Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
  V' k+ e- k+ q- D4 n  Y! x- G3 v- K7 A* A# I- _

  Y: @" f/ v; l6 b5 @% Y3 \7 ^我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; M$ v% E: Q! j* T. M' Q. G& j: Y' T0 x' i. \3 j3 r2 V8 c
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:% I9 @5 U6 t7 Q1 {6 U; a

) ]" O' G) ?. Q7 i
, `. y" w. k% u; t( E4 n0 V! K: R: AIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

9 f9 {# m' U2 g" a+ P2 _
- z* _$ h: N. J, ?# koh really...
  a/ \% }1 z) P  e1 _0 n  u7 Chahhaa, thx a lot^^": {6 C8 \- s9 t( A7 M" x
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
+ A9 i* |  m7 s2 b  S: J" [/ X5 ?) H7 t5 E7 h. V" `# U- s+ V
當然這是個假設性問題
+ i6 [7 P' Y* z* x& h; i( ]但將人數倍大" E* F2 P/ Z# N, ]" Q  S- M
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
5 q9 ?; P$ r3 ]. m% {& W9 w(情況可以換作其他)7 j3 A# d& Y2 n: z" Z" v) o
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
- @9 @" [1 f) r7 P, f1 ~如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 Z1 ~7 I6 B8 p- y. i5 q1 c% M如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
$ u/ U. A# O! P; j' h絕情谷既問題...5 k3 c" d6 g& x5 M2 t
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...# l3 i+ G+ o6 Q! B# V5 R% W
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: y/ K* }1 E, q! E) J& w- l$ q  V$ V殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* X$ `8 j& E0 Q7 V+ C, Z+ i
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
& l: i6 e; `% y. {3 r但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
) Y8 m$ m# Y4 v* X( E, @1 G1 u- d好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
1 ~2 P9 K0 l* x1 K6 n' T- n3 o其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
2 U9 Q& s  d* }0 a" c" L9 ~6 p  O8 z* K' K& V4 i. c
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
" N/ u/ n8 J# T5 ^7 z不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:) w; }6 Z+ b9 x2 s
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

3 B/ [( \9 l, k; ]* y0 I

# t! _( V9 {. R, o; B1 Z6 |4 ghaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣) c: ?! d6 G1 s
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....8 Q" G% u1 k( v+ U8 ?/ I% y

, x6 M9 }& s+ s1 b- dp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
" y0 w1 b2 {' A8 X5 uyes, my reason is helping more
7 D2 Y6 @0 }- R  W3 {( kfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!; i6 ~1 N. c4 h, d4 }
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
' N: Y0 I( h4 \1 W1 M% \' \because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?  {1 p/ k% M2 i* ?
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
: r, }3 }# i: Nmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!1 u5 M: I* W9 r( k3 C/ S
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~' ^- R7 ~1 R3 H+ G+ s$ ]
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
" ~& [, U. x3 O/ L' ^! D我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~; w5 E8 n7 x8 l
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
4 e6 z+ L5 c/ I$ }0 a. w即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
/ ^& A7 i+ ?) D# z我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
  ^$ ]4 z0 N( M0 d$ j但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
  F. C2 r! m) a0 t我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）