data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30915/30915f88e260985fb707cfac662273f12ffae7cb" alt="Rank: 2" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30915/30915f88e260985fb707cfac662273f12ffae7cb" alt="Rank: 2"
- 帖子
- 2903
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 212
- 魅力
- 379
- 讚好
- 0
|
16#
發表於 2007-9-10 01:29 AM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by 迷途小羔羊 at 2007-9-10 12:13 AM:
講中左咩?我諗係你未明個point起邊... 如果每一場比賽要一射就入, 做到叫做射, 中龍, 入波,
我估足球比賽既比數會似排球比數....data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88e95/88e953891b544c1e440da8524a60b4527ea0cc79" alt=""
我無講過英軍無浪費過chance, 但成場計浪費既必入波,
只有3比0後owen單刀果球, 其他大浪費機會既波唔係咁多...
以色列係打得唔好, 因為個中場輸晒又無反擊,
但如果英軍尋晚攻黎唔流暢亦入唔到波,
曼聯1比0贏新特蘭果d就叫浪費機會啦 !!
england第一球波, 係以軍裝upsite失敗, 而且swp非常之快,
只要j.cole出到d咁既波, 相信好多歐洲一流球隊都有機會領野..
至於owen第二球, 純個人技術, 我唔覺得係以軍自己有問題 !!
我個人係完全否定麥卡倫呢個領隊, 但一樣還一樣,
佢地尋晚巴里負責掃蕩,j.cole,swp有波交比希斯基,
謝拉特owen後上, 兩翼側擊一套好簡單既打法,
佢地完全做到晒賽前既部署, 有成34個主力缺陣,
我真係唔知如果咁都叫打得唔好, 咁點先要收貨? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f153/7f15337264de0c03b8a25c5b6e42d983dfc5ed91" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f153/7f15337264de0c03b8a25c5b6e42d983dfc5ed91" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f153/7f15337264de0c03b8a25c5b6e42d983dfc5ed91" alt=""
我無話以色列打得好勁, 但如果英軍自己無料到既,
佢地點樣輸個中場都未必會輸波, 因為901都係可以守和人既...
曼城, 雷丁都打得唔好, 因為曼聯自己打得差, 一樣贏唔到!! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ae15/2ae1590f67a752dfe2a8799353c8982cb355cfb4" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ae15/2ae1590f67a752dfe2a8799353c8982cb355cfb4" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ae15/2ae1590f67a752dfe2a8799353c8982cb355cfb4" alt="" |
|