娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 皇馬...慘敗.... [打印本頁]

作者: 7jai7jai 時間: 2005-9-11 07:08 AM 標題: 皇馬...慘敗....

大家點睇皇馬今屆.....

招兵買馬後,某d位置仲係冇適合人選,

例如左翼...強勁防中!

頭先對切爾達就算冇冤枉波

俾盡皇馬只可和波

前鋒強但冇左keyman C丹分波真係差好遠.....

poor real mad!!!

[ Last edited by 7jai7jai on 2005-9-11 at 07:10 AM ]

圖片附件: R.Madrid%20geriatrico[1].jpg (2005-9-11 07:08 AM, 41.1 KB) / 下載次數 72
http://26fun.com./bbs/attachment.php?aid=555417&k=700d647a20fd174189ab657e1b2f24ce&t=1732372054&sid=QcN50a

作者: pakho 時間: 2005-9-11 10:12 AM

呢層我真係未擔心皇馬喎~~~睇佢上下半場真係判若兩隊~~~成隊波上半場踢到識飛咁,
(最博,最有用都係羅賓仔,見佢勁落力,自己去又得,傳又得~)相信過多幾年又會有個新球王誕生......已現在人腳計,今年世界盃應該都係巴西
反而最擔心都係我愛隊..輸到.......唉.......

[ Last edited by pakho on 2005-9-11 at 10:14 AM ]

作者: a13670 時間: 2005-9-11 10:47 AM

唔係咁打,d外圍又點贏錢呀

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 10:49 AM

Originally posted by a13670 at 2005-9-11 10:47 AM:
唔係咁打,d外圍又點贏錢呀

球證一定收左$$$

同埋,皇馬敗在佢係皇馬!

作者: pakho 時間: 2005-9-11 10:56 AM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 10:49 AM:

球證一定收左$$$

同埋,皇馬敗在佢係皇馬!

係囉~~~問題球又再出現~睇黎都係要靠先進儀器幫手至得~球證博炒魷

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 10:59 AM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-9-11 10:56 AM:

係囉~~~問題球又再出現~睇黎都係要靠先進儀器幫手至得~球證博炒魷

我冇睇到呀,但上網睇話果球根本未入白界,

就算唔質疑球證收左錢,都覺得球證好難睇清每一刻

作者: wer 時間: 2005-9-11 10:59 AM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 10:49:

球證一定收左$$$

同埋,皇馬敗在佢係皇馬!

判錯就話收錢唉!

作者: chicken 時間: 2005-9-11 11:32 AM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-9-11 10:59 AM:

判錯就話收錢唉!

Yes this sentence will appear again many times because RM is still the last season's RM.

作者: funnygay 時間: 2005-9-11 12:05 PM

講番句公道說話,球證都係人,
係個一刻,咁千鈞一髮之際好難睇得咁清既

作者: pakho 時間: 2005-9-11 12:14 PM

Originally posted by funnygay at 2005-9-11 12:05 PM:
講番句公道說話,球證都係人,
係個一刻,咁千鈞一髮之際好難睇得咁清既

佢好SURE~即判入球喎~~~應該問下旁証再下判

作者: fffffa 時間: 2005-9-11 01:04 PM

就算係睇錯,後防咁俾人從容起到腳,仲要係空晒,低輸~~!

作者: edward1906 時間: 2005-9-11 01:32 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-9-11 12:14 PM:

佢好SURE~即判入球喎~~~應該問下旁証再下判

球証開頭判唔入架,係旁証話入先判番入
旁証個樣仲好肯定入左.........實收左$啦

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-9-11 02:35 PM

Why people always think referees are corrupted?

Did u goto be the referee in reality?

Do u think they could have that angles as you could see it on TV?

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:17 PM

如果皇馬真係輸比對方,而唔係輸比呢d咁既冤枉波我心服口服啦,始終下半場打得唔好,但係輸埋呢d波就真係唔順氣喇~

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:19 PM

不過,有個仲值得諗~
卡c拿c好似食左瀉藥咁都係一點,會唔會皇馬傾新約唔掂,所以冇咩心機?

