奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
# i& @* h8 [9 x' w
# d% F8 _" Y/ k9 pagree,
: C5 @" p. _/ z5 U: ]. i9 h: T我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,, ?( u/ L# ]! D# \6 A8 Q. Q
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
' v: ~* Y& j' [& h  U2 G  S: a期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

) I3 T6 l7 m* r) ~7 uhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html6 p3 k( @: w8 r
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, n( G! ]* n; x0 u5 j$ ?搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media./ R  H% w7 A  E" E' o0 X' }8 x
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
2 J1 ?6 a6 d2 b) C+ f! F3 X有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
7 u6 c$ U( o9 y( }
, V* v7 v/ {$ P; _( L係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???4 c# ?0 o0 x6 b

  L6 ~& ?# B& U/ {! @" I為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 E# Y, }& ^2 s* n9 ^6 H  g/ v0 d& g* t! }# h$ R
絕對支持啦. T$ x7 @6 S- i) Y# [5 k3 K
& I! W. f# {9 t# d
有錯就認,打就企定2 a9 \! J" n; `) ~% d/ b
; q1 W5 i5 ]  C
無錯當然要撐到底( q3 O6 u: @2 A6 k. I
5 b4 x5 g0 }/ B. @! u9 E
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
1 ^2 x5 x7 e* K+ W
4 B2 S' E, Y. J; x5 V2 i( F在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
* Y2 ~' D- ^6 L! V0 I* A6 N% x! _: i
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力1 x7 ^9 i* K# E0 z* T
+ X  g* G; G7 N
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
6 Q# ^0 T, e; p! i: y1 H
+ s( f. a& j9 N" W$ P4 h8 r8 T6 ^唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
# H+ ?2 ~' ]- n8 O# B
, x0 R2 ]! U/ L) R我唔認為lor3 z% l7 b' E1 z5 P; j: [
2 Q0 o5 t% o5 w5 r, {' s6 ?3 v
唔係話要整死佢地
* r3 o' v  I2 l0 N0 Z
( m3 H; }, s1 ]! ~而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
; f& j! B$ P0 O; ]5 ]/ [/ m5 |
, E  c+ g7 H/ L7 y我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
) ~# j* _; p. @6 k
5 z" L+ ^( ~* b: k- ~7 J有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
. O% _; }' z. M% U8 m/ s- r; D- d0 x6 g  E; |& i- U
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由; r; o7 U' l! y% R0 W
! Y- g6 c/ Q  M: `2 N' c; G4 Y, g
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句, T6 o3 L) H  _: r8 @7 B! d
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"1 g; [- Q$ V9 A1 Q- |. P* C# n

: I6 T5 E+ A# ~0 W我們的大學生
$ @% _5 R$ J3 u/ }6 k4 _) o5 e3 e) v, q( \& M' O- w
9 Z& a0 |9 i' r* I2 b) P$ Q
( W7 t1 S3 r1 {. w0 U$ B; |
* @% Y6 d  @9 \/ \$ n

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:- v5 p9 D5 f* f1 t

( {/ t/ k' o& M1 W0 W
. R/ G: q& H8 H  H有見地 !!!8 x3 v' Z# T+ r, C0 M# O
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' O) o! A/ s  z' p- `
3 B$ y. B5 x: ~5 f
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) S% H3 w3 X6 K6 M' \
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
6 w+ w# ~  j  c& M! n! vI pretty sad that about the University official.
& }; u- ~' Q1 C; ~+ ~% CIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la+ B# [# F% F+ J) o/ P

: A  u% C9 \' c[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:  v  }3 ]  l2 x7 F3 ]1 Z8 p
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la8 V. d9 [' L! k1 y# \

) B. u: W: |: j[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

5 G4 a5 W! [7 J) D4 J  P4 a
( ~- B0 Y: z+ ]9 i" f+ N9 E
兩者有何分別?
& Z5 N; B8 k( O# t( b! r中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?