娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [轉貼] (05-06年度) NBA 各隊預計既出場陣容 ---中央組 [打印本頁]

作者: tony529 時間: 2005-10-11 06:32 PM 標題: [轉貼] (05-06年度) NBA 各隊預計既出場陣容 ---中央組

分析 by at安東尼

中央組

芝加哥公牛

新加入:
Malik Allen
Eddie Basden

走左:
Antonio Davis
Eddy Curry

預計正選陣容:
PG: Kirk Hinrich
SG: Luol Deng
SF: Darius Songaila
PF: Tim Thomas
C: Tyson Chandler

正選競爭及重要既後備 :

PG & SG: Ben Gordon & Chris Duhon
            - 上一季Gordon已經證明自己既實力~ 得分能力強~ Duhon 係一個非常有potential既球員, 我肯定佢既出場時間會增加~

SF & PF:  Michael Sweetney
            - 本來紐約人將會讓佢當主力之一, 可惜佢黎左Bulls~  佢既實力不容小看~

注意球員:
Luol Deng ↑

中央組

克里夫蘭騎士

新加入:
Donyell Marshall
Larry Hughes
Damon Jones
Martynas Andriuskevicius

走左:
Desagana Diop
Jeff McInnis

預計正選陣容:
PG: Eric Snow
SG: Larry Hughes
SF: LeBron James
PF: Drew Gooden
C: Zydrunas Ilgauskas

正選競爭及重要既後備 :

今季既騎士好有機會入playoffs~  陣容耳目一新~  後備充足~

PG & SG:  Damon Jones
            - 外圍得分能力強~  做後備一流~  Snow 出場時間應該冇咁多~

SF & PF:  Donyell Marshall & Ira Newble
            - 兩個都應該有一定既出場時間~

PF & C: Alan Henderson & Anderson Varejao
   - Henderson 係一個唔錯既防守球員, 可能會有唔少出場時間~  Varejao在上季既表現唔錯~  籃板及進攻都有唔錯表現~

注意球員:
LeBron James ↑
Donyell Marshall ↓

中央組

底特律活塞

新加入:
Jason Maxiell
Amir Johnson
Alex Acker
Dale Davis
Maurice Evans

走左:
冇.

預計正選陣容:
PG: Chauncey Billups
SG: Richard Hamilton
SF: Tayshaun Prince
PF: Rasheed Wallace
C: Ben Wallace

正選競爭及重要既後備 :

PG: Lindsey Hunter & Carlos Arroyo
   - 兩個都用得過~ 一個老, 一個年青~ 睇下Flip Saunders點用.......

SG:  Carlos Delfino & Maurice Evans
   -  Hamilton 手感唔好就通常會退下火線先~  所以SG既後備表現機會都唔少~

PF & C:  Antonio McDyess & Darko Milicic
         - Larry Brown 係唔鐘意用Milicic, 但而家Flip Saunders執教, 希望佢會多d機會表現~

注意球員:
Rasheed Wallace ↑
Antonio McDyess ↓

分析 by at安東尼

中央組

密爾瓦基公鹿

新加入:
Andrew Bogut
Bobby Simmons
T.J. Ford
Ervin Johnson
Charlie Bell

走左:
Zaza Pachulia
Calvin Booth

預計正選陣容:
PG: T.J. Ford
SG: Michael Redd
SF: Desmond Mason
PF: Joe Smith
C: Andrew Bogut

正選競爭及重要既後備 :

PG:  Maurice Williams
   - 上季 Ford傷左, Williams都有唔錯表現~  如果Ford唔可以回復實力, 可能Williams會做番正選~

SF:  Bobby Simmons
   - 佢同Mason比較係會差d, 但佢都會有唔短出場時間既~

PF: Toni Kukoc
   - 記得佢所以講下~ 射手一個, 但老了, 慢了......... 但經驗豐滿~

注意球員:
Bobby Simmons ↑
Michael Redd ↓

To Redd ---  一個球員, 會想人因為underrate左佢, 而替佢唔抵..... 還是會想人overrate左佢, 而話佢唔值呢??

