娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 車仔0既買人政策,長遠會否引起各球會或球迷"公憤"? [打印本頁]

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-8-21 10:19 AM 標題: 車仔0既買人政策,長遠會否引起各球會或球迷"公憤"?

呢個投要絕對唔係針對車路士球迷只不過係聽下大家意見

懶...should change to "賴"

[ Last edited by skjeiw on 2005-8-21 at 10:27 AM ]

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-21 10:36 AM

Originally posted by skjeiw at 2005-8-21 10:19:
呢個投要絕...

冇計嫁喎,鬼叫油王大得你起咩

作者: abcde1918 時間: 2005-8-21 11:00 AM

Originally posted by skjeiw at 2005-8-21 10:19 AM:
呢個投要絕...

開埋D咁的投票,唔想投....

作者: 奶仔 時間: 2005-8-21 11:02 AM

唔會,咁梗係有人富有人貧,無錢唔好懶

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-21 11:26 AM

唔會= ="

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-21 12:32 PM

大球會就憎,細會就歡迎

作者: hllee 時間: 2005-8-21 01:53 PM

真奇怪.

我看了足球近10年,
從來不知車路士在揮金如土上,
與皇馬,國米,a米,曼聯.巴塞,拜仁有什麼大分別.

所以,你的問題應該是:

大球會盡收天下兵器於己身,
會否引起球迷不滿.

如果指說車路士,有點50步笑100步.
皇馬,國米亂花錢的風格,買下的巨星,比車仔少嗎?
拜仁一統所有德甲新巨星的歷史更長.

別眼紅吧.
像我是修咸頓的球迷,我沒有不滿.根本細會另有生存之道及目標.

如果本身是皇馬,國米,a米,曼聯.巴塞,拜仁等等大會的球迷,更沒有資格批評車仔.
正如墨索里尼沒可能說希特勒是殺人狂一樣.

作者: tkk2p 時間: 2005-8-21 02:49 PM

車路士短短兩季將成隊波改頭換面,係其他豪門球會比不上既地方,但另一方面,佢有錢就係有錢,冇偈~

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-8-21 03:08 PM

球會開心都黎唔切啦,以前邊有咁易賺錢呀

作者: pakho 時間: 2005-8-21 03:13 PM

唔會~~~
越有錢既球隊越想擊敗佢

o個種喜悅好正

作者: ming8964 時間: 2005-8-21 03:16 PM 標題: 車仔沒有好下場!!!

一旦油王利用完車仔個殼做財富轉移, 或者被俄羅斯政府拉去坐監充公財產, 車仔就會玩完, 永不超生!!!

作者: niamhandsome 時間: 2005-8-21 03:20 PM

Originally posted by hllee at 2005-8-21 01:53 PM:
真奇怪.

我看了足球近10年,
從來...

total agree!!
he use money but not force!

作者: pc20001103b 時間: 2005-8-21 04:22 PM

Originally posted by hllee at 2005-8-21 13:53:
真奇怪.

我看了足球近10年,
從來...

不同~
兩年咁短既時間用咁多錢仲成功埋
對別人黎講係好大既沖擊
國米係用錢多,但佢冇成功
巴塞而家仍然會睇住個價買(應該話佢已經受夠後果)
皇馬一向如是,但錢唔係最多,負債有政府頂(算係少少現眼報)
的確,我都認同"佢有錢,你吹咩既"講法

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-8-21 04:24 PM

我就覺得車仔係好運,有油王俾錢...富豪球會無得鬧...自己以前都係咁,只不過依家有人更有錢...

作者: bigfish 時間: 2005-8-21 04:35 PM

車仔以前都係富豪球會, 不過冇艾生咁巴閉o者
以前佢引入o既蘇拿, 史坦力, 米茲洛都用左唔少錢

作者: chicken 時間: 2005-8-21 04:40 PM

He buy expensive players, the sellers and players get more money, what's the problem?
The only clubs that don't happy are:
1. those don't want to pay high amount to buy good players (they only want to pay low amount or free transfer).
2. those don't want to sell their good players (they want their players loyal to them but no salaries increase).

[ Last edited by chicken on 2005-8-21 at 04:41 PM ]

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-8-21 05:33 PM

今年都開始有d球員寧願唔要錢都同佢玩野啦~
係曼城等錢使先會賣!
里昂就唔鬼知佢啦

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-8-21 05:42 PM

Originally posted by hllee at 2005-8-21 01:53 PM:
真奇怪.

