奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:0 z1 L' |, v' t3 `0 p  \1 E

8 O% y0 V7 t& E1 v$ N4 o) ^agree,
6 e4 z- `/ c3 b0 |0 K4 B+ A我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
# r; M; G! u3 }但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,/ R2 \7 I! _; D( T
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 f7 s. k  {* w: l7 s
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html- b( z/ c# @* F1 t: v) @& E
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
) D% h% R! n4 Y$ v/ p$ S搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.5 e  X, y! B7 {! g7 B4 D3 h& [& b& C
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
( }5 P8 h0 v6 D4 k5 r+ G& M  L" D有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
8 C" g- e# f) e3 e
. w9 c1 L! J# ~! q! W3 B7 Q' q係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
1 V# ~6 N$ l& F" f7 V6 u
6 x& o6 {$ ?: R4 T" e為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

: ^/ e9 n1 T5 [, ?8 U

& m  d1 {# \; K4 u# t9 B絕對支持啦
, s; F7 ^$ e7 @) c
8 ~. Z% I9 d% K+ X* }5 R6 W7 ~有錯就認,打就企定
* I/ X* ?  W! [7 Z% k6 V5 d% F
- |0 f* g7 P6 _無錯當然要撐到底; V# x$ \! Y1 v5 z' z% y

& S  M3 E, Q; J& ^5 Y7 W但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
# d3 M7 h5 a- {
8 y% D9 `" H% p8 [在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得' r' j" Z  [; W2 d2 M
1 G' x& [: y. t7 j- H/ ~
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
  _# P: |( X1 j) @  T- A& e! O, h8 g3 o$ ?  [2 k
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
# F. G; w+ B4 f  l: D7 K9 e! f# C. L- k* S9 {  `7 b
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
! h: Y( B# ~! }2 w) @+ {
( T6 I9 U& }* T) [我唔認為lor
* R5 @" P1 [$ ]( z. J/ a* f
! N$ L4 A3 Z' \/ X% n. x唔係話要整死佢地
7 I8 u% ]5 G5 D2 I0 X( F0 R  \+ e/ j  B
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用0 f3 O. u2 F( s7 _4 {- `& X
  ~' u9 Y1 _7 h: a
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大0 |1 ]9 K. l* @$ M1 |; O* t

* v8 ]  _+ E5 |; p8 I( A有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的+ M  ^3 b) G1 M4 W

; D: Q( A2 k' a* p, x: n唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由+ U' p4 z9 \) R! I1 W

8 C9 c6 t. [4 d) e; E0 e9 f大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句, M7 ~; _" u# }0 E) O
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
  }+ v4 o8 B' `9 }
. L8 A2 l8 U% S( v我們的大學生7 o! O, [. I6 |6 B% v" h9 p8 Y: z
; ?3 L! G; \: i# M
9 Z' s+ J- t7 Z# I; P' Q" Q
0 m7 L1 i' j& H4 z+ M, K

0 j; Q+ r) k$ j4 y, W: O: ]

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:$ k% f8 v4 b8 w& R- I! {

$ a" R8 L+ J( U) \1 @' R0 c) \6 N# z9 e  v
有見地 !!!
3 K% N+ M7 U$ M2 l5 P+ `現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
. q2 {0 B# |% j6 s- }0 p# m5 e" i1 j: H, Z
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 8 {; e; m* |) @5 y- c; O: m( ?
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 0 I( U4 {* M, {" E4 a
I pretty sad that about the University official., J/ B4 J& |6 R! a
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
; g+ U, A  f6 p' i" N3 n' J* j' E& ^5 w8 V; o' s# E* W
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:5 N! ^- s9 E5 F9 d- k
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la! z# s% ?- F  ~1 p# b5 X' n! T
( x" G: \- ^( [- u8 f* ?, q, P
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

) n" t1 o* A9 G% p9 _) `6 J
; @3 C1 k2 y0 _. N7 m3 }! z
兩者有何分別?7 D1 u& t8 Y# A# U; q
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?