中央組

印第安那溜馬

新加入:
Sarunas Jasikevicius
Danny Granger

走左:
Reggie Miller
Dale Davis

預計正選陣容:
C: Jeff Foster
PF: Jermaine O'Neal
SF: Ron Artest
SG: Stephen Jackson
PG: Jamaal Tinsley

正選競爭及重要既後備 :

一個靚既溜馬陣容番黎喇~ 雖然冇左Miller, 但加左一個射手~

PG & SG:  Sarunas Jasikevicius
            - 我對佢認識唔深, 只知道佢係一個射手........  其實如果佢控球好, 傳球技術又得, 咁佢做PG位都會唔錯~

PF:  Austin Croshere
- 我感覺上佢改變左打法...... 其實上季已經變左......... 佢以前係一個射手, 三分也好準~ 但而家好似轉打內線..........不過佢都幾大隻, 夠撞~

注意球員:
Ron Artest ↑
Jamaal Tinsley ↓

分析 by at安東尼

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-10-11 10:16 PM

please have YOUR COMMENTS in here, otherwise, I will lock all of these posts
THANKS

作者: tony529 時間: 2005-10-11 10:42 PM

其實這些資料都係俾大家睇下, 討論下~

睇下中央組,

Bulls 剛剛trade左Eddy Curry & A.Davis, 換番黎既Tim Thomas 係唔錯, 但佢失誤唔少....  Knicks 放佢走係因為想Marbury 控制大局, Eddy Curry又可以加強內線~
Bulls 可能可以令球隊既球風(打快, 活躍) 發揮得更好~  但我唔係好睇好.......

騎士方面, guard位耳目一新~  進攻及防守都強左~  LeBron 打PG位既可能性都高, Donyell Marshall 打SF位, 配搭靈活~

活塞就冇乜點變, 主要係教練轉左做Saunders~ 佢之前用Garnett既PF進攻型打法多, 所以大家都會注意R.Wallace會有多d進攻主導~

公鹿我就冇乜意見, 主要睇下Andrew Bogut帶到幾多impact 到這隊~

溜馬在冇左Miller下, 又成功簽到一位射手~  加上Artest 番黎, 在東岸應該可以穩坐頭三位~

唔知各位有什麼意見??

brightlee兄都唔好只是整句please have YOUR COMMENTS in here就算啦..........
wt are ur comments?

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-10-11 10:44 PM

Let me to reply you tomorrow..
I am interesting to S_E_E this.. hahha
sorry, it's 12.41am in Sydney.. I need to Zzzz. cos working tomorrow
Yes... keep going for your 2nd, and your personal comments
Your hard working like this will get the rewards

+3

作者: tony529 時間: 2005-10-11 11:06 PM

Come on~

It's even 1:05am in Brisbane~

But I got class in the afternoon~ Not in the morning~

"Your hard working like this will get the rewards"

我好耐冇聽過這句......... 感動..........

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-12 12:13 AM

騎士看似大有改進。有好多球員幫輕James既得分壓力！尤其曉士係一個好好既幫手。進攻上佢地無乜大問題，不過問題所在在於佢地既防守上面。雖然曉士係一個好好既防守球員，不過除左佢之外，其他球員都係強攻弱守。而且Marshal 同大Z都係年老球員，尤其係大Z佢既腳都已經傷得好緊要。都幾令人擔心！Gooden上屆大打爭氣波，希望佢可以keep住啦。

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-12 12:18 AM

公鹿今年有望重回季後賽。新季中鋒值得期待。而且佢既到來另球隊花錢花得豪爽左。首先留得Redd之後仲簽左simmons返黎，實力進一步得以鞏固並提升了不少。依家果陣容都幾穩陣全面，替補力量又強左。如果Bogut 表現有驚喜，佢地有望做出更好成績。

作者: eyecandy05 時間: 2005-10-12 10:17 AM

WAIT Hold~~ The Bulls' lineup is off!

First off, The backcourt starting lineup is between Ben Gordon, Hinrich, and Duhon and that's IT! Eddie Badsen might come out as a defensive stopper once a while.

Luol Deng is THE starting SF and he is battling HARD with Noch. in the PF position, We have battle between Mikchael Sweetney, Tim Thomas,  and Darius Songaila.

Center position at this moment is the weaker pos.  Chandler is the expected starter and Malik Allen will be playing out of position to backup Ty.

Antonio Davis is negotiating a buyout  with the knicks and he will not see a minute in Knicks' uniform.  Expect him to be back with the bulls within the month or two.

To the BUcks

Bobby Simmons is a BETTER player than Desmond Mason.  Simmons just won Most Improved Player last year, he can shoot, and is a multidimension player.  He was the third scoring option behind Elton Brand and Corey Maggette last year with the Clips.  So dun look down at his ability.

Lastly about the Pacers:

Sarunas Jasikevicius is fellow country man of big Z of Cavs.  he can shoot and thats about it.  expect to see him as a sixth man.

