Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:  E; F' p" e0 ~8 q( A

# w$ w( i0 B# l& `7 m+ p  G. O8 F) `9 S* N6 s
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

& v% _5 ~7 T* G0 v) G9 |7 ~& e- |: j
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:$ W2 X4 x1 t& ]; w7 U; y

( X! \" K8 l5 e9 M0 v
9 f6 C5 n( N8 X0 {In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

3 S. y9 b5 a4 U' T) {7 `
3 j0 A$ p- ^/ B2 \9 uoh really...! Z% p( w" I: f
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
! E5 c+ n% W* g# J* D) A3 ~. @; ~' Si didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
0 E. x+ G- Z, s8 }/ P' A; ?
0 E( e& U$ M: h4 ^當然這是個假設性問題0 C- @" L. a  J1 e- f+ F; W% b
但將人數倍大8 [! k: h' d- I8 Y8 ?# u
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
6 s/ X% r* q5 ]$ z  ~6 g(情況可以換作其他)* a+ Y. h5 r2 C
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...6 f0 s# E# s1 D* G9 i; W; d
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
- |; N6 N$ y9 M# l1 R, d如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:; o" y* {) n1 d2 y; y4 @' g8 o1 Z
絕情谷既問題...0 R! @4 G. C8 I. e
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
) ^1 M: c( y. y* g) p. ]如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: s. |- g1 [7 J% y7 Q* i
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好& N$ n8 @8 t+ i( O' J, z8 _
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生6 G% d( s1 \: Y1 O
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- Z/ `+ x( b/ _* @1 L! Z好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢0 d! H" p3 N; m4 M) h
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! H3 \* z1 W7 H  n
) \  e' K$ C! U& `1 s我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命8 z; G: b3 m7 J
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
2 `* G3 Q  B( `3 N其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( I2 L& x- f4 D
9 F8 d0 V! ?& X3 ?' `; [5 P
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
) Z# Q3 e5 T/ X; k3 C你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...." a: W% r2 ]8 Z5 E& e/ `! p

; w9 e+ y0 X4 }" c% }1 J& h3 F. Ap.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child: g/ }1 T5 _, ]
yes, my reason is helping more
3 k) X1 }% x7 Vfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
- l; y( d  _8 K1 l8 x* d# zif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child( n, e& u6 o0 P# h: P
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?) `: p, K* g" s! p
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
4 X$ M! b7 ~' e, p. r: b  jmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
' H6 B: Q% g( K+ Cunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~7 Y9 O9 W# W; ?# q$ Q$ t3 y) `
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~+ [, u$ i/ i3 D1 \& {" Y. }. U' }
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~3 X) |4 p1 j3 p" o3 c/ O
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~! v$ i: A; \3 M$ r. K; s
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
$ A* I! K* C: I3 C. n, b; p我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
2 D! ]; o( [; p但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
2 t# Q' D& H0 \我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）