娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 大家心目中踢得最假架一場波 [打印本頁]

作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-23 08:16 PM 標題: 大家心目中踢得最假架一場波

我選98世盃決賽巴西vs法國
真係假到爆! 有幾多人收左錢我唔知
肥哨就一定有份:cool:
次選就係02世盃8強賽南韓vs西班牙
又係假到爆!

作者: 亨九利 時間: 2005-8-23 08:29 PM

我選98世盃決賽巴西vs法國
假波經典..........

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-23 08:30 PM

Originally posted by 亨九利 at 2005-8-23 08:29 PM:
我選98世盃決...

x2...
作者: 我‧愛‧你 時間: 2005-8-23 08:39 PM

..我選南韓在02年wc分組賽後所以賽事
作者: 瑞比 時間: 2005-8-23 08:42 PM

意甲好多,但諗唔到邊場...............
作者: F.K.U.R.S.O 時間: 2005-8-23 08:45 PM

None
作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-23 09:15 PM

今年一場芬超夏卡8:0阿里安斯
作者: 甘國武 時間: 2005-8-23 09:15 PM

咁係咪逢爆泠必假？
作者: michael86 時間: 2005-8-23 09:17 PM

其實未必係收左左錢架...
可能係捉左佢地d屋企人要脅佢地呢...
作者: 甘國武 時間: 2005-8-23 09:24 PM

唔係，我話法國前一晚請曬佢地去叫雞～
作者: gundamman678 時間: 2005-8-23 09:39 PM

舊年中國爭世界杯外圍賽出線，最後同香港隊打個場!
作者: skjeiw 時間: 2005-8-23 09:40 PM

Euro 04, France vs England
作者: 甘國武 時間: 2005-8-23 09:43 PM

Originally posted by gundamman678 at 2005-8-23 09:39 PM:
舊年中國爭世界杯外圍賽出線，最後同香港隊打個場!
對，都出唔到線至抵死～
作者: gundamman678 時間: 2005-8-23 09:49 PM

國內都有唔少，不過無機會睇之嘛~~
作者: sonyguy 時間: 2005-8-23 09:52 PM

Originally posted by michael86 at 2005-8-23 09:17 PM:
其實未必係收左左錢架...
可能係捉左佢地d屋企人要脅佢地呢...
同意...

其實我覺得在呢d 頂級既世界賽中...
我唔相信有人踼假波...
特別係為錢而踼假波...

你話大哨收左錢...
如果你係大哨...你要收幾多先肯踼到咁醜怪...
佢地每個星期收入萬幾二百萬港元架喎...
...
另外...如果你真係想踼假波...
都唔駛假成咁...
其實只要射波果腳射高d...
交波交衰d...

所以如果真係有假波...
我覺得係關乎佢地既生命安危!!
作者: sohozhk 時間: 2005-8-23 10:01 PM

中國國家隊對香港隊，爭世界杯外圍賽出線，2004年11月17日。賽果7:0，令中國球迷滿意。

中國隊雖然在亞洲區世界盃外圍賽第4組分組賽，以7﹕0「狂數」香港隊，但由於同日同組另一場比賽，科威特以6﹕1擊敗馬來西亞，兩隊雖然得失球差相同，但中國隊最後因得球不及對手，緣盡2006年德國決賽周。然而，在這令人迷惑的一夜，中國及科威特出人意表以大比數勝出，惹起各界懷疑是否存在「假波」成分。

香港隊上陣得一個球員，係得龍門范俊業一個，同場上廿一個對方的球員力戰到底。寫下香港足球史上最光輝的一頁。
作者: kenneth_so03 時間: 2005-8-23 10:01 PM

法國對巴西果場有幾假=.=..我果時未開始睇波...搵人講解下
作者: mitsuilam 時間: 2005-8-23 10:11 PM

2004年歐國杯分組賽
丹麥vs瑞典
2-2
令意大利出唔到線
作者: gundamman678 時間: 2005-8-23 10:11 PM

香港隊上陣得一個球員，係得龍門范俊業一個，同場上廿一個對方的球員力戰到底。寫下香港足球史上最光輝的一頁。

哈! 呢句好野!!

應該推舉佢為世界第一鋼門!
作者: 奶茶 時間: 2005-8-23 10:30 PM

00年利物浦(英超)對阿拉維斯(西甲)仲假呀,4比4
作者: kenneth_so03 時間: 2005-8-23 10:31 PM

前排英格籣對丹麥...加力查
作者: bhjs_2d_31 時間: 2005-8-23 10:32 PM

丹麥2-2瑞典
作者: 事但 時間: 2005-8-23 11:06 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-23 08:16 PM:
大家心目中踢得最假架一場波

令你輸錢個場.:cool:
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-23 11:18 PM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-8-23 09:52 PM:

同意...