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-12 01:32 PM

Originally posted by eyecandy05 at 2005-10-12 10:17:
WAIT Hold~~ The Bulls' lineup is of...

聽講會用Artest做後備，所以我林佢應該會係隊中的最佳第六人吧！

作者: eyecandy05 時間: 2005-10-12 02:03 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-12 01:32 PM:

聽講會用Artest做後備，所以我林佢應該會係隊中的最佳第六人吧！

Wah really? I doubt they will use Artest as a sub, even though I admit that I dun follow Pacers as much. Artest is crazy at times but he is also alot of talent wasted if put on bench

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-12 02:11 PM

Originally posted by eyecandy05 at 2005-10-12 14:03:

Wah really? I doubt they will use Artest as a sub, even though I admit that I dun follow Pacers as much. Artest is crazy at times but he is also alot of talent wasted if put on bench

我睇溜馬網頁講話因為見到上年馬剌擺manu落後備打有唔錯效果。所以都會係季初擺Artest落後備。一來唔會浪費左佢既進攻能力(因為多數由J.Oneal做主導)，二來可以令後備的深度大大提升。係bench度發揮出佢最大的功能。

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-10-12 06:13 PM

Sorry,. I was so tired... and I NEED TO work and survive... not as good as a student.. ....

This is my personal feeling for these team

1) Chicago Bulls, they make a silly trade.... Don't make it misprinted.... I am not talking about they lost Eddy Curry... I am saying they lost A. Davis.
Scott Skiles is one of the best coaches in NBA, well you could see what's happened when he was in charge for Phoneix Suns....

That's the major mistakes....... Any players could be traded except A. Davis
Why? Look at the rooster for Bulls now.. how many players have experience in NBA?
How many people are playing in clutch time before?

If Bulls maybe win by 4 in 4 mins left in 4th quater, then other team make a 10-0 run. they don't have a "spiritual" leader to guide them to pass this harsh time. They could get blow out straightly, as they don't have experience that can guide them back

Look at Bulls in early 90s, why did they jump up so strongly after they got Scottie Pippen and Horace Grant?
It's not ONLY their joining this team... One Man, you may never think about to lead this team in "spritiually", Bill Cartwright.

When you look at the stats, you maybe wondering why Bill Cartwright got a really bad stats, and he could start so many games.. this is the reason... "spirit"

For Bucks and Cavs

Sorry, they may not reaching their real potentials
Both owners did the same mistakes
They were fired their former coaches, Paul Silas and Terry Porter.
And they hire for a new coaches, who do not the NBA experience in head coach.
Sorry, poor them

Look at Cavs, do u remember why they were collasping at last year, nearly at the end of last season? The new owners buy the team........

Poor things was, when they lost 10 games after all-star games, they were firing Paul Silas straightly.
Look, who taught Leborn James to grow up in right way? Paul Silas

Cavs is stronger in stats, but Larry Hughes could come out with injury pluged? Can Larry Hughes plays good in SG and not catch too much balls?

Unknown.

Bucks....... Well, What could you expect if they lost their point guard?
Who were guiding them to have 41-wins 2 years ago? as all of the world were thinking Bucks should be in bottom 2 years ago?

Terry Porter and his assistants.

They didn't have good inside players since early 90s (after Terry Cummings were trade in early 90s)
When they lost their starting point guard last season, what can you expect this team?
Now, they get a good starting 5, and they could goto playoff more easier than before, but the new coaches may not guide them to reach their potentials

Pacers:

They lost Reggie Miller, but is that... that important?
It maybe at the starting of this season
But the main point is, they couldn't lost Ron Artest.

Before what's the incident in Palace of Auburn Hills, Pacers were 6-1
And Ron Artest was leading scoring, stealing at that moment.
Then they got really hurt after they lost 3 players.... for this incident and they never come back like what they were
(rememeber for the first month in last season, NO REGGIE MILLER in there)
the new point guard/shooting guard, Sarunas Jasikevicius could help this team a lot
Cos Tinsley is a injury-plauged person and he never reach his potentials
When he's not injury, Pacers could run smoothly.
But it's competely opposite when he was injury and no one could replace him
Jasikevicius could be a right choice for the sixth man in this team.

it's not surprised that Ron Artest could be a sixth man in the first few months, remember in emotionally, and in theoritically, he needs to spend some times to catch up NBA as he was emotionally out of control in Palace of Auburn Hills

Detorit Pistons:

Good thing is: they don't lost any major players in last year, except Larry Brown
Phil Saunder could be a good coach in this team

That's ONLY one problem, NO backup players/no 3 pointers.
Can you tell me who can shoot 3 pointers in this team in urgent time?
No, R. Wallace, Prince and Hamilton are not the sharpest 3 pointers in NBA.
Also, if one of the guards/Small forward will be injured, they will be in big troubles.

