奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:& |* O1 \0 D, M1 P0 ]
- _$ e! o" i- b2 ?1 }
agree,1 q6 @& f& F: F" X3 @4 N/ v
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
( a% {8 M. @. @& p) U' f但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,; {6 b  f9 W9 L% O* _3 G* V
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

3 U# f( ~; [0 `  }, F. ehttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% P7 G9 v/ M' {6 F已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
  t  A7 ~0 {8 U, e$ ~搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
* V: v8 N$ f5 A4 D( f. t( \Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:5 V5 x8 R5 @. V* U" q; \
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 6 Y  g/ L- R0 T" z; t, ^
1 a0 R  X4 h* @/ ]; G
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???( [$ i" f0 [- |3 C
* ~6 z$ _. r4 {( v) m# {
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

0 X; K+ m: p1 r
  L6 p" H; m" e& c0 b3 p/ M絕對支持啦
* f" g2 `; C; q3 D( F( ]5 ^2 z' R0 L( g& g# D; Y/ }
有錯就認,打就企定4 |/ w) a# h4 u+ w; Y; S, |

( a; o( w; w$ p2 N- [無錯當然要撐到底
) j2 o/ Q! b: W  o$ @1 i; m4 B8 Y9 s3 }- x' E! n' ?
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
' m; F+ G7 ^" P& P' a( ~* f1 E+ m, r4 I: j- ?0 c
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得! e9 [: P2 g( t
8 a1 M$ N# [; Q
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力. h. Z5 w. [1 [' D
* P6 N0 l9 }! |6 q- @7 f  z
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生3 I2 y  ?# Z9 t4 j, _
% f6 A/ U' C. p
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?1 U! Z5 B! z4 _1 K
5 t4 S" _) _  |$ _/ I) w
我唔認為lor
8 S) v, K* q) ^/ O
8 {/ u  Y' B) v# |8 L唔係話要整死佢地
8 |* B5 B' r% j& d7 v; ~' P: C" |5 t# R. I3 x! K4 _5 M
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
3 Z, K0 C% A" b7 b: E5 y# Y2 V$ J- j. t$ P, n7 @
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
) A- |/ J1 H, ^2 T: M; @8 V- h$ K' b7 a* v# F$ E& G) @
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
/ w$ E2 {/ V2 F' z( o0 U. L# a  h6 i  Y- D0 c1 O7 F' o3 o
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由' U3 W8 i2 j, \) j) A1 L
5 y( ]* \* A( G) K
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句% t* c$ G5 z' [
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"( v, Q9 b' Q  V' V2 d: L  ]# _
9 P, Y6 ]- L* x; X% [
我們的大學生* ~% F3 r" B2 t. X7 }# G2 f; e' y
  x1 b; E1 m2 Z- k0 h/ z' b+ x

: Z6 f: m7 @5 T- R6 y! y& ~) g- o' A1 v0 N

8 D  t5 p! b8 O% o6 I% e, `

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
& a9 G) H7 N7 j' z0 i
" D- ?9 [$ d1 N9 c; T: \  m' E" c8 r. _  I
有見地 !!!
, ~5 i; L. n1 Z: `1 D  t& r現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html6 l5 @8 y  N5 A% S! N
+ O9 A! W0 d  t+ L' n/ M
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
1 X4 f; _: G: c! o: ZI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. % O1 M; K: H) x/ j% u; u; ~
I pretty sad that about the University official.
3 Y" V( m) R8 m1 |" Y; X6 v& m) O$ TIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la; z- x/ \  K1 H$ o' b# L

  B( I- a/ ~8 a  y3 `[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
$ N0 B# }+ j: K" O0 D: t我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
7 h+ N) o+ R; b* N! a7 R
& _' g8 e/ M" H[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

$ H" J  ]$ e/ P6 N5 i& E- k8 X1 l: c, `, B; p
兩者有何分別?
  i8 X% W3 P4 O4 R) G9 S中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?