- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.$ _2 }* g# P' g. K6 B
8 f4 h4 F6 W9 f3 f
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.7 j6 r r+ Q B# R) y( t! ]# {& \) ?
& R9 ~. G2 v- xIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
, J C0 ?; F& Z6 n; A" a; Gand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
' W1 U+ L6 z" f! G" z6 X$ {* d" C+ k7 W( H& Q1 I3 v3 l
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險8 d0 c' y( l$ |1 @2 @7 L
( D* K o( {* T" s1 ~! j9 Z0 {6 w2 L* @in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, $ ^4 d& c( u; W. |7 k' R, H
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|