Rika

由最好排到最壞
: c5 D! b! P/ EF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
5 ]; e" S0 w+ S' s5 k0 U3 N2 iB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 U/ H5 I# W8 x1 o- s" k
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her- Y% t2 A9 f" i# q( p. [5 _$ p+ I, B
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure6 u9 C5 R, i8 }& @3 \3 z7 b
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:  W5 A( P* b+ Y& W7 j0 a
: a/ H3 F! }2 D5 m. L
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人5 ?+ Z; I. w4 S* O
# I4 r8 I3 U* O) b- l: o6 F1 k
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
7 q, v) b8 N  `     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
2 h1 L$ y' Y3 m
$ F8 L$ w3 I% OB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
- L3 r, A) @+ X4 i- r4 @% B. w' B. ~
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志" }* g7 I9 E; H- s5 C
0 A3 d: a. y: c* {/ r3 F  e
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,( }  e/ q# e0 I2 A
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好2 T/ t  j% g( G

8 ?" L  }( B# I0 H; Z[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案% y1 U- Y9 W/ O, P( A3 K
而家答多次6 Q2 g, W; l7 k
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽( Y+ S3 A; e2 \$ h' o. W
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架: D) s( t% O* ^8 k
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢$ H* a$ K. r5 T
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
! f: ]3 c7 C0 R5 z9 bm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S+ @; d2 ?4 N2 N/ e3 h# B
, Y% E# S# Q1 |- h7 J/ j
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大, J# V2 T9 W1 W7 V9 \4 ~" v3 \
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
9 @# I' i7 q9 b0 y. i# J0 kM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
9 u: V3 h- N; U3 A3 |* uS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
8 ?4 e; b7 X/ t& l: PB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞* i- ?. v! b5 B8 k* D: B: a) g5 {
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"' r# t$ ?3 r( n" V% S- G) P
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取4 v- j$ {. D0 t9 |. p. _  _  x
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法% w( y3 o$ q6 ~& m  J
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果- c0 p6 e6 L. ~" y/ a& `
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情) q, ]* b6 p3 c) `0 k
' n, L( u$ d$ A9 o/ x" O
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
' S- F( H' N1 _8 ^3 K' KL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己( F, v$ ~* ~2 A  x& N, f
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘3 H% W, |# P" y. q
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
# H9 W& S, o8 AF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方. w- [9 C3 p- O. S  C8 C, Z/ r* ?
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ m  I9 U) T, e# w' i& T( u3 O1 [
* }8 E$ H0 w. z3 }! {2 M same choices with u , but want to add some comments 1 M" S" Z! o4 @& v7 q3 T2 {
0 j+ @" J) Q( {8 I# `$ e  E3 w3 D3 ^
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
, }% k1 |. |' ]9 u4 W" W
: b! B7 F0 N6 K0 p% X2 sS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
6 v$ |/ }2 N! c9 ]8 i
# R1 w, h/ {/ _  C) I+ \1 HF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 5 w. b9 g  z- p
, E- z# e2 ^9 O6 u
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......7 c0 l7 O5 }. o' y2 ~0 O
9 C) q* z) s) k7 U0 ~$ E, j6 Y
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
: k1 H1 `" }# H" RM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢4 v' a& j5 g7 p7 X" h' z
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點) E( c' p- k! h1 j! N
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma) S, n  U* V- }' T1 i

/ a; W7 r, k; A最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....6 @* t4 d7 y$ N
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，1 d& {# m  P8 c. q. _
由最好開始排起既話，2 E3 ^/ J. b; g# z2 v  d* K) ^
L B M F S 啦，
: A5 O' ^0 X: K: t5 L1 N8 A; p8 J* f7 {% [# m9 u
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，2 |( x5 T3 N2 T1 ~" E9 P3 l
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
8 M  k& i; Y+ q5 _5 q$ B  j  X) O如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
$ k- f6 m) t, W又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
$ G2 g* b/ ^/ I7 R. {+ r6 a& x0 r2 d4 X
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
: i# I- k! q2 s5 _% e4 E  b% W所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，/ ^' w8 ]) R5 `: J" m
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。% `0 B. |+ h7 h) T

6 v; R4 F/ o+ @# A9 }而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，/ R" P9 h( d1 [% T8 g
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，9 y  z+ _0 B2 @9 \5 Q% D
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，$ v; W' q5 U7 Y, l1 Z2 v5 n: V3 S
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
  C! M% R5 w' ?) M. `- a M 都可算壞了。4 h" x0 y; r% m
3 N0 W( _4 B. A, b
F 呢個人仲掂，
8 _" ?/ q) ]7 w知道既唔等於要講，
) G1 ^+ D+ b1 E如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
% I' `. {3 `7 d; @* g我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。! V8 c/ |/ U+ `% B; y
/ }/ s; ^) f; z& X4 \. n; j
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
9 Z' Y: I! q7 D3 ~5 ?2 n' Y始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
* s5 L( @" p! J: M7 ^7 J5 w; ?; j) q

" w" X2 Z* @( m- Q4 b. K( c8 j3 ^' }2 J0 E
題外話：2 n% F# D) a6 j: k/ ^: k% k
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，0 ~* c0 S% o8 Y4 G
睇到 S 呢條友，* a# _" i( @& _
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
$ o) _8 @4 m7 z$ V. y) S6 p* d  |7 R& t+ M; Q
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
8 F0 }* d" f1 QF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
7 J8 E  W; r8 fM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她: W3 {1 E: b* ]" t& A7 y, f5 v* g
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
) \( @7 ]1 k$ G7 @. d9 h# wL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...