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:20 PM

係囉,我見佢同以前唔同晒= ="

作者: 艾奧羅斯 時間: 2005-9-11 04:22 PM

唔好話咩收左錢...
總之皇馬既後防差係事實!
咁打法去到里昂都唔知點死!!

作者: wer 時間: 2005-9-11 04:23 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 16:20:
係囉,我見佢同以前唔同晒= ="

打完國際賽後遺症?

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:24 PM

Originally posted by 艾奧羅斯 at 2005-9-11 04:22 PM:
唔好話咩收左錢...
總之皇馬既後防差係事實!
咁打法去到里昂都唔知點死!!

係咁ga la
唔係咩叫有運ar

國米都輸3:2 la

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:25 PM

Originally posted by 艾奧羅斯 at 2005-9-11 04:22 PM:
唔好話咩收左錢...
總之皇馬既後防差係事實!
咁打法去到里昂都唔知點死!!

冇錯,當球証睇錯囉,我就覺得邊有咁多收錢呢d野丫.........
皇馬明顯卡斯拿斯今年好似唔係好掂咁......我諗下場都應該會出拉莫斯打正選.....不過唔明既係點解下半場出拉莫斯都可以輸波........比好多空位人地組織= ="

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:25 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-9-11 04:23 PM:

打完國際賽後遺症?

唔知,之前見佢係亞洲果d熱身賽都係咁= ="

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:26 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:25 PM:

冇錯,當球証睇錯囉,我就覺得邊有咁...

下次打好d la

今場都唔係真係咁好

輸一次唔會死ge.....加油好了

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:28 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:26 PM:

下次打好d la

今場都唔係真係咁好

輸一次唔會死ge.....加油好了

輸一次梗係唔會死啦,最慘係巴塞今晚對馬略卡..........如果佢贏波既多皇馬一分,一開始就領先皇馬......一定好難追,等於英超車仔咁......所以皇馬要攞冠軍就要做到盡量唔輸

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:35 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:25 PM:

冇錯,當球証睇錯囉,我就覺得邊有咁...

我話收左手$$,純粹不滿球證
引起大家不滿的話,在此致歉

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:36 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:35 PM:

我話收左手$$,純粹不滿球證
引起大家不滿的話,在此致歉

我都不滿球証,但係我唔會話球証收左錢,因為球証都係人黎既,睇唔到入唔入咪當佢盲既囉~

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:37 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:36 PM:

我都不滿球証,但係我唔會話球証收左錢,因為球証都係人黎既,睇唔到入唔入咪當佢盲既囉~

習慣性的思考

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:38 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:36 PM:

我都不滿球証,但係我唔會話球証收左錢,因為球証都係人黎既,睇唔到入唔入咪當佢盲既囉~

同埋個球證成日走錯位
仲有,佢好似咩都睇唔到要問旁證

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:39 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:37 PM:

習慣性的思考

我相信球証盲多過佢收左錢,哈哈

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:40 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:38 PM:

同埋個球證成日走錯位
仲有,佢好似咩都睇唔到要問旁證

的確係呀佢,皇馬果球12碼都係旁證話比球証聽既= =".....
仲有呀,羅賓奴有球波雖然大哨越左位,但係佢冇掂到個波既,羅賓奴射入左竟然話唔入

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:41 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:40 PM:

的確係呀佢,皇馬果球12碼都係旁證話比球証聽既= =".....
仲有呀,羅賓奴有球波雖然大哨越左位,但係佢冇掂到個波既,羅賓奴射入左竟然話唔入

好似烏茲別克果場咁樣,重賽

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:42 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:40 PM:

的確係呀佢,皇馬果球12碼都係旁證話比球証聽既= =".....
仲有呀,羅賓奴有球波雖然大哨越左位,但係佢冇掂到個波既,羅賓奴射入左竟然話唔入

呢d就係e冇殘疾歧視的壞處!
比個豆雞嘅做球證...