Remember they just have one man who could score on the bench, which is McDyess, but he's a PF/undersize center.

So watch out if they have injury problems.

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-10-12 08:26 PM

brightlee+3

作者: eyecandy05 時間: 2005-10-13 11:47 AM

Bright:

I think you have mistakenly judged the Bulls on the trade matter.  By all means, Paxon (Bulls' GM) has been trying to keep Eddy Curry (the main reason of this trade) from day one.  He has been diagnosed with potential deadly heart discease.  As you all probably know, Paxon requested a DNA testing for Curry to ensure that his "HEALTH" is good enuff to play and won't drop dead like Regie Lewis of Celtics back in the days.  This DNA test became the subject of the heated debate in the NBA this past off season.  Whether or not Paxon is doing the right thing really depends on each individual's view.  Personally, I think that when Paxon offered to pay Curry $400,000USD annually for the next 50 years if Curry failed the DNA test is one of the most caring thing a GM can do.  Look at bulls history, they paid Jay Will 3 mill after he stupidly crashed on his motor cycle.  Knowing Curry will go to court and sue the Bulls for enforcing such test, he leaves Paxon no choice but trading him to the Knicks.  Obviously, when you trade talent, you have to get equivilant value back,  talent wise and contract wise.  A. Davis holds one of the biggest contract in the Bulls roster and therefore is used to trade for Sweetney(great potential) and Tim Thomas (humongus contract for non-equivalent talent that the Knicks want to get rid of).  So if you are the Bulls GM, will you rather to have court case with your starting Center during the regular season that might distract the rest of the team then make this trade? This trade's trigger is all because of the DNA test, and not because of Sweetney or Tim Thmoas.

As far as Antonio Davis's case, they have managed to asked the Knicks in waiving Davis and so the Bulls can sign him up again.  So in reality, they are getting Davis back pretty soon.  However, some rumor says that Davis wants to retire, therefore there's nothing the Bulls can really do about it.

And the effect of losing Davis.  I have to disagree about Davis' "effect" on the team "spiritually".  First, Davis is 37 years old, even though I dun disagree that  Bill Cartwright was a valuable player, him and Davis are different.  Cartwright stood up aganist MJ's arrogance (you know why he had throat surgery? MJ threw him in the ground during practice coz Cartwright stood in his face).  And more importantly, Cartwright was in his prime and Davis is now reallly should be thinking about retiring.  The Bulls' age problem, dun look down at their bench, they have valuable veterans in their deep deep roster.  The team that hsould be worrying about age is Raptors.  Another reason why they won't miss Davis's service as much is their style of play.  Paxon and Scott Skiles built this team to win games with "EFFORT" and "HUSTLING".  As long as the run all over the court and play denfense, they believe they can win every game.  Davis is getting old to fit into this system.  Its time to let the young guns play.  Look, they got into the playoff without the service of curry last season, though its true that they will miss the post presense of him.  The east really only have 4 powerful teams, and the other 4 spots are up for grab.  This year's success will lie on Chandler, and Ben Gordon's development.  and I hope they can keep up with their effort play throughout the season, as Skiles won't let them become lazy.

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-10-13 04:11 PM

First of all, thanks for your comments
+3
Let's see how's going on in Bulls now, we will know it later 2 months later

One pre-season game showed nothing in there.

Well, I know Bulls didn't want to train Curry......
but I am mentioning about team development
They have verterans on the bench, but who have playoff experience?
this is the question mark in my head for so long

作者: eyecandy05 時間: 2005-10-13 04:57 PM

I agree that the current Bulls is still unknown.

Let me see if I can answer your question mark

In terms playoff experience, I think last year has shown that they and the Wiz have NO playoff experience. I think their strategy is to build playoff experience and hope to retain the current roster into the future. Expect to see Hinrich, Gordon, Duhon, Chandler, Deng, Noch to be with the Bulls for a long long long time. They are not worrying about experience at this moment, and also they are not aiming the championship this year. But they do expect to bring back the dynasty days in the 90s to Chicago in the near future with this crew. Couple more yeasr,, this crew will have more than enuff playoff experience. No MOre rebuilding!!!

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-10-13 09:29 PM

good comments
I agree what you point of views

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com./bbs/)