LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢
) Y+ L. T/ t1 \9 v8 j8 v$ ~" |5 M, F因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權
3 H; s' h0 v' b8 G0 h% b! o以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:% [1 D, w9 j7 _
所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law
) g, U1 G5 x" @7 _4 H! w4 P8 x9 N$ J# j3 H5 \8 k$ M; z! p
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

# g. ^2 D( g) d" |
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:
3 I, `- R4 l' P( G9 n2 z: [咁就好正啦.../ F% P6 |2 Y; @7 k3 i; w# `
咁直係話個個出街攞住...

9 ]: s9 T' ~7 y/ H9 m- g2 V3 s
所以我先唔明
" w- a2 z; L% O  i咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜- M, ^" I. N3 t
棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
! C; ~' w* I' @! v  a1 E這是兩回事，1 {4 w; z" F) l; M1 R" V
MP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，
7 w/ @6 m7 B  v2 ?, g  v正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，: o; }8 y4 K6 T
與商品和商家無關.
4 [% n7 {9 k' u1 g" h雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......0 F- n% Y! \. T# Y& C9 ~

! i( J3 Z2 _% ~d公司全部都利字當頭7 ^9 e2 m4 _1 p9 C
佢真係睬你都傻啦..
' \( X. I/ o0 I( o9 n7 n5 [9 F唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:
+ Q5 P( D. ?4 A0 a  T5 I( W咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

5 _' G# f( E+ Z7 t我有兩部喎
0 `- s" V4 `: d' H: F. J咁我咪double懲罰??