我看了足球近10年,
從來...

我個人覺得車仔同皇馬買人係唔同方針:
車仔買人,就算比人當水魚都好,佢買果d都有一定實力(偶有一兩個買錯唔好提啦~邊個都會錯啦),名氣就未必大,仲有就係多數都仲有進步空間.
皇馬就多數買現成貨,買番黎時大多係顛峰期,跟住當然滑落啦.
以賺錢,皇馬係幾醒的,但阿布又唔等錢使~所以買的都有不少係仲有進步的新星,所以,皇馬同車仔買勁人唔可以一齊講...

講難聽d,皇馬只係西甲保頓~專買d成左名的球員,但成得名嘅,都差唔多退休了...

作者: 亨九利 時間: 2005-8-21 05:42 PM

鬧乜? 呢個世界不嬲有錢大晒.......:cool:

作者: lintohu 時間: 2005-8-21 07:57 PM

冇可能有錢都唔俾佢買ga....

作者: LMQ 時間: 2005-8-21 08:29 PM

人地車仔有油王撐腰
一句你吹咩你都已經奈佢唔何
不過肯定既係假如有一日油王離開車仔
車仔肯定pa街加破產

作者: 安迪 時間: 2005-8-21 08:40 PM

我覺得唔好拎其他球會黎比啦...
因為冇得比的(ac,國米,曼聯,皇馬,拜仁等邊有得比)
兩年用超過兩億...
邊間球會可以好似佢咁實死,
不過冇計啦!
有錢大晒嘛,吹佢唔脹,
但如果可以打敗佢嗰種感覺一定好正!

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-21 09:22 PM

No future la...
is now la...

作者: hllee 時間: 2005-8-21 09:45 PM

Originally posted by 安迪 at 2005-8-21 08:40 PM:
我覺得唔好拎其他球會黎比啦...
因為...

點解唔比得？５０步笑１００步．大家的成功也是建基於金錢上．
冇錢，無成功．
但有錢，不一定成功．
錢只是必要條件，但非充份條件．

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-21 10:01 PM

唔會,咁梗係有人富有人貧,無錢唔好懶

大佬ar.....人地有錢你都唔比人用
咁咪無左人生其中一種樂趣law

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-8-21 10:20 PM

如果你覺得會引起公憤,咁有人$10000買條牛仔褲,$30000飲支紅酒咁又點呀?佢又唔係上市配股然後亂洗錢,如果曼聯就可能會,因為佢要向股東交代

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-21 10:22 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-8-21 10:20 PM:
如果你覺得會引起公憤,咁有人$10000買條牛仔褲,$30000飲支紅酒咁又點呀?佢又唔係上市配股然後亂洗錢,如果曼聯就可能會,因為佢要向股東交代

講得好

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-21 10:24 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-8-21 10:20 PM:
如果你覺得會引起公憤,咁有人$10000買條牛仔褲,$30000飲支紅酒咁又點呀?佢又唔係上市配股然後亂洗錢,如果曼聯就可能會,因為佢要向股東交代

你呢個比喻好正

作者: 細驚 時間: 2005-8-21 11:54 PM

全球咁多好球員
佢真係有錢買晒又唔拘喎^.^

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 02:31 AM

Originally posted by 細驚 at 2005-8-21 11:54 PM:
全球咁多好球員
佢真係有錢買晒又唔拘喎^.^

其實我覺得果d 人都係唔抵得人地咁有錢姐
如果曼聯有朝一日咁有錢..........佢地咪又係會咁樣買人
有錢就要用ga la
唔通等留死果日令埋落去咩

作者: crap 時間: 2005-8-22 06:41 AM

買人到唔得, 咁玩master league黎做乜

作者: xi512 時間: 2005-8-22 10:11 AM

no.
It wins not because it has expensive players.
It win just because the players played well and work hard.
They played better than anyone else as a team.

I am a fans of Arsenal, not chelsea

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 07:19 PM

Originally posted by xi512 at 2005-8-22 10:11 AM:
no.
It wins not because it has expensive players.
It win just because the players played well and work hard.
They played better than anyone else as a team.

I am a fans of Arsenal, not chelsea

係ar....就算比哂成隊車路士你又點,你唔適用....天才都變庸才

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 08:42 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 19:19:

係ar....就算比哂成隊車路士你又點,你唔適用....天才都變庸才

你講梗費sir ar???科倫,廸查巴,沙夏去到曼聯都變庸才 !!!

