Rika

由最好排到最壞4 _2 ^2 `' a( t" E
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
4 R5 Q4 x  z& E. u( s2 A; X4 eB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount0 M7 u( ^, Z9 l: p) r5 S
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
% u6 t- h2 x5 E% G5 RM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
  ?6 l' F6 L" c* D' c; B4 gL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:5 Y" P0 y. p) n3 V  [5 c" b

0 q/ _: W4 J% K) D4 s, w+ {M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人7 @$ C4 ^! g- k" R/ I5 O
0 i0 b9 D6 m$ R; U; `
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
( N8 t' m5 k% a5 n1 k     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
  h8 u5 ?. {3 ?  u
* R- g- k% {2 ]  @- S. L& W! l$ |B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做2 G( ~" F+ r/ T( w

, s1 c5 C; F. @: YL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志: L/ X( t7 k; d4 J! S" o9 g

9 J/ g  b2 V  ^/ k6 TF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
  x) b( n  }! x9 q" r     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好7 \2 t5 ~* Y+ z8 p+ B) k* s. r

1 j, i  d2 z! D0 |3 v# p% ?[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案% h7 R0 e# [7 ^3 u( @1 _
而家答多次, |/ a/ L/ n  S) G
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽# V+ O: ~) X0 O1 f( |6 y4 P
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架! `( k! w9 O3 x( L7 i9 ]$ n
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
3 J4 Y7 v- J9 m/ z6 l8 Hs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
) q) s4 q. q9 n- ^+ V6 K0 v) ~m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S# b0 h0 C3 Z* D+ }- A: |
* m4 o8 y  B& Y! N6 a' q
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
- _& x3 w1 O, O& I# b! U. LF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
9 l* k6 ~( E, BM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒- t$ ^& y1 a) ?% [* Z" |
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
' d6 \' d6 ^: D1 q& yB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
7 u& ?" Z) a& _3 b9 NF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
4 `1 S. ~. `% A- ]7 HS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
, i- l- P& c1 V  ]  RM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法# T( e6 d& p" L9 K- i1 u$ f* \. N
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果2 N) x) p& W6 ~
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
; Z6 Q# e7 {4 l  r6 ?4 x
( H; F  k/ P; ]: B7 p% r4 G% t& k: T世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:0 c' U% {5 f- R; m5 Q% ^
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己6 w* i" w, g: y( D
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
8 g  _, ?! @+ tS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件9 F8 I1 [3 v: H2 a
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
; x# ^% c6 ]5 r/ L' PM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

' @/ B- d4 w7 q5 T) m
# O0 O" {) l7 [3 b/ [- m0 p same choices with u , but want to add some comments
7 p8 v3 \( F0 u( S# o4 Q3 V
/ _7 K$ l6 H6 G" lB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
) S: _+ W" t0 b6 z" d' [- O: O3 k: ?! Z5 b4 p2 g& ]( y; e
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )1 ~( k2 K0 m# b# ^: ?7 |, M

0 v( Z0 Z! J% B) b5 fF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome - w7 Q$ {+ ?7 p# J/ t* t

& O' F  b4 d2 MM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......  V: T3 X, j7 V, `, N( [3 v

% a  f% z' }1 w3 A7 ?[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
5 G# U- ~8 e: I% p. r6 FM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢/ c' U* i5 [. f7 a" o; o# B
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
' U& G+ r: j/ p  Z! {8 K) Q) |F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ _' [. z: c7 V7 w: d! H7 |

% W2 q' }) P0 Q! b, E, `( X6 ?. ?最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
# c& C+ [) Y4 l7 @( G有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
: c" M2 R) [+ ?: C' `7 g' @$ b由最好開始排起既話，
* w) K( k; U( \- jL B M F S 啦，
+ s; m3 e* Q5 d1 ]
, a5 `! i' O4 i$ G/ K! L  D其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
5 C' ?0 I$ S1 H) j1 x, u& }% ~但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
, d2 F/ ]* f" y6 W% k2 R如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？* [' C; n' {0 Z7 Q( b# D  M2 w# y
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
9 ?7 y3 D8 e4 C- B' e/ w3 W, j& k5 O0 ?8 s
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
1 S/ m5 J1 M; \- q7 k所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
$ a# D5 Q- _" y1 a& m( p明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
) C6 P& R! T1 l# W3 r$ l
( X& M7 p6 i' U8 Y而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
( X9 [7 s7 |/ g* l M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
5 l  Y( q( x8 |7 y. E) h0 J  `& m亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，: A) d/ r1 M0 t& v$ [% C5 ?
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- t9 f( i% ]( G2 V! E- f
M 都可算壞了。
% K1 O4 k. e$ S& i6 e. X
  Q( E; O- i4 t6 c- T F 呢個人仲掂，' K" K) ~8 p9 ^+ l4 w2 x, |
知道既唔等於要講，, }! l" G3 {; t2 h! V% N# M
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
3 y  y2 ]$ l' l7 D- C( g$ \我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。. P3 u9 l' b- q1 r. T
7 p/ E6 y" l; Q. K9 q$ I+ X7 w
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，+ V( U6 t7 r2 @+ v
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
- x9 M3 k, B  Z/ ~1 ]& I
- W& @+ E: E3 t! f9 {: Z" G7 B8 P8 }' R3 [
0 Z% _7 r, d3 W
題外話：
; j1 @( c2 B' H7 p唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，5 {3 n: f$ g- \, k8 i5 I
睇到 S 呢條友，9 T( I( C, a  w7 ]9 O1 J% b
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
4 m. _1 S; N" g/ z" @2 ?  k
' P. J2 o4 d/ N% US: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ f; _/ u. y/ ?6 j' a' OF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係3 Z+ }+ O/ u8 S; d. n$ j
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她+ L* e/ L& \" I$ M, `/ a
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害" E% y" V# H. |6 |
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...