Rika

由最好排到最壞( W2 O& r6 A4 z" S4 I( ]
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong6 X% J0 ]  d* F! g4 X6 R
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
0 z: W4 k/ z3 j* |4 ?. q) ~- zS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her( c$ V9 i% A9 v5 X% ], {6 {
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure" _& m0 B# x# c+ v/ w0 J. g
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:7 P4 W5 d5 m$ L  l

/ N. P3 i) Q# D/ D: T5 wM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人5 P5 b  l+ j0 G5 S
6 Z" C! s1 L' p& A
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)+ i7 ~9 m# i! y" y% b' Q
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!! x  r- F, d% v/ i1 y
5 s1 m4 L9 @9 g$ p# C9 H
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
& A& K7 T  h; p/ h; m/ v' }: g( j! K6 R
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
2 y8 P6 O9 p/ u' S6 l
+ s. [# }4 `; `- WF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
# D6 M& e1 c+ S! b. S9 L) |' x. F5 S     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好/ B3 `: g6 w8 {
& f6 Q0 t; y) k/ s
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案8 }, h6 J0 \! o6 K9 F5 S4 c2 v
而家答多次
7 Q( `, s2 i7 b4 H% i# m: nf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
( {& g# Z5 |2 X, Xl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架) L8 |5 b) w6 k0 {+ p
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢' Z: {  t- |0 `- ^
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.5 K7 k$ f3 |3 X7 T5 S( q7 t9 X( B
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
' w/ G' c/ Z+ U- l
2 p# \: v- }& d. nL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
" K/ _% X/ M  s, O% uF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度% o" l+ T. t0 s
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒; T1 L, S3 v& @
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢. u1 S$ Q4 h" _, S: `0 C7 W
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞9 _3 K+ V: _8 j. D  E+ m
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
$ l+ `9 V( K$ f% lS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取0 t& P9 z% e* t/ G+ I% ^+ B& v
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
) [, e3 \# o" T4 d- w! dL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
3 Z) c; x5 R/ OB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
9 R0 a+ M5 r* J. e& M8 K" g' u4 S
& N  w- s+ Y- i3 ?3 D4 q8 w. S世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
0 z+ N$ [8 ?+ OL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
* m0 S, |8 B7 b( L: ?B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
9 T* W; \8 I9 I) @1 }4 P' @S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件: ^/ \$ e3 i* X; l
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 M. `& U5 y, j; l: MM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 _3 ~& c, k# U6 B
6 X) }5 M6 o- {* d7 O& d# V9 @
same choices with u , but want to add some comments + q! T$ D# W3 u$ T2 ^( N

/ x3 R! b% l6 h5 \6 b  _9 B9 GB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
8 `( z  i2 i( g" |
( O4 q8 J7 p9 [) v: DS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
  n. L$ C( I: B6 ], R" Y, G5 M5 y! _( M- E1 F
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ; b0 H8 u: b+ u3 h1 @
* u: ~0 _5 v* a. g. u9 Y' [1 H
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......+ F9 I/ S9 r3 m3 I' T

+ F9 p5 o8 C# L( l% h+ h- S2 J3 R; i[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
. f$ J. B. z. @+ r+ pM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢* j' |+ K6 p$ U9 v! O1 l
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點* L9 D( W3 n: Y3 ~) `* g- K+ y
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma3 |3 n, }) u+ a2 W* D  ^& n

0 [$ o& ^4 p$ {  x' U; N% K最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
5 I* B% f, e7 P' K有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
8 O5 U' K) g" ~) A! P1 M  F: B, M由最好開始排起既話，
# ?  ]# X8 N' {( E- q1 s' QL B M F S 啦，- y% o$ I# x" {2 _- A& F

5 q+ O7 b3 s7 u- [# \其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- n) j5 S+ J* v: `/ N
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？& y' {$ f% Q: a' X- b
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
1 }& F7 w7 }8 ?" U( ^: Y0 w  _又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。8 x' `' J2 I, c2 T7 @/ L
5 B0 R$ P) G4 C2 P! ]
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
7 W# \& B6 t- m! e( c. y所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
# X4 l. k; @9 i7 `2 _4 e明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。5 s$ J; E( A  r8 H

  M2 Q- f, ?8 }) L( r5 i而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，- Q7 a' ?! F% `' v1 m3 P' Y
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
- u$ D' F, @5 w$ Z- R亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
. k; E% J) O. B# y知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，  U5 }) F7 u0 S) p
M 都可算壞了。! s9 S! X* k/ c. Y6 C6 U

3 r/ _/ z" Z1 V/ D2 P F 呢個人仲掂，, N+ D% i9 n3 c1 N9 g2 F4 `. S
知道既唔等於要講，
/ s& ?; ^- m7 N6 V+ T如果呢件事發生係自己身上，4 [1 t: G8 |8 T1 r& {5 T- x" O
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
/ m; C: `% P* B4 @- Q4 ]
; S* c& ^: h0 \, d* l0 C3 s最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 K7 M/ G% y* h4 B9 g
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。+ v3 d9 s" w  ]2 Y7 T) g, W
# t, M0 p2 l2 C" o- W

! S. i# P1 E' W$ `0 l) ?6 t
& j* v. j& u) k# P6 j5 T$ Q題外話：
' Q4 Z; t; U  a& v. X唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，; e" `& Q' \3 r2 l
睇到 S 呢條友，5 z7 v$ B- F* o2 K& c: @& L: ^
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
6 s) s& p1 l# I+ h- \, _
; y0 ^: s1 b( X1 D" n- N7 @" t& `S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
8 J# j- |2 ?$ X; I( QF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係& w5 [9 z  u1 l$ o; ?
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她7 d/ ]( ?' J. d* s/ I; b: u
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害3 _, f; w& @% |5 l
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...