作者: wer 時間: 2005-9-11 04:42 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 16:40:

的確係呀佢,皇馬果球12碼都係旁證話比球証聽既= =".....
仲有呀,羅賓奴有球波雖然大哨越左位,但係佢冇掂到個波既,羅賓奴射入左竟然話唔入

佢可以判越位

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:43 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-9-11 04:42 PM:

佢可以判越位

新例唔係話要掂到個波先判越位既咩

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:43 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:42 PM:

呢d就係e冇殘疾歧視的壞處!
比個豆雞嘅做球證...

豆雞????????????

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:44 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:41 PM:

好似烏茲別克果場咁樣,重賽

我都想,比返一分皇馬已經好開心

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:44 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:43 PM:

豆雞????????????

鬥雞眼= ="

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:45 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:44 PM:

鬥雞眼= ="

有咩???

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:46 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:44 PM:

我都想,比返一分皇馬已經好開心

好似皇蘇果場咁樣重賽我都估唔到咁都會令番三分

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:46 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:45 PM:

有咩???

佢話球証有= ="

作者: wer 時間: 2005-9-11 04:46 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 16:43:

新例唔係話要掂到個波先判越位既咩

但佢可以用番舊例

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:46 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-9-11 04:46 PM:

但佢可以用番舊例

但西甲都用新例la

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:46 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:45 PM:

有咩???

有朋友唔like我話球證收左$$嘛~
咪話佢豆雞~睇唔清亂判囉

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:47 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:46 PM:

但西甲都用新例la

新舊因球證而決定???

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:47 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:46 PM:

有朋友唔like我話球證收左$$嘛~
咪話佢豆雞~睇唔清亂判囉

哦....oic......
我覺得佢隻腳有問題多d
成日走錯位

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:47 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-9-11 04:46 PM:

但佢可以用番舊例

新例出左用乜鬼野舊例呀,個球証又係多餘既

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:48 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:47 PM:

哦....oic......
我覺得佢隻腳有問題多d
成日走錯位

天呀~比個天殘地缺嘅朋友做球證

作者: wer 時間: 2005-9-11 04:49 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 16:47:

新舊因球證而決定???

應該說球證的執法角度一唔一樣

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 04:49 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:48 PM:

天呀~比個天殘地缺嘅朋友做球證

我做仲好....

你地想幾比幾就話我知

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:49 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:46 PM:

有朋友唔like我話球證收左$$嘛~
咪話佢豆雞~睇唔清亂判囉

比d收左錢既證據黎呀唔該

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:49 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:49 PM:

我做仲好....
你地想幾比幾就話我知

少少地,1比0啦

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:50 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:49 PM:

比d收左錢既證據黎呀唔該

收據?唔出架喎

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:51 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:50 PM:

收據?唔出架喎

哇

.......我要比d證據老婆睇嫁

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:51 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-9-11 04:49 PM:

應該說球證的執法角度一唔一樣

咁好難攪啫~
容乜易場場唔同架?

作者: wer 時間: 2005-9-11 04:52 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 16:49:

我做仲好....
你地想幾比幾就話我知

唔收錢你會好忙

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:53 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:51 PM:

咁好難攪啫~
容乜易場場唔同架?

根本上新例出左舊例都唔會再用嫁啦~

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:53 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:51 PM:

哇.......我要比d證據老婆睇嫁

球證當然唔攞收據啦~
搏比老婆充公咩~

作者: wer 時間: 2005-9-11 04:53 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 16:51:

咁好難攪啫~
容乜易場場唔同架?

