brightlee

Originally posted by 樂壇渣Fit人 at 2005-11-17 15:10:


今年可能有機會
因為目前黎睇, 無乜野強隊可以突圍與其一搏
(小弟愚見, 不喜勿插)

if that's no injury pluged for any spurs players.................

brightlee

Originally posted by Chenjinnan at 2005-11-17 18:53:


Hehe thanks. I love to watch pl...

He should NOT play for the playoff in 1999 @Pistons...

then he got seriously injury.....

brightlee

Originally posted by Dicksonheng at 2005-11-17 15:44:


就算有, 佢地後備陣容都係聯盟最勁啦!

But when you see M. Finley and B. Barry are injured now.
Spurs is inconsistence....

brightlee

Originally posted by wer at 2005-11-17 18:57:

Washington,Cleveland算 NBA 傳統弱隊?

Cleveland was strong in 90s

Washington was strong in late 70s, early 80s

Please don't think the team with C. Webber, M Price, J Howard was strong in Washington in 95-97..........

brightlee

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-11-17 19:32:

我都係咁睇。傷患會係馬刺最大既敵...

I watched the game for Cavs vs Spurs
they were leading by nearly 30 points around 4 qua..
but they couldn't shoot .......... even they have B Barry, Van Exel and Michael Finley were on the floor, lucky Cavs was cold on that day and they couldn't shoot any wide open shoot.........

that's why Spurs could be beaten........

see, they lost at least one match in season (at this stage)
so Spurs could be beaten.....

brightlee

Originally posted by peter仔 at 2005-11-17 20:51:
我覺得76人同巫師都勁左好多

76ers,
you should thanks for Maurice Cheeks.....

Now, you know how good he is, right?!

brightlee

Originally posted by kinis at 2005-11-21 12:28:
呢個現象好自然, 弱球隊用幾年至十年...

Remember on 91-92 season,
Dallas was 11-71?
next year, 13-69?
and in Dever on 97-98,
they were 11-71???

This is called NBA!!!
got it?!