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 08:44 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 08:42 PM:

你講梗費sir ar???科倫,廸查巴,沙夏去到曼聯都變庸才 !!!

差唔多la..佢真係唔係好識用人law
我講最近
朗尼可以話買得最好

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 08:47 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 20:44:

差唔多la..佢真係唔係好識用人law
我講最近
朗尼可以話買得最好

賓佬&雲格用人之道好過費sir好多,費sir~~~~~~~~下台la.

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 08:49 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 08:47 PM:

賓佬&雲格用人之道好過費sir好多,費sir~~~~~~~~下台la.

唯才是用就最好.....沙夏成日冇得上好唔抵

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 08:52 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 20:49:

唯才是用就最好.....沙夏成日冇得上好唔抵

法國都冇佢份~~~

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 08:53 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 08:52 PM:

法國都冇佢份~~~

咪係...比施斯搶左

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 08:59 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 20:53:

咪係...比施斯搶左

咪係...施斯呢D浪射王同廢柴迪比亞路冇分別

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 08:59 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 08:59 PM:

咪係...施斯呢D浪射王同廢柴迪比亞路冇分別

費sir成日一手抄wo人地前途

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 09:04 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 20:59:

費sir成日一手抄wo人地前途

同納比埋沒米高利冇分別

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-8-22 09:06 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 08:42 PM:

你講梗費sir ar???科倫,廸查巴,沙夏去到曼聯都變庸才 !!!

科蘭去左維拉利爾之後...同亨利一樣入25球ar

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 09:09 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 09:04 PM:

同納比埋沒米高利冇分別

米高利真係好鬼屎慘.....

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 09:12 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 21:09:

米高利真係好鬼屎慘.....

係喎,廿歲已有新Zola之名,之後就因為一個迪比亞路.........

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 09:15 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 09:12 PM:

係喎,廿歲已有新Zola之名,之後就因為一個迪比亞路.........

唉.........納比仲要做左意大利教練
米高利多數冇行

作者: 左輪仔 時間: 2005-8-22 09:18 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 21:12:

係喎,廿歲已有新Zola之名,之後就因為一個迪比亞路.........

同托迪一樣,都係D只識賺錢既職業球員~.~

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 09:20 PM

Originally posted by 左輪仔 at 2005-8-22 09:18 PM:

同托迪一樣,都係D只識賺錢既職業球員~.~

托迪唔係ar 話

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 09:24 PM

Originally posted by 左輪仔 at 2005-8-22 21:18:

同托迪一樣,都係D只識賺錢既職業球員~.~

托迪、碧咸都話有兩下技術睇ㄚ,但迪比亞路呢?????????

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 09:24 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 09:24 PM:

托迪、碧咸都話有兩下技術睇ㄚ,但迪比亞路呢?????????

當年既罰球

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 09:27 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 21:24:

當年既罰球

當年我夠一扭四送入空門la,當年喎~~~已成歷史la

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-22 09:29 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 09:27 PM:

當年我夠一扭四送入空門la,當年喎~~~已成歷史la

係咁ga la
佢都唔接受現實

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-22 09:30 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-22 21:29:

係咁ga la
佢都唔接受現實

咪就系~~~

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-23 06:08 AM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-22 09:30 PM:

咪就系~~~

不過佢仲係咪祖記隊長??

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-23 08:31 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-23 06:08 AM:

不過佢仲係咪祖記隊長??

都應該仲係,但係卡比路會唔會用佢都成問題啦,
其實祖記入面我比較鍾意迪比亞路,第二個就當然係保方,雖然迪比亞路表現唔好,
但佢係隊中一d都唔茅,呢點我比較欣賞,
其實上季祖記對AC米蘭,果場係爭奪冠軍最重要既一場,全靠佢傳到個波比查斯古特先至入到波......

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-23 11:56 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-23 08:31:

都應該仲係,但係卡比路會唔會用佢都...