其實我覺得在呢d 頂級...
同意
作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-23 11:21 PM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-8-23 09:52 PM:

同意...

其實我覺得在呢d 頂級...
歐聯AC3-3利記果場真係唔係假波law
大佬......歐聯對一個球員黎講幾咁重要你知唔知.....
難道舒夫真高離門2碼射門被巴夫斯救出係假ga 咩
作者: 甘國武 時間: 2005-8-23 11:27 PM

Originally posted by gundamman678 at 2005-8-23 10:11 PM:
香港隊上陣得一個球員，係得龍門范俊業一個，同場上廿一個對方的球員力戰到底。寫下香港足球史上最光輝的一頁。
正！平均3人圍攻先輸一球～
作者: harvey22 時間: 2005-8-24 12:01 AM

i juz watch news, this Braunschweig VS Borussia Dortmund 2-1 looks a bit fake to me... J. Koller  scores at 28mins, then the whole stadium lights went out, Braunschweig  scores on 42, and 84 mins. Also Dortmund denfenders looks werid .. .not sure about this but juz wondering if anyone else saw that
作者: harvey22 時間: 2005-8-24 12:03 AM

Talking about match that got cut off b4, i remember last season Real Madrid vs Real Sociedad, the match cut off at 90 mins i think, then they rematch the added time 2 weeks later or something, madrid scores in that 1 min.
作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-24 12:24 AM

Originally posted by 事但 at 2005-8-23 23:06:

令你輸錢個場.:cool:
輸錢唔好賴地硬
細細玩吓咪算law
你都可以估嗰場係假波
然後買對家
作者: 事但 時間: 2005-8-24 12:49 AM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-24 12:24 AM:

輸錢唔好賴地硬
細細玩吓咪算law
你都可以估嗰場係假波
然後買對家
你誤會啦.
我睇左波十幾年,不過一次都未買過波.
只不過覺得自從香港有左賭波之後,
就多左一d"假波論".
只要戰果有d出人意表,就會被認為係假波.
不過,如果場場波都係強者必勝,
足球仲有乜好睇?
作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-8-24 12:52 AM

98年世界盃。巴西vs法國
半場出黎巴西走晒樣。
作者: 甘國武 時間: 2005-8-24 12:56 AM

Originally posted by 事但 at 2005-8-24 12:49 AM:

你誤會啦.
我睇左波十幾年,不過一...
對！...香港人係咁...
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 12:58 AM

入得多波一定假波????

咩定理
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 12:59 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 12:58 AM:
入得多波一定假波????

咩定理
咪係~
作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-8-24 01:02 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 00:58:
入得多波一定假波????

咩定理
不是定理。哈
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 01:03 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-8-24 01:02 AM:

不是定理。哈
:cool:
作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 01:12 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 12:58 AM:
入得多波一定假波????

咩定理
如果咁講,仲邊有進攻足球呢回事
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 01:13 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-24 01:12 AM:

如果咁講,仲邊有進攻足球呢回事
咁以後3:3,4:4,4:3依d比數
唔洗睇lu............

一定係假波
作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 01:15 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 01:13 AM:

咁以後3:3,4:4,4:3依d比數
唔洗睇lu............

一定係假波
多蒙特青年軍同不萊梅青年軍
係上季末打過一場5:5
唉.......估唔到我鍾意既球隊打假波

作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 01:18 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-24 01:15 AM:

多蒙特青年軍同不萊梅青年軍
係上季末打過一場5:5
唉.......估唔到我鍾意既球隊打假波

歐聯3:3都假波lu

我好心痛law,愛隊又打假波/.\
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 01:20 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 01:18 AM:

歐聯3:3都假波lu

我好心痛law,愛隊又打假波/.\
皇馬3:1巴塞又係假波>3<"
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 01:22 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-24 01:20 AM:

皇馬3:1巴塞又係假波>3<"
3:1???4:2????
作者: 瑞比 時間: 2005-8-24 01:26 AM

曼聯大炒森林係假波.........../.\

玩埋一份XDD
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 01:28 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 01:22 AM:

3:1???4:2????
唔記得= ="好似係4比2,haha~
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 01:35 AM

我好唔同意雷公依個topic

你係尊重足球,熱愛足球就唔好話有假波出現......

人地打得唔好,或者大比數出現,就話假波???咩意思???

