vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:% R: v% G  d: S% z+ f
反轉黎諗
! z1 n% B: k# z% \9 eps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版: L  y- O8 H( n9 Y5 q: G
你睇下DC,X-box
2 a5 Q9 o/ ~( h: _6 o. Y同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比2 ]4 i& J% F5 s0 n6 E2 H) X1 n
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

7 `4 x% U+ l+ ^( Y7 S講中曬!!!
" r3 `. D# k9 s4 J9 F5 x* ^0 v% u8 u* ~# \/ _  W" l  R& m
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。; V; \1 Q+ L" _: W' ?
3 {1 U& n% n8 {: E! A$ c+ \# i2 Y
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
- Y2 y9 r) X( v物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

+ z2 l& i2 ~7 ]# m$ U% h
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖- r) \  L& B4 v+ n5 \
8 ?* ~% E" }* l0 W4 V+ D
要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps25 F: p- U' g1 G
) c; [! W7 w& h' [
其實政府今次立法原意係岩
3 u, z( \( k4 N/ x4 z3 \但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權
& A+ l2 `- \& c( o. B/ y9 M唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管( F# T/ a+ ~7 G' i+ _! C
4 g; C/ ~: A( c+ X
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事$ j- K4 n$ C- o' _
一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
/ a4 M6 x. j; @9 s* ~; E眾所周知
5 t# u* Q$ U: T' |5 i' Q/ Z' lps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版! v4 l9 _: x; R( z  ]
佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2! s" }* c1 w( R" x# H' L
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
* z* Y" x6 p8 s. W+ h# A: Q& s) H3 p8 B, F  c
講中曬!!!
* r0 l9 W& @1 z/ W0 |* S& Z
( U/ H: O% Y4 b: P仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。0 o# b5 K  @: ^. f1 c5 Z( ~& K( j
; x. g  N, @/ \  i3 ]6 Y: Z
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

7 l% ^" S/ |) o6 ~9 s) P( L/ W' ~5 g對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
2 d7 m3 b% o' s6 Z3 p
6 B' u7 R  q& C8 |6 x; bps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
1 W% j( J+ ^2 ^, C4 F其實最簡單一樣野
2 D2 u, o# k( H2 L$ q  [3 J: X' U正版好似翻版咁平
* }7 q  C# Z5 l" V. n) [或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
. O0 e: G. ^. [; Y, L7 V% Q/ |咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?! ^, D# D7 \+ `1 C2 W7 Z9 D# F- l" R
* R6 d* v+ A! E% J# C" P$ i
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子
& U: v$ b" M0 p因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,9 J+ d1 N( k; h) ?: G/ f
但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法5 K" P2 L- o/ C2 X
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣1 s9 M9 H$ `# }4 \* J8 Q
再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
4 s- b8 ?( z: l. Z% f改機既用途% u! q2 n. [, }6 {8 j: s
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉
& R( S% s1 ~1 |: s( \政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~ . P* }6 Q" r% t, S% B. A0 D
我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』