jsqaure99

true say, good example.
0 l! b! b6 P- I/ A  t- X# iby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive./ n' _7 D: _7 l4 x
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.2 p4 S% G) q8 y% s
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
/ t1 u2 ~: Y9 y/ p: mNO OFFENCE 4 L8 _3 A) L& Z% |$ _2 ~8 q3 g* y7 h
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣0 o: X% n3 ~' C, y5 N$ I7 R) Y
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢8 t7 q* v% e& Q+ W* c* v
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢4 _$ @( W( W9 o
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢+ Q. A* ?4 |8 l2 u! R( d
我唔知: I- u& y1 f  w3 j, Z
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐1 F/ \$ j  y- j( X4 v; n
會唔會覺得未夠班呢: K  \. c7 i- r
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
, o$ W6 ?) {( [9 o3 b" R% ?0 w但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
, {5 ?* Y& a" w" N又點解釋1 i# Z3 H% o2 W1 h( c! N
) X# d/ @1 F8 S4 ~5 G& Z$ l3 o
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
* @+ D+ N4 e! |以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
$ l+ x4 W+ E5 x: |& g家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材& b2 N' z( F% o2 n
講得好
" v' b" a/ N& N/ B0 l+ X7 d6 g仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
+ M; @; U. f4 _& d% o我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
( h1 z  Y* M- S" x1 s
" C4 k& W7 Y3 \3 f3 f; O5 S
' A+ o) \+ P# ^5 i/ G証據...係要証實左既先叫証據1 t2 M9 X4 u6 M+ h

- ], l5 w$ @( w, R# m用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

; U7 N) ?+ Y- F/ h* F
9 l* D1 Z9 Q. Q0 c  m

8 o) O( r+ ~  }" ]" ]* n唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