身為足球fans,睇場波最重要,你買波唔中又話假波,咁你唔好買唔好睇啦

所以好憎d人咁樣話足球.....

anyway,你有你意見,我只不過比意見你姐
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 01:52 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 01:35 AM:
我好唔同意雷公依個topic

...
同意,我都好憎d人咁講,買唔中波只怪自己眼光差,眼光差就唔好買啦,浪費金錢
作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-24 01:53 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 01:35 AM:
我好唔同意雷公依個topic

...
都係既,
但係假波存在又係事實
尤其芬超.
一個禮拜一場甘滯...
其實...尊重足球,熱愛足球,
同假波確實同出一撤,
因為一個人熱愛足球一定唔會打假波 !!
但正如世上有好人有壞人一樣
一定有人為錢為利而打假波,
所以,
真正有問題既唔係個topic,
而係打假波既人
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 01:54 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-8-24 01:53 AM:

都係既,
但係假波存在又係事實
尤...
問題係假波一定有,但係大比數就等於假波????呢點先至係雷公所講既問題
作者: haukwankin 時間: 2005-8-24 02:00 AM

中國隊雖然在亞洲區世界盃外圍賽第4組分組賽，以7﹕0「狂數」香港隊，但由於同日同組另一場比賽，科威特以6﹕1擊敗馬來西亞...

i think both sides are 踢假波...becoz i dont believe china can win HK with 7 goals when they need 7 goals to qualify(every1 know the relationship between HK and china right)

also...from my knowledge,馬來西亞 is better than 科威特 very much...its just like HK can win china 6-1...

just my comment,dont argue with me pls
作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-24 02:03 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-24 01:54 AM:

問題係假波一定有,但係大比數就等於假波????呢點先至係雷公所講既問題
其實好難睇一定波係咪假波,
但大比數唔一定等於假波...
好似上季曼聯4:1布拉格甘,甘熱門,
你話假都冇人信...
再睇我之前post個個
歷來十大最強弱懸殊賽事
我夠膽講冇一場假波

連最強弱懸殊最大比數d賽事都冇一場係假波
又好難話大比數一定等於假波既
作者: 事但 時間: 2005-8-24 02:13 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-24 01:54 AM:

問題係假波一定有,但係大比數就等於假波????呢點先至係雷公所講既問題
公平d講,
雷公邊度有講到大比數就係假波?
我真係睇唔到喎.
作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-24 02:19 AM

Originally posted by 事但 at 2005-8-24 02:13 AM:

公平d講,
雷公邊度有講到大比數就係假波?
我真係睇唔到喎.
唔係雷公,而係好多人都指出一d大比數既話係假波掛
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 02:24 AM

Originally posted by 事但 at 2005-8-24 02:13 AM:

公平d講,
雷公邊度有講到大比數就係假波?
我真係睇唔到喎.
係啵,記錯左添,sorry
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 02:36 AM

anyway

就算有假波出現,你都唔好用依個角度去睇
作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-24 02:55 AM

我幾時有話比數大就係假波黎?
無端端又比人屈...
仲有,我個topic出左咩問題?
點解會比人話有問題?
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 03:01 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 02:36 AM:
anyway

就算有假波出現,你都唔好用依個角度去睇
我就覺得高水平既賽事基本上唔會有假波出現~
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 03:02 AM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-24 02:55 AM:
我幾時有話比數大就係假波黎?
無端端又比人屈...
仲有,我個topic出左咩問題?
點解會比人話有問題?
咪講左sorry囉,睇唔到丫???
你出親既文章都比人話有問題.....咁你係唔係要諗下點解呢
作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-24 03:12 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 01:35:
我好唔同意雷公依個topic

...
night兄,
你所講 { 我好唔同意雷公依個topic
你係尊重足球,熱愛足球就唔好話有假波出現......
人地打得唔好,或者大比數出現,就話假波???咩意思???
身為足球fans,睇場波最重要,你買波唔中又話假波,咁你唔好買唔好睇啦
所以好憎d人咁樣話足球.....}

第一:假波一定有,熱那亞都因為踢假波所以比人罰降兩級落丙組踢
第二:我係尊重足球,熱愛足球,所以覺得個波真係有d唔妥,
   就更加要出d聲, 唔出聲唔代表就係尊重
第三:我無話大比數就係假波,唔好屈我,
   我話係假波嗰兩場世盃賽真係好有問題,
   唔只我一個係敢講,係好不沉常敢踢到失準,南韓嗰場就球證好有問題
第四:我無乜賭波,我唔係因為輸錢而話嗰兩場係假波,嗰兩場我都無買過
第五:唔知係咪我敏感,你好似係針對我,唔係針對我個topic喎,
   可能係我敏感ja
作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-24 03:21 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-24 03:02:

咪講左sorry囉,睇唔到丫???
你出親既文章都比人話有問題.....咁你係唔係要諗下點解呢
你似乎?
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 03:25 AM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-24 03:12 AM:

night兄,
你所講 [color=R...
我話唔同意你個topic,not u

第一:我完全無否定過有假波出現
第二:討論下係無問題,我都話我只係比下意見姐,如果你認為係尊重既話,ok~~無問題
第三:我幾時話你話大比數=假波??只係用d人黎講姐,我只作出反映
第四:亦都回應賭波既人姐
第五:我只係討論你既話題姐,not計對你

令你有乜誤會既話,講聲sorry,我只係作討論姐

maybe你既topic比較敏感d
作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-24 03:43 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 03:25:

我話唔同意你個topic,no...
一場誤會ja
作者: night 時間: 2005-8-24 03:46 AM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-24 03:43 AM:

一場誤會ja
大家都係討論討論姐
作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 03:52 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 03:46 AM:

大家都係討論討論姐
假波連足總都呃到
何況你地
作者: kitkit12345 時間: 2005-8-24 04:21 AM

好多波都是假................
他們都為了$
作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 04:29 AM

Originally posted by kitkit12345 at 2005-8-24 04:21 AM:
好多波都是假................
他們都為了$
所以意大利一d 無咩錢既球會會有
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 06:03 AM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-24 03:21 AM:

你似乎?
似乎咩???
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-24 06:11 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 03:46 AM:

大家都係討論討論姐
喔,誤會左雷公你真係唔好意思
作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-8-24 06:17 AM

Originally posted by mitsuilam at 2005-8-24 00:11:
2004年歐國杯分組賽
丹麥vs瑞典
2-2
令意大利出唔到線
it's impossible
if you watched what's happened in live.....

Or, if you are Italian fans...
then I should "shut up"

Cos I was watching both matches on live together......

If you are blaming that when Denmark draw with Sweden
Why Italy, they used all of their hearts and energy
couldn't score 2 goals until injury time?

What's the score about between Denmark vs Bulguria, and Sweden vs Bulguria before?
作者: sonyguy 時間: 2005-8-24 08:11 AM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-8-24 06:17 AM:

it's impossible
if you watched w...
同意...如果有睇丹麥對瑞典場波...
就會知究竟係唔係假..
首先...當丹麥贏2:1之後...
仍然有好多攻勢...
有兩三個致命射門...
但比瑞典龍門救到...
最重要係瑞典係在補時先射得入2:2...
如果佢地兩隊一早講定要2:2...
你係瑞典隊你肯唔肯丫...
到補時先追平呀??
果球射失點算??

所以証明話呢場波係假既人...
基本上係無睇呢場波...
如果睇左都話假...
我都唔知講乜好...
作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-8-24 08:16 AM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-8-24 06:17 AM:

it's impossible
if you watched w...
條友無野講令野黎講
呢個世界除左假波之外仲有好彩既
作者: iMacc 時間: 2005-8-24 10:12 AM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-8-24 08:11 AM:

同意...如果有睇丹麥對瑞典場波.....
我有睇....意大利嗰場波我都有同時間睇....
我都唔覺丹麥嗰場係假波....雖然開咗個好似內定嘅賽果....
睇見卡斯辛奴個樣真係心都噏呀....
我同意係有假波存在....大家可以從報章上睇到有幾多個國家有黑哨嘅出現~
就連四大聯賽都有兩個國家涉嫌有黑哨~
有d重証實埋添....
我都好同意之前有位會員所講...
球員踢假波係有可能被迫嘅...
大家睇吓d巴西球員喺本土聯賽踢出名堂之後d屋企人週不時被人綁架就畧知一二~
作者: 小狗狗 時間: 2005-8-24 10:37 AM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-8-23 08:30 PM:

x2...
X3
作者: SEEK 時間: 2005-8-24 01:45 PM

我睇開意大利波.....就覺得上季最後幾周和波都幾假........就連和波倍率都好古怪.........好似一早知道賽果咁!
作者: gogo8281 時間: 2005-8-24 04:34 PM

有個問題﹐如果有一支球隊參加左一項
正式賽事,事後卻後悔﹐但為左面子又
唔可以早早出局﹐所以留到決賽放軟手
腳故意輸波﹐算唔算假﹖
(講緊拉科及華倫西亞)
作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-8-24 04:49 PM

Originally posted by gogo8281 at 2005-8-24 18:34:
有個問題﹐如果有一支球隊參加左一項
...
or you can talk about Parma in UEFA cup semi-final last year.......
作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-24 04:57 PM

Originally posted by gogo8281 at 2005-8-24 04:34 PM:
有個問題﹐如果有一支球隊參加左一項
...
又唔係假波甘嚴重lo..可以話係冇盡力
但都唔o岩la...球迷梗係想睇好波ga la...
冇盡力咪唔好睇lo...
好似帕爾馬上季甘....出d青年軍打協,
聯賽又爭d降班
帕爾馬d Fans咪唔happy lo...
作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-8-24 05:04 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-8-24 18:57:

又唔係假波甘嚴重lo..可以話係冇盡...
Well, I would say they may not put 100% effort on some matches ....

I give you 2 more examples:

in 2002-03 season

Arsenal 6-1 Southampton

both of them were in FA Cup final

Arsenal lost the champion to Man Utd. Southampton can be playing in UEFA next season...
They were more relaxing to play that game... so the score was that high

in 2004-2005 season

Arsenal 7-0 Everton
Well, Arsenal was 2nd and Everton could be 3rd or 4th
it won't effect they can play in European Championship this season.....
作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-24 05:25 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-8-24 05:04 PM:

Well, I would say they may not ...
當然一定有例外啦
不過兩面都冇野爭而唔盡力玩玩下先有呢種例外,場波有機會好多入波,更加有d悅目技術睇tim...
但有種情况一定冇例外,就係一面唔盡力,一面博命,場波會一面倒兼且好悶(因寫佔上風o個隊入完兩球等收工開始差波,唔盡力o個隊又唔迫),
上面parma就係甘....
見住自己愛隊比人噤住來打,
唔好受...

[ Last edited by adamjacky123 on 2005-8-24 at 05:27 PM ]
作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-8-24 05:38 PM

踢爆拉脫維亞收俄軍錢打假波
「清高」隊長壞兩國好事
24/08/2005

拉脫維亞國家隊隊長艾斯達捷夫斯尋日爆大鑊，話月中對俄羅斯世界杯外圍賽，賽前俄羅斯有代表向拉脫維亞足總及各拉脫維亞球員派錢，要求佢輸波，艾斯達捷夫斯仲話賄款數目好吸引添，不過呢位老牌隊長就「唔生性」，替球隊先開紀錄，最後雙方一比一言和，唔通佢冇份收錢？至於雙方足總當然例牌否認，件事肯定有排查，不過俄羅斯球隊艾斯達捷夫斯得罪晒兩邊足總，睇來都要搵定會轉啦！
作者: 奶茶 時間: 2005-8-24 09:46 PM

Originally posted by night at 2005-8-24 01:13 AM:

咁以後3:3,4:4,4:3依d比數
唔洗睇lu............

一定係假波
你有無睇過利物浦對阿拉維斯果場波先？？
果場我睇住阿拉維斯個摩蘭奴射罰球（軟弱無力既地波）呀，利物浦擺４個人場全部跳起晒，４條友望住個波ｏ係腳底碌過，最抵死係杜迪克連波皮都揩唔到呀，咁就４比４，跟住利物浦加時先ｋｏ對手咋！！！
作者: 金魚佬 時間: 2005-8-25 12:09 AM

香港對中國啦，〔同場馬來對南韓反而吾算，馬來一早想輸，派後備來踼〕。
我身為香港人，特別記得，又特別覺得醜。
作者: 事但 時間: 2005-8-25 01:29 AM

Originally posted by gogo8281 at 2005-8-24 04:34 PM:
有個問題﹐如果有一支球隊參加左一項
正式賽事,事後卻後悔﹐但為左面子又
唔可以早早出局﹐所以留到決賽放軟手
腳故意輸波﹐算唔算假﹖
(講緊拉科及華倫西亞)

唔使如果,亦唔使到決賽.
每年聯賽杯亞仙奴,曼聯都係派副選,
擺到明唔係盡全力,
唔通又係叫假波?
一d比賽,某球隊已注定出線/出局,
亦通常唔會full team,
唔通又係叫假波?

會唔會濫左d呢?
作者: iMacc 時間: 2005-8-25 09:29 AM

Originally posted by 事但 at 2005-8-25 01:29 AM:

唔使如果,亦唔使到決賽.
每年聯賽...
同意~
一年咁多場波....場場都打嗰15,6個人就未到季尾班球員已經謝哂~
尤其上年嘅帕爾馬....
講真你話打d盃仔緊要定聯賽緊要嘞~
其實都唔怪得佢哋嘅~
顧得一邊又顧唔到另一邊....

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0