<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
  a" b# e, m, `0 t但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
7 u( E% o/ ~2 d* G  J. n9 t7 W大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
/ X" P6 Y  N. ~( U+ MI agree you points that it could be illegal
# `* H  o4 a/ U- K. R! N4 rbut that is still a "gray area"
$ s. K: N7 ]0 Z5 c  A9 `& j' Ywhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair2 e( g9 `! K& s1 X
6 F' a" w* J, g3 m4 a1 l
anyway, I want to say that is
. J) X; ~- x! @4 j. e' n5 U$ @6 a, y1 cwho is supposed to be protected by laws! X0 ]: J( C7 J/ ?
creators?5 i/ O( L" D  |# |; ]0 k7 L; j
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
/ n1 t! `+ b% w" C! I" T% }5 Hlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
& E6 E* Y" l8 S' f0 K- P+ Rwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those# |, ^! t- w- d- K' L& f; |
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
/ Z( J, f/ g% u5 W其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
' K8 ]* {; ]% R6 K& K" V7 O8 _; V7 e
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
- {) G. {3 M9 v5 \- H" W0 Q9 E
: z( v+ a  Q' \我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
% t0 @  V: @) x唔係喎!
- `" j5 [7 K4 k# r1 x古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!2 b9 c' d7 a: S: D5 t7 w( b0 a, K) v
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& J0 g; `3 e- n佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!# O- w: i0 c! \+ q% a2 U
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
! a8 ~2 A# {8 w0 D, R一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
0 V' \6 `) S  Ldun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......7 A5 ?: {. z9 n# Y
if so bad, dun download la, right?1 |: |$ H0 M9 m! r7 @
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
' q2 C4 U. P2 K# z5 hbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct/ ^& G# u' |( x. _
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
+ K( b5 \- V/ o4 F( Nso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society- x( V) d' q( r
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........2 L  |" h0 n* s$ |
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
4 k/ V% _# M# E% Fso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!/ b  @  e; z! i* l
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
4 i: R# L* `3 }! Y% u政府想比下馬威0的人~~
& h! o& w; w$ b( T+ P. h8 N$ S錢就一定罰
8 a. l, R+ B9 N) Z8 I9 T" l未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,) m: I% q5 o% B/ t" S
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?3 l  u, z% O0 P6 ?. l$ R, Q
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  h* E. s, y( P7 e4 s3 Z5 S2 b
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。