Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: $ k9 B; c; T. d' y3 d) a9 W1呀....................~~~ 8 W, c3 Z' `) b靚好多/\/\
- f Y( ^. S0 r# p7 O9 w+ l% j/ S2 a* m. N
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 6 A5 M5 }: G% y" T" m) R2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...- b* ]6 ~ x7 y9 {# \6 G
" [ k* E* y$ c. w. g }Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... 4 ^; Y; V. {% r9 o & m* ?& a+ _& K+ I# @ 8 {! t! t$ ]% J4 u# \( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 1 k, n) B W* p8 Y8 J. A第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...# B! l4 E8 }( O$ R: S" Z
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. ; m9 D- X+ b/ R% Q z6 _8 wsorry...