佢旨在賺$$$咋麻,茅乜鬼ㄚ,有波咪踼law,冇波咪行下企下law

作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-23 11:25 PM

車仔有錢大晒無問題
車仔有錢入d唔值gum貴架球員無問題
車仔有錢托起晒d球員轉會費都無問題
最大問題最黑人憎就係...
佢嗰頭托起晒d價,呢頭就話個轉會市場太瘋狂,依家好難買人
真係"O"晒咀
攪屎棍都唔理你,但攪完屎棍又要嚴d屎臭
呢d係乜野理論呀,
所以犯眾憎一定係有理由
這樣就解釋到皇馬,國米一樣都係大灑金錢牌,但就無敢黑人憎
而車仔就仇家多

作者: Dicksonheng 時間: 2005-8-23 11:33 PM

同樣2000萬鎊多,

點解車仔買胡禮菲臘斯鬼咁嘈,

曼聯由當時盛世既列斯買李奧, 令列斯立即成績大滑, 頓失預算, 終致莫財,後降班
同埋由成績不佳既愛華頓買朗尼, 變相造就賓特同卡斯利上位, 成績仲節節上升
都同樣係無人講既?

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-23 11:37 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-23 11:56 AM:

佢旨在賺$$$咋麻,茅乜鬼ㄚ,有波咪踼law,冇波咪行下企下law

好多球員都係嫁啦,賺錢有咩問題????

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-23 11:38 PM

Originally posted by Dicksonheng at 2005-8-23 11:33 PM:
同樣2000萬鎊多,

點解車仔買胡禮菲...

問題係值唔值既問題,但係我覺得值囉~

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-24 02:08 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-23 11:38 PM:

問題係值唔值既問題,但係我覺得值囉~

值唔值一個問題
佢搞到球譠變到亂曬...
真係幾剋人憎........
遲下連我怕李鐵都要10m= ="

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 02:35 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-8-24 02:08 AM:

值唔值一個問題
佢搞到球譠變到亂曬...
真係幾剋人憎........
遲下連我怕李鐵都要10m= ="

咁用10m買李鐵果個都傻傻地既,SWP佢有前途用多d錢買冇所謂,最緊要係買果個覺得值,你話佢用二千幾萬鎊買個廢人就話啫

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 03:47 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-23 11:38 PM:

問題係值唔值既問題,但係我覺得值囉~

唔好比人有考慮既餘地ar ma
咁都唔明

作者: sktm 時間: 2005-8-24 04:10 AM

油王有的是錢.................

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 04:11 AM

Originally posted by sktm at 2005-8-24 04:10 AM:
油王有的是錢.................

有錢之餘又識買管理層
咁先勁

作者: sktm 時間: 2005-8-24 04:14 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-24 04:11 AM:

有錢之餘又識買管理層
咁先勁

買到一個好領隊勝過買10個星級球員

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 04:17 AM

Originally posted by sktm at 2005-8-24 04:14 AM:

買到一個好領隊勝過買10個星級球員

YES
好領隊可以化腐朽為神奇

作者: sktm 時間: 2005-8-24 04:20 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-24 04:17 AM:

YES
好領隊可以化腐朽為神奇

垃圾領隊可以帶領隊波用燒鵝既價錢踢出蔗渣既味道

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 04:30 AM

Originally posted by sktm at 2005-8-24 04:20 AM:

垃圾領隊可以帶領隊波用燒鵝既價錢踢出蔗渣既味道

燈神講既???

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 06:09 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-24 03:47 AM:

唔好比人有考慮既餘地ar ma
咁都唔明

就算出一千五百萬鎊曼城都唔洗諗~

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 08:12 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-24 06:09 AM:

就算出一千五百萬鎊曼城都唔洗諗~

但係七千萬鎊AC都唔諗

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 08:46 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-24 08:12 AM:

但係七千萬鎊AC都唔諗

ac點同啊,佢大把錢,但係曼城唔係有錢球隊,加上都要睇返個球員想唔想去同埋個球隊要唔要個球員~

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 09:02 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-24 08:46 AM:

ac點同啊,佢大把錢,但係曼城唔係有錢球隊,加上都要睇返個球員想唔想去同埋個球隊要唔要個球員~

無謂左人發達.........佢地都多左高爾同華素爾

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 09:07 AM

係呀~

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 09:11 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-24 09:07 AM:
係呀~

我覺得曼城,熱刺同米堡都會係今季既黑馬

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-8-24 01:56 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-24 09:11 AM:

我覺得曼城,熱刺同米堡都會係今季既黑馬

曼城?真係好黑下喎~
熱刺,,都幾好啦

作者: buengland 時間: 2005-8-24 02:23 PM

我覺得轉會市場真係有啲反常.....同吾平衡

長遠嚟講真係可大可小, 一、兩支球隊玩晒, 嚴重嚟講會令球賽可觀性大大減底, 啲人會越來越減少對超聯的狂熱程度, 導至球賽入座率下降, 影響球會收入........

不過無計啦.....鬼叫有自由市場咩, 有人推到個價天咁高, 攪亂晒啲供求平衡

不過大家可以參考NBA, 佢地好似話每年有轉會費上限, 同以去季成績決定選新人的優先權(成績差可以選先).........

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-8-24 04:19 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-23 23:37:

好多球員都係嫁啦,賺錢有咩問題????

賺錢冇問題,阻人前途就好有問題

作者: jameshohk 時間: 2005-8-24 04:36 PM

轉會市場唔平衡, 攪亂晒啲供求平衡是事實

但有四個問題要想一想

1. 一場轉會, 有買方, 亦有賣方. 車仔問SWP價, 曼城開價21M, Mourinho話個轉會市場太瘋狂,依家好難買人, 就證明車仔都想個價低D, 如果車仔對推高個價有責任, 點解曼城無責任?
   答案是, 曼城想賺取多D錢, 自己利益著想, 好正常. 同車仔, 同其他球會一樣, 好正常.

   車路士有足夠錢, 想買SWP,    曼城    開價21M, 唔夠錢唔賣
   阿仙奴有足夠錢, 想買Hleb,    Stuttgart 開價10M, 唔夠錢唔賣
   西布朗有足夠錢, 想買Ellington,  Wigan 開價3M ,  唔夠錢唔賣, 好正常

   車仔有足夠錢, 球員又合用, 唔買?
   定係曼城開價18M, 車仔就唔買?

如果個價太離譜...

2. 誰決定球員身價? Wenger話SWP值10M, 就一定要10M成交? 就價錢, 相比Zidane, Figo尚未算高, 如果SWP成為球王, 呢個價簡直超值, 誰有資格決定球員身價?
   就算唔值21M, SWP個Case, 車仔同其他球會買錯人有何分別?

3. 影響有多大? 真是有影響? 定係只是一個籍口? Lyon話英國擊敗法國舉辦奧運, 所有Essien唔走得, 相信各位有見識, 都知是籍口, 就算車仔唔買人, 其他球會一樣有其他籍口(如政府加稅, 英國舉辦奧運).
   Lyon又話車仔出價37M買Gerrard, Essien都要37M, 結果26M成交.

4. 有邊間球會的球迷唔想班主比多d錢買出色的球員? 阿仙奴話車路士出價高, 英國小型球會話阿仙奴10M買Hleb是天價, 點計? 難道英國小型球會話阿仙奴太離譜,其他球會想買最好0既球員都好難? 定係一定要出同一個價方是對?

最後, 上邊只是我一些無知的見解, 亦無意針對任何球會, 如有意見, 歡迎指出.

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-8-24 07:13 PM

咁SWP個價就意料之外...佢上季表現真係好,而且同一個聯賽...賣貴d好應該

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-25 11:35 PM

supply demand 啫......細個econ都有教

有價值自然有人想要, 有人想要自然係價高者得
呢個係社會定律, 足球係社會一部份
有錢球會買到好球員理所當然, 睇開d啦

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-25 11:49 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-8-24 04:19 PM:

賺錢冇問題,阻人前途就好有問題

咁就只怪被人阻住前途果個球員喇,佢上唔到位自己都有責任~

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-8-26 02:08 AM

如果睇波超過15年以上都應該記得AC在90年代初點瘋狂買人,差不多每次都破世界紀錄,如果計埋通漲,佢地當年買人D價就真係'天價'喇,所車仔都唔係好過份啫,起碼現今足球賺錢能力都大過當年好多

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-26 05:19 AM

Originally posted by buengland at 2005-8-24 02:23 PM:
我覺得轉會市場真係有啲反常.....同吾...

你話對超聯熱情減少,係絕對無可能既事

作者: chicken 時間: 2005-8-26 01:10 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-26 05:19 AM:

你話對超聯熱情減少,係絕對無可能既事

Man U also dominates Premier League in the last 10 years, but it seems that there are more and more people watch Premier League.

作者: fourfourtwo4424 時間: 2005-8-31 10:23 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-25 11:35 PM:
supply demand 啫......細個econ都有教

有價值自然有人想要, 有人想要自然係價高者得
呢個係社會定律, 足球係社會一部份
有錢球會買到好球員理所當然, 睇開d啦

你都幾勁bor

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)