是架.可能下次又唔同

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:54 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:53 PM:

球證當然唔攞收據啦~
搏比老婆充公咩~

我要話比老婆聽我好叻叻丫,走去收人錢,哈哈

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:57 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:54 PM:

我要話比老婆聽我好叻叻丫,走去收人錢,哈哈

跟住老婆要你上繳比佢買手袋呀

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 04:58 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:57 PM:

跟住老婆要你上繳比佢買手袋呀

唔打緊唔打緊,比得起

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 04:58 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 04:49 PM:

我做仲好....
你地想幾比幾就話我知

$1000一球~
入唔到都判12碼

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 05:03 PM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2005-9-11 04:58 PM:

$1000一球~
入唔到都判12碼

$2000一張黃牌
$3000一張紅牌
贏左就$8000

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-9-11 05:05 PM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 05:03 PM:

$2000一張黃牌
$3000一張紅牌
贏左就$8000

比錢買黃牌

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-9-11 05:35 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 16:47:

新例出左用乜鬼野舊例呀,個球証又係多餘既

果球問題係朗拿度真係太近個波,而且佢又積極去攞波,臨起腳先讓比羅賓奴,再加上佢絕對影響到對方後衛同賽事進行,所以球證都應該要吹,怪球證不如怪自己後防,第二球柏和完全係白痴嘅典範,第三球個後衛又判決錯誤頂空氣,反而卡斯拿斯我覺得ok,十二碼都救到,3球波都唔係好關佢事

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 05:46 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-9-11 05:35 PM:

果球問題係朗拿度真係太近個波,而且...

對,你又講得岩,卡斯拿斯係打得ok既,只不過係冇平時咁勁啫,再加上班後防真係........= ="

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-9-11 05:54 PM

睇完昨晚場波,又諗返烏滋別克對巴林,有一個問題諗到,如果紐尼斯佢係射十二碼起腳前已經走入禁區,跟住由佢執雞,咁球證應該當入定重射十二碼呢,但兩種情況都係犯規那對有着數,真係唔知點判

作者: kyleung 時間: 2005-9-11 05:59 PM

俾個罰球皇馬囉.........

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-9-11 06:09 PM

Originally posted by kyleung at 2005-9-11 17:59:
俾個罰球皇馬囉.........

咁咪重賽?

作者: kyleung 時間: 2005-9-11 06:14 PM

烏茲別克要重賽俾人老屈架ja....

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-11 08:04 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-9-11 05:54 PM:
睇完昨晚場波,又諗返烏滋別克對巴林,...

個球証睇到先奇,我懷疑佢盲既,又冇主見啫= ="

作者: donald15 時間: 2005-9-11 11:17 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:43 PM:

新例唔係話要掂到個波先判越位既咩

新例只適用於國際足協
歐洲足協堅持唔跟國際足協用新例

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:40 PM:

的確係呀佢,皇馬果球12碼都係旁證話比球証聽既= =".....
仲有呀,羅賓奴有球波雖然大哨越左位,但係佢冇掂到個波既,羅賓奴射入左竟然話唔入

呢個吹越位其實都正常
呢球波朗拿度好明顯係有意識去追波,甚至有d幫羅賓奴做阻檔
所以球證舉旗都冇乜問題呀
況且新例只識用於國際足協

作者: lookityourself 時間: 2005-9-11 11:20 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 08:04 PM:

個球証睇到先奇,我懷疑佢盲既,又冇主見啫= ="

好似新黎報到搵個旁證照住

作者: bigfish 時間: 2005-9-11 11:36 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-11 04:43 PM:

新例唔係話要掂到個波先判越位既咩

因為朗拿度擋一擋個守衛, 羅賓奴先可以o係無人看管之下射入
so 皇馬有因為朗拿度而得益

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-12 12:09 AM

Originally posted by donald15 at 2005-9-11 11:17 PM:

新例只適用於國際足協
歐洲足協堅...

咁都要分歐洲同國際,真係膠膠地

你講果d我都知,可惜我太緊張= ="

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-9-12 12:10 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-9-11 11:20 PM:

好似新黎報到搵個旁證照住

似呀

作者: ciger 時間: 2005-9-12 01:37 AM

Originally posted by donald15 at 2005-9-11 23:17:

新例只適用於國際足協
歐洲足協堅...

我覺得新舊例都要吹

作者: 清揚 時間: 2005-9-12 06:33 PM

差唔多la,有前冇後系咁架la!

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)