F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
; q$ C  t2 X" g" t6 hM is for his pride; @4 a1 r, q1 o) l7 |4 e
L is for visiting her lover$ [* \1 Z0 r6 V* e: u; X
B is for money
1 D. J# J: x5 eS is for sex, x) c2 t. W, L  H. T) k/ B! x1 [
except F, he can't get anything
- d7 Z8 P1 [0 g) y3 t0 Zbut he just did something wrong for friends
" a' [7 B4 d; S4 H7 \therefore, I wound like to support F. i  [7 [+ ~) k" n
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
4 R% S( i1 u* `/ K" s1 r; E( t$ Y" p4 p* m  {/ R- a, H) l- M
from good to bad
# W( p; O8 ~8 W( aF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
0 R$ F. {/ J1 h4 P準時12:00  z/ O0 ~% m1 l7 X0 H( }6 b

! \9 z) O& B7 H6 b! t* P[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me; a2 o9 J: T3 a% u" U
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case  W, c$ H3 b3 D. M8 ?+ `( t7 x
# F+ ]: b0 I: q! s4 L& E) h! U1 a
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
; ~' S- C0 J  r) ~
$ q$ c  Q% k' T1 h7 Y$ BI believe this is very hard to be together
3 f2 t; L3 D* R8 Dbut I still trust that both of them can be together