3f4d92d6f9f02f77&t=1732437503&sid=k0Xv8v

作者: ilovefuckingyou 時間: 2005-5-27 09:43 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 04:43 AM:

如果足協果邊真係死都唔比5隊參加既話,呢個方法係最好的><"

咁對everton都唔公平,明明係第4有得打,點解要同你打附加賽俾機會你?

作者: ilovefuckingyou 時間: 2005-5-27 09:48 AM

應該係歐聯附加賽加多個位俾利記,要佢打多2場...入唔入到睇自己...無理由要everton讓路...講唔通!!!

作者: 一樓一 時間: 2005-5-27 09:55 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:22 AM:
有冇搞錯呀,咁攞冠軍黎做咩,個個打生打死黎做咩???

巴西係上屆世界杯盟主,  今屆都要打外圍賽啦!!  外圍賽如果唔惦,  一樣冇得衛冕!!
玩遊戲就要有規則!

唔好寫明係5年o既,  都要解釋做2年!

作者: jublio 時間: 2005-5-27 02:10 PM

皇馬o個年有得打,好似係因為讓俾佢o個隊同皇馬係同一個老闆.....

作者: 秋葉林 時間: 2005-5-27 02:27 PM

依家好似話威爾斯聯賽果隊冠軍唔知乜嘢﹙好似叫 TNS﹚想同利記隻揪，如果輸咗就讓個位俾利記，不過就要等兩地足總同 UEFA 同意先得。

作者: kaho1989 時間: 2005-5-27 02:34 PM

champion 都冇得打=.=

作者: 段云 時間: 2005-5-27 02:39 PM

Originally posted by 秋葉林 at 2005-5-27 02:27 PM:
依家好似話威爾斯聯賽果隊冠軍唔知乜嘢﹙好似叫 TNS﹚想同利記隻揪，如果輸咗就讓個位俾利記，不過就要等兩地足總同 UEFA 同意先得。

呢隊威爾斯既球隊個算盤打得幾響

佢再借埋卡迪夫千禧球場黎用，加Ｄ宣傳，
仲唔賺死佢地？反正佢地都去唔到分組賽，不如狠狠地賺返筆班費。

作者: ilovefuckingyou 時間: 2005-5-27 02:48 PM

Originally posted by 段云 at 2005-5-27 02:39 PM:

呢隊威爾斯既球隊個算盤打得幾響:...

可能仲打2回合,收2份$...幾識計數...

作者: VictorTan 時間: 2005-5-27 02:48 PM

叫欧洲之王打第二流足球就真系荒天下之大邈。
理由唔通。

作者: 段云 時間: 2005-5-27 02:55 PM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-27 02:48 PM:

可能仲打2回合,收2份$...幾識計數...

又賺到錢，又賺到知名度，又賺到利物浦既人情
唔做果個真係笨。

作者: 段云 時間: 2005-5-27 02:57 PM

Originally posted by VictorTan at 2005-5-27 02:48 PM:
叫欧洲之王打第二流足球就真系荒天下之大邈。
理由唔通。

更荒天下之大謬既係歐洲冠軍係英超只係能夠排第五

更何況利物浦打二流足球盃仔都未必一定攞冠軍

作者: VictorTan 時間: 2005-5-27 03:12 PM

Originally posted by 段云 at 2005-5-27 02:57 PM:

更荒天下之大謬既係歐洲冠軍係英超只係能夠排第五
更何況利物浦打二流足球盃仔都未必一定攞冠軍

国内赛通常更难打是因为知己知彼，
这是很基本的常识，唉.........小小常识都没有。
顺你意思！你赢！我不爱纠缠！

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-5-28 03:13 AM

太唔公平,利記同愛華頓都應該可以打歐聯,任何一方都唔可以缺少
佢地太唔完善,立例時完全冇諗過呢d 突發既事

作者: 段云 時間: 2005-5-28 06:04 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-5-28 03:13 AM:
太唔公平,利記同愛華頓都應該可以打歐聯,任何一方都唔可以缺少
佢地太唔完善,立例時完全冇諗過呢d 突發既事

我係另一個post已經貼左相關既條例
所以今次應該質疑既係點解英國足總寧願俾個位愛華頓而唔俾利物浦
Should Liverpool Be Allow To Defend Their Title ??

作者: fmchelloauntie 時間: 2005-5-28 07:58 AM

Originally posted by 一樓一 at 2005-5-27 09:55 AM:

巴西係上屆世界杯盟主,  今屆都要打外圍賽啦!!  外圍賽如果唔惦,  一樣冇得衛冕!!
玩遊戲就要有規則!

唔好寫明係5年o既,  都要解釋做2年!

講得口岩~
鬼叫你聯賽得個第五...
我唔係針對利記~
只不過大家好似有d偏幫左佢...
如果今年歐聯係俾"基富戴籣模"又或者係其他比較無名氣既球隊嬴左...而咁口岩佢地0係國內聯賽又踢得唔好...
應該唔會有咁多人出黎又話唔公平又話唔抵...

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-28 08:09 AM

Originally posted by fmchelloauntie at 2005-5-28 07:58 AM:

講得口岩~
鬼叫你聯賽得個第五...
...

咁利記依家連外圍賽資格都冇wo~

作者: fmchelloauntie 時間: 2005-5-29 11:53 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-28 08:09 AM:

咁利記依家連外圍賽資格都冇wo~

而家好似又有新進展了.....
唔明點解足協可以做得咁差...成日講過d野又唔算...球例改完又改...

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-5-29 12:17 PM

Originally posted by fmchelloauntie at 2005-5-29 11:53 AM:

而家好似又有新進展了.....
唔明點解足協可以做得咁差...成日講過d野又唔算...球例改完又改...

係咁嫁喇=_="

作者: victoro 時間: 2005-5-30 03:00 AM

To me, I feel its really make sense that Liverpool couldn't enter ECC next year.
We all feel that Liverpool should enter next year's ECC just becoz we always keep in mind that "champion should enter next year's game automatically", but actually this idea will hurt the quality of the game.

Even u get the champion, it doesn't really means that you must be the best team for the whole europe this year.
A better reflection and a better guarantee of the quality of the game is to pick the highest ranking teams in each league.

World Cup has already changed its system and Brazil can no longer enter World Cup 2006 automatically. If Brazil is still a strong team, it can enter no matter how. If it can't, there is no point for it to enter World Cup 2006 and it will only degrade the overall quality.

Imagine, if Everton wins ECC next year and Liverpool gets the fourth ranking, I guess many ppl will argue again that Liverpool should enter ECC instead of Everton. Obviously, such a judgement comes from the feeling of "traditional strong team" of Liverpool.

Its totally unfair to sacrifice Everton for Liverpool in this case.
I respect Liverpool and its effort in ECC, but I still believe a system should not be changed.

P.S. the reason why Real Madrid could enter ECC even its not qualified in its own league is that the Spanish Soccer Association (sthg like that...haha) makes its choice to let Real Madrid to enter ECC. So back to Liverpool, English Soccer Association has already claimed that Everton will be its choice to represent England to play in ECC next year. So why does it still so many arguments? Its kinda like Liverpool forcing everyone to give it a place for ECC next year.

作者: bigfish 時間: 2005-5-30 04:40 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 01:22 AM:
有冇搞錯呀,咁攞冠軍黎做咩,個個打生打死黎做咩???

打生打死梗係為錦標啦

作者: bigfish 時間: 2005-5-30 04:44 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-5-27 04:43 AM:

如果足協果邊真係死都唔比5隊參加既話,呢個方法係最好的><"

本身38週o既聯賽已經係歐聯外圍賽, 不過佢入唔到